Author

Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 1322. (Read 2761642 times)

hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1002
Simcoin Developer
If we could create a thorough and precise protocol description in something like an RFC then I think that I might be interested to volunteer my own time towards creating a C++ version of Nxt.

Oh boy, if you ever do, count on my help! Smiley

But we can't even write a single whitepaper and there are also those mysterious "traps" and "parts" of BCNext plan yet to be announced...
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
@Nexern: I think that's a great way to handle passwords Smiley Agree with NxtChg about the separator, just fix it as a character never used in the suffix (having one less char to use is no big deal), this should be clear enough. This reduces the burden of having to remember what the separator was, in case folks have to reformat and reinstall the client (consequently wiping all settings) or something. Alternatively, just include the separator in the suffix and save it to file.

EDIT: Use the password as one seed for the suffix, and save the separator and other seed to file. This should gives free encryption for the suffix file (assuming secure choice of generating algo).
full member
Activity: 184
Merit: 100
Can someone answer me this:

If i forge a block, can someone else see my IP then?
Or lets phrase it diffrently. I need to run a node to forge, is my account number connected to the forging IP?

Could someone please answer this?

I was discussing this with a friend and we came to the conclusion that this would be a huge security concern if it is indeed so.


why? because I could potentially identify your address via IP and rob you?
legendary
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
Guys - here is an idea that I think could really separate Nxt from all other cryptos and ensure its widespread adoption.

Why not "fully document the Nxt protocol as a *document* rather than just as Java source code"?

Bitcoin has constantly fought against this idea and has constantly made sure that no-one can write a Bitcoin node without using the Bitcoin software (and they have been quite vocal in attacking projects that have attempted to do this - you just need to look into the attempts to do Bitcoin in C to see this).

Although I don't mind that some of the features being currently "kept under wraps" to stop premature forks I think if we can get out of the whole "this source code is the protocol" mindset then we would really have something very different.

If we could create a thorough and precise protocol description in something like an RFC then I think that I might be interested to volunteer my own time towards creating a C++ version of Nxt.
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1010
Hi everyone.

How about these for a couple of proofs of concept?  Two one-minute spots I recorded this evening:

General Nxt intro: https://soundcloud.com/whatsupnxt/nxtminute-0001
Nxt minute: https://soundcloud.com/whatsupnxt/nxtminute_0002

I welcome feedback.

You have an amazingly good radio voice.
It's a pleasure to listen to Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1016
Something wrong with network. Base target going >1000%

51506      4747512364439223888       318 %
Are you on fork?
same
full member
Activity: 193
Merit: 100
Something wrong with network. Base target going >1000%

51506      4747512364439223888       318 %
Are you on fork?
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
Will it actually be possible to create different Accountnumbers for the same account?

What I mean is something like: I have a main account A. I don't want others to know how much NXT are on my main acc so I use different acc-numbers (B,C,D..) which are like an alias for A, ultimately sending the money to A without showing others the balance of A.


it is unnecessary. when mixing is implemented you create a second account and move your NXT savings to this one.

legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1001
CEO Bitpanda.com
Something wrong with network. Base target going >1000%

nothing wrong with that. Cfb said 600-700% it is on average.
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
I don't really come from outer space.
Something wrong with network. Base target going >1000%

Block check:
Code:
51504    12878449690173416069	  1/27/2014 8:59:13 AM	
0        0 + 0                    0 B
2        8655454013675091704      272 %
legendary
Activity: 1367
Merit: 1000
Something wrong with network. Base target going >1000%
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
I don't really come from outer space.
Can someone give me the block with the height of 40000. Smiley Thanks.

http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=1000&blk=16444520949133310232
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1001
CEO Bitpanda.com
It took BTC 1 Year to reach 35000 transactions and 2 Years to reach 235000 transactions.

After 2 months we already had 100.000 Transactions, thats not too bad Wink
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
Hi everyone.

How about these for a couple of proofs of concept?  Two one-minute spots I recorded this evening:

General Nxt intro: https://soundcloud.com/whatsupnxt/nxtminute-0001
Nxt minute: https://soundcloud.com/whatsupnxt/nxtminute_0002

I welcome feedback.

Fantastic!!!
full member
Activity: 360
Merit: 100
Will it actually be possible to create different Accountnumbers for the same account?

What I mean is something like: I have a main account A. I don't want others to know how much NXT are on my main acc so I use different acc-numbers (B,C,D..) which are like an alias for A, ultimately sending the money to A without showing others the balance of A.

Is that possible? Of course I can create 10 new accounts, but that's not really convenient for this purpose...
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
Very good coin I have made a good profit with this now it only a matter of a few weeks.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Anyone else get VERY SLOW responses from the API? I use it on http://nxtra.org faucet - which now loads very slowly since updating to 0.5.10 - any ideas?

Edit: never mind, redownloading the entire blockchain seems to fix this issue.

Edit 2: actually, as soon as it comes to block 51xxx it starts to massively slow down again... Anyone experiencing the same?

Same here. It's unusable after block 51.000. I have to stop developement on my client until this is fixed.
I am aware of the problem, I will have a fix later tonight or tomorrow.

Thanks for the feedback! Take your time. Just good to know we got your attention.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Anyone else get VERY SLOW responses from the API? I use it on http://nxtra.org faucet - which now loads very slowly since updating to 0.5.10 - any ideas?

Edit: never mind, redownloading the entire blockchain seems to fix this issue.

Edit 2: actually, as soon as it comes to block 51xxx it starts to massively slow down again... Anyone experiencing the same?

Same here. It's unusable after block 51.000. I have to stop developement on my client until this is fixed.
I am aware of the problem, I will have a fix later tonight or tomorrow.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1001
CEO Bitpanda.com
Anyone else get VERY SLOW responses from the API? I use it on http://nxtra.org faucet - which now loads very slowly since updating to 0.5.10 - any ideas?

Edit: never mind, redownloading the entire blockchain seems to fix this issue.

Edit 2: actually, as soon as it comes to block 51xxx it starts to massively slow down again... Anyone experiencing the same?

Same here. It's unusable after block 51.000. I have to stop developement on my client until this is fixed.

I see 20SECONDS when I query nxtra.org!!!

getting a balance is no problem:
balance - 0
effectiveBalance - 0
unconfirmedBalance - 0

1390815008.483589 sysTime
0.2919137477874756 deltaIO time       <-------- 291..ms

balance - 0
effectiveBalance - 0
unconfirmedBalance - 0

1390815040.7796984
0.30041980743408203      <------------------ 300ms

getSTate:

numberOfPeers - 330
lastBlockchainFeeder - vps5.nxtcrypto.org
numberOfTransactions - 105589
maxMemory - 508887040
numberOfAliases - 54687
totalMemory - 264740864
version - 0.5.10
availableProcessors - 1
numberOfOrders - 0
totalEffectiveBalance - 97939470100
numberOfUsers - 0
numberOfAssets - 0
lastBlock - 6310960314174409070
freeMemory - 37860416
cumulativeDifficulty - 1562535900112614
numberOfBlocks - 51351
numberOfAccounts - 19060
time - 5520681

1390815099.7260482
19.54354977607727   <--------------- ouch!




just wanted to confirm that my 5.10 machine takes 4.5 seconds for the getstate query
legendary
Activity: 1181
Merit: 1018
Anyone else get VERY SLOW responses from the API? I use it on http://nxtra.org faucet - which now loads very slowly since updating to 0.5.10 - any ideas?

Edit: never mind, redownloading the entire blockchain seems to fix this issue.

Edit 2: actually, as soon as it comes to block 51xxx it starts to massively slow down again... Anyone experiencing the same?

Same here. It's unusable after block 51.000. I have to stop developement on my client until this is fixed.

I see 20SECONDS when I query nxtra.org!!!

getting a balance is no problem:
balance - 0
effectiveBalance - 0
unconfirmedBalance - 0

1390815008.483589 sysTime
0.2919137477874756 deltaIO time       <-------- 291..ms

balance - 0
effectiveBalance - 0
unconfirmedBalance - 0

1390815040.7796984
0.30041980743408203      <------------------ 300ms

getSTate:

numberOfPeers - 330
lastBlockchainFeeder - vps5.nxtcrypto.org
numberOfTransactions - 105589
maxMemory - 508887040
numberOfAliases - 54687
totalMemory - 264740864
version - 0.5.10
availableProcessors - 1
numberOfOrders - 0
totalEffectiveBalance - 97939470100
numberOfUsers - 0
numberOfAssets - 0
lastBlock - 6310960314174409070
freeMemory - 37860416
cumulativeDifficulty - 1562535900112614
numberOfBlocks - 51351
numberOfAccounts - 19060
time - 5520681

1390815099.7260482
19.54354977607727   <--------------- ouch!


Jump to: