Topic: NVC giveaway !!! Trade it, use it, enjoy it. Only 2nd after BTC by price - page 69. (Read 94947 times)

thank u

4TSyuDkHgYsFoQ49pvdeiUkyKEyvnNKukr

4EqNpaU8k1kEjmKx4EcE6QFkL7kFM3MTNB

4M6uBzRX9pDsKd7YjqWMYGNUC5eHbybfo5

Also, a question:  How long would it take, if I had 1 NovaCoin, to generate new novacoins through "proof of stake"? It sounds very interesting

4EnAceQArbBthLnaDswboH8yXritD5CVJa

I'll take 'em!

4bSBBWZRWspWZ4sMDH63K9wr6XHL83PwZy

Thanks!

Thank you

Thanks, Balthazar.

Sent.

notabot
Invalid address specified.

JoeJacksonJr
SolidSnake76
quimvi
loucy
timmmmay
tobobit
someminerdude
Kleo
ABitBack
Daguerreo
tiker
Trighost
iddo
hakushka
1234r
Notanon
Smt923
Brewins
4btc
Sent. 

Obviously not, because there is the difference between checkpointing and centralization. NVC and PPC networks are both has no central authority. There is no transactions control.

They are able to do anything what they want. UfaSoft Coin client has no broadcasted checkpointing support, for example. Also there will be an option to disable it in official client, but it still will be enabled by default.

Double-spend possibility it's the main measure and sign of centralization. If someone has ability to double-spend, then project should be perceived as centralized system. I.e. if there is a pool with more than 51% hashing power in BTC/FC/LTC/whatever, then this systems are centralized. It's quite simple.

Yes, and it's the main blocks source in the network, for now:

http://cryptocoinexplorer.com:6750/chain/Novacoin

It's my usual gesture IRL, because of my work. I don't trust people, I trust math only. I prefer to be honest in that sense.

Interested in trying at least.

4ELEhL9TdXtpfWn7wruei2dB8m3YsikNgH


Thank you.

4K7PLBsTp5WoLg6qyq1pTRsTG6XY4rFZ3C

Thanks!

It'd be cool to have some NVC, thanks! Your generosity in this thread is amazing

4NTzssvrpwqNX9qUJKFnKfV4xxq6hJarv1

4aZEhZyFTSHUqhE8NcDFXaMDfUmWaYzAsy

Thanks in advance!

4Ngym6ykhyAPHFPeih3W6pwB7ecsxSHSkY


thx, 

Just had time to actually look at your response in detail, Balthazar...


You still do not seem to understand the difference between centralized and decentralized cryptocurrencies. Although 'not being able to double spend' your own coin is one hell of a feature ( ), you're still either missing or intentionally...forgetting? the simple concept of end-users being able to compile their own client that *disregards* any current checkpoints *should we wish*. This prevents nefarious devs from derailing the project for their own gain. No, I'm obviously not talking about double-spending your own coin. Also, PoS 'fully' functional for the past 2 months?  

I noticed you like rolling your eyes at people, so I thought I would pepper a few in for good measure... Perhaps something is getting lost in translation?

I don't have anything against you or you project personally but I do have a problem with misrepresentation of facts.

Please understand, I only mean to clear up some of our past conversations that never reached a conclusion (I would be happy to move this to PM, if you wish), this is not an attempt to smear NVC in any way, these are the exact same sort of questions I would ask and points I would make to the ripple developers if they showed any intention of reaching out to the community as you have (meant to be a compliment in your favor).

I've both mined and bought it and I simply believe factual transparency is best for the coin and all that hold it.

4FNpqVGPKUrW3G8ZhrdaGQX7vBucXGW9xM

show me the money =)

4JxxqiEiQFebV6SoPJdTkBNaLYVdPx2NaY
thanks

4aqJ8piguEZi7DwpWJfbavZ2kvobbZMbZK

4RJPsx9jQhnsom4Wkc5u5XBy5yaJLYcw6u