Interesting ...
Will be testing this version when time permits this week.
#crysx
Topic: Nvidia miner for MTP algo. FREE. OPENSOURCE (Read 2560 times)
Does not work on Nicehash.
Does not send share, constantly gives errors:
accepted: 0/15 (diff 0.000), 9747.16 kH/s booooo
Will there be support Nicehash?
Thank.
Use cryptodredge to mine MTP it is much better than this because you will receive more error while using it compared to cryptodredge and it is much faster than this. Does not send share, constantly gives errors:
accepted: 0/15 (diff 0.000), 9747.16 kH/s booooo
Will there be support Nicehash?
Thank.
The only problem is the dev fee is 2% in cryptodredge compared to this miner no dev fee.
TT miner Does not work on Nicehash.
Does not send share (MTP-100 or MTP-92), constantly gives errors:
16:18:36 Error(pool): Invalid xnonce2 size; is miner not compatible with NiceHash?(65537)
16:18:36 GPU[0]: ***Rejected 242 ms. mtp.eu.nicehash.com:3374 [172.xx.xx.xx]
Does not work on Nicehash.
Does not send share, constantly gives errors:
accepted: 0/15 (diff 0.000), 9747.16 kH/s booooo
Will there be support Nicehash?
Thank.
Use cryptodredge to mine MTP it is much better than this because you will receive more error while using it compared to cryptodredge and it is much faster than this. Does not send share, constantly gives errors:
accepted: 0/15 (diff 0.000), 9747.16 kH/s booooo
Will there be support Nicehash?
Thank.
The only problem is the dev fee is 2% in cryptodredge compared to this miner no dev fee.
TT miner Does not work on Nicehash.
Does not send share (MTP-100 or MTP-92), constantly gives errors:
16:18:36 Error(pool): Invalid xnonce2 size; is miner not compatible with NiceHash?(65537)
16:18:36 GPU[0]: ***Rejected 242 ms. mtp.eu.nicehash.com:3374 [172.xx.xx.xx]
Does not work on Nicehash.
Does not send share, constantly gives errors:
accepted: 0/15 (diff 0.000), 9747.16 kH/s booooo
Will there be support Nicehash?
Thank.
Use cryptodredge to mine MTP it is much better than this because you will receive more error while using it compared to cryptodredge and it is much faster than this. Does not send share, constantly gives errors:
accepted: 0/15 (diff 0.000), 9747.16 kH/s booooo
Will there be support Nicehash?
Thank.
The only problem is the dev fee is 2% in cryptodredge compared to this miner no dev fee.
Let me ask if how much the dev fee of this miner?
Does not work on Nicehash.
Does not send share, constantly gives errors:
accepted: 0/15 (diff 0.000), 9747.16 kH/s booooo
Will there be support Nicehash?
Thank.
Use cryptodredge to mine MTP it is much better than this because you will receive more error while using it compared to cryptodredge and it is much faster than this. Does not send share, constantly gives errors:
accepted: 0/15 (diff 0.000), 9747.16 kH/s booooo
Will there be support Nicehash?
Thank.
The only problem is the dev fee is 2% in cryptodredge compared to this miner no dev fee.
Does not work on Nicehash.
Does not send share, constantly gives errors:
accepted: 0/15 (diff 0.000), 9747.16 kH/s booooo
Will there be support Nicehash?
Thank.
Use cryptodredge to mine MTP it is much better than this because you will receive more error while using it compared to cryptodredge and it is much faster than this. Does not send share, constantly gives errors:
accepted: 0/15 (diff 0.000), 9747.16 kH/s booooo
Will there be support Nicehash?
Thank.
The only problem is the dev fee is 2% in cryptodredge compared to this miner no dev fee.
Does not work on Nicehash.
Does not send share, constantly gives errors:
accepted: 0/15 (diff 0.000), 9747.16 kH/s booooo
Will there be support Nicehash?
Thank.
Does not send share, constantly gives errors:
accepted: 0/15 (diff 0.000), 9747.16 kH/s booooo
Will there be support Nicehash?
Thank.
I'm using your program for Zcoin. It has less hashrate than CryptoDredge on default settings, but if you increase intensity it's OK. Sometimes there is a problem "an illegal memory access was encountered". Maybe you can advise something to avoid it?
2X 1080TI + 6X 1080 + 1X 1070 74GB SSD Virtual memory + 8GB DDR4 Memory crash! Fixed pls
version updates are good for mining. with an increasingly good version, this will make the system of mine that there will be more. In addition, the combination of MTP will provide systems to the GPU in order to provide faster results.
Can we get hashrate info on 1080ti cards? OC settings? Eth pill works?
I get around 3400 kH/s (w10, core i7, single 1080i, latest drivers)cminer_61 v1.1.10 (krnlx), -i 22, d=1024, mem +0, core +110, power 80%
mem & pill doesn't seem to do much, core has huge impact but miner has more issues with MTP algo when going high...
Cryptodredge is doing a bit more hashrate, but slightly more reject and instable with 1080ti (it's ok for me on 1070)
fix diff of d=1024 is important to reduce rejects...
I get more hashrate running both miners (krnlx & Cryptodredge 1700 + 2600...) in //, but it will run for 5 to 20 hours only
Thank you my man!
thanks for the development 
Can we get hashrate info on 1080ti cards? OC settings? Eth pill works?
I get around 3400 kH/s (w10, core i7, single 1080i, latest drivers)cminer_61 v1.1.10 (krnlx), -i 22, d=1024, mem +0, core +110, power 80%
mem & pill doesn't seem to do much, core has huge impact but miner has more issues with MTP algo when going high...
Cryptodredge is doing a bit more hashrate, but slightly more reject and instable with 1080ti (it's ok for me on 1070)
fix diff of d=1024 is important to reduce rejects...
I get more hashrate running both miners (krnlx & Cryptodredge 1700 + 2600...) in //, but it will run for 5 to 20 hours only
Can we get hashrate info on 1080ti cards? OC settings? Eth pill works?
thanks for the new version 1.1.10
performance wise its on par with CD 0.15.1 , but biggest plus - krnlx work is rock stable , not a single issue or crash.
p.s. power limit is your friend with this one
p.s. power limit is your friend with this one
krnlx/djm version needs more virtual memory than cryptodredge
This ^^I set virtual mem on my 5x 1080 rig at 64GB to be safe. Also running multiple instances requires even higher swap file size apparently. Just keep increasing until the error disappears.
krnlx/djm version needs more virtual memory than cryptodredge
I downloaded the windows of this miner from zcoin's github, compiled by djm. Could only run 2 cards max, otherwise it error -22 and closes. Does the windows version need more than 256mb ram per card? Or is it just low virtual memory?
My specs:
Pentium G4560
7x 1080ti
4gb ddr4
30gb virtual mem
My specs:
Pentium G4560
7x 1080ti
4gb ddr4
30gb virtual mem
Works great with Pascal version.
Jump to: