NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 2318.

Come-from-Beyond

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1010

Newbie

Quote from: opticalcarrier on December 22, 2013, 01:54:57 AM

Also host#2 sees host#1 with a blue cloud, how on earth did that happen?

But your answer to #2.... does the "you can generate the next block in..." message end up having the same exact time on each host? (I dont have access to 1 of them right now) or is it possible that by doing this that I double my forging power? cause that would be FREAKING AWESOME

ETA: im at host#2 right now, and I see host#1's IP in the "active peers" window but its got a red flag on it. why is that?

Blue cloud means that node is in well-known peers list.

"You can generate the next block in..." message is exactly the same. U can't double ur forging power this way, sorry

Red flag means that last request to that node was unsuccessful (switch "logPeerCommunication" on to figure out why).

opticalcarrier

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: utopianfuture on December 22, 2013, 02:06:32 AM

What's optimal strategy to place the fee ? What's the equilibrium. 100 Nxt for anyone with an adequate solution.

It has to be big enough to encourage lots of accounts forging (staying active for the health of the network) It has to be small enough to promote usage. I say flat .1% across the board

pinarello

full member

Activity: 266

Merit: 100

NXT is the future

60 minuts till

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ycMhMM2UFs

Pin

utopianfuture

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 268

Internet of Value

What's optimal strategy to place the fee ? What's the equilibrium. 100 Nxt for anyone with an adequate solution.

landomata

legendary

Activity: 2184

Merit: 1000

Quote from: opticalcarrier on December 22, 2013, 02:01:18 AM

Quote from: eB101 on December 22, 2013, 01:59:01 AM

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on December 22, 2013, 01:47:23 AM

Quote from: Ola on December 22, 2013, 01:40:42 AM

IF cfb advises against it then fine...

CFB is just a programmer and one of lesser stakeholders. Ppl should stop thinking that I'm an official spokesperson.

You are also our only connection to BCnext at this point: the next ~~Satoshi~~'s second. On this note, I take this opportunity to thank you for all your support here. I've been following the thread and discussions from the beginning without necessarily being active, and can only admire your patience and generosity to help. Please don't disappear after dev

hell yeah dude I wanna party with CfB next year when our rocket hits the moon! Im bringing vodka

opticalcarrier

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: eB101 on December 22, 2013, 01:59:01 AM

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on December 22, 2013, 01:47:23 AM

Quote from: Ola on December 22, 2013, 01:40:42 AM

IF cfb advises against it then fine...

CFB is just a programmer and one of lesser stakeholders. Ppl should stop thinking that I'm an official spokesperson.

You are also our only connection to BCnext at this point: the next ~~Satoshi~~'s second. On this note, I take this opportunity to thank you for all your support here. I've been following the thread and discussions from the beginning without necessarily being active, and can only admire your patience and generosity to help. Please don't disappear after dev

hell yeah dude I wanna party with CfB next year when our rocket hits the moon! Im bringing vodka

eB101

full member

Activity: 132

Merit: 100

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on December 22, 2013, 01:47:23 AM

Quote from: Ola on December 22, 2013, 01:40:42 AM

IF cfb advises against it then fine...

CFB is just a programmer and one of lesser stakeholders. Ppl should stop thinking that I'm an official spokesperson.

You are also our only connection to BCnext at this point: the next ~~Satoshi~~'s second. On this note, I take this opportunity to thank you for all your support here. I've been following the thread and discussions from the beginning without necessarily being active, and can only admire your patience and generosity to help. Please don't disappear after dev

Ola

sr. member

Activity: 311

Merit: 250

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on December 22, 2013, 01:47:23 AM

Quote from: Ola on December 22, 2013, 01:40:42 AM

IF cfb advises against it then fine...

CFB is just a programmer and one of lesser stakeholders. Ppl should stop thinking that I'm an official spokesperson.

I understand your role quite well, but you are somewhat the unofficial moderator of this thread since bcnext went incognito, so you should at least say something if you feel the little facetious references throws the purpose of the thread off track...no one's indicated this is a problem thus far so I assume its ok from time to time.

opticalcarrier

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on December 22, 2013, 01:48:47 AM

Quote from: opticalcarrier on December 22, 2013, 01:41:00 AM

hypothetical situation regarding a SINGLE account running on 2 different hallmarked nodes, each having different IPs.

First node is hallmarked with a with a date and weight of which I have forgotten both values.
Second node is hallmarked with 2013-12-22 and a weight which I believe is well over the 1st nodes weight.

I started forging on the 1st node, then later started forging on the second node. Both nodes are allowing TCP7874 inbound from the network to the host.

Question1: Does the entire network just completely ignore the 1st node since it has the older date?

Question2: Is the 2nd node forging with the entire balance of the account's coins?

1. No.
2. Each node will be forging with the entire balance. Hallmark has no connection to Forging.

ah.. that old date just invalidates the hallmark on that node, not the node or the forging account on it... got it. Also host#2 sees host#1 with a blue cloud, how on earth did that happen?

But your answer to #2.... does the "you can generate the next block in..." message end up having the same exact time on each host? (I dont have access to 1 of them right now) or is it possible that by doing this that I double my forging power? cause that would be FREAKING AWESOME

ETA: im at host#2 right now, and I see host#1's IP in the "active peers" window but its got a red flag on it. why is that?

OKNXT

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

You know Nxt is serious, and you know dogecoin is not serious. So please stop your doge website!

Come-from-Beyond

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1010

Newbie

Quote from: opticalcarrier on December 22, 2013, 01:41:00 AM

hypothetical situation regarding a SINGLE account running on 2 different hallmarked nodes, each having different IPs.

First node is hallmarked with a with a date and weight of which I have forgotten both values.
Second node is hallmarked with 2013-12-22 and a weight which I believe is well over the 1st nodes weight.

I started forging on the 1st node, then later started forging on the second node. Both nodes are allowing TCP7874 inbound from the network to the host.

Question1: Does the entire network just completely ignore the 1st node since it has the older date?

Question2: Is the 2nd node forging with the entire balance of the account's coins?

1. No.
2. Each node will be forging with the entire balance. Hallmark has no connection to Forging.

Come-from-Beyond

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1010

Newbie

Quote from: Ola on December 22, 2013, 01:40:42 AM

IF cfb advises against it then fine...

CFB is just a programmer and one of lesser stakeholders. Ppl should stop thinking that I'm an official spokesperson.

utopianfuture

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 268

Internet of Value

Quote from: Drexme on December 22, 2013, 01:37:21 AM

Quote from: Ola on December 22, 2013, 01:34:25 AM

nxt currency, very currency so adoption wow

Please don't do that here Embarrassed

This crypto is serious

Hey Drexme, just saying I am going to get the Doge. Get ready to war Grin

opticalcarrier

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

hypothetical situation regarding a SINGLE account running on 2 different hallmarked nodes, each having different IPs.

First node is hallmarked with a with a date and weight of which I have forgotten both values.
Second node is hallmarked with 2013-12-22 and a weight which I believe is well over the 1st nodes weight.

I started forging on the 1st node, then later started forging on the second node. Both nodes are allowing TCP7874 inbound from the network to the host.

Question1: Does the entire network just completely ignore the 1st node since it has the older date?

Question2: Is the 2nd node forging with the entire balance of the account's coins?

Ola

sr. member

Activity: 311

Merit: 250

Quote from: Drexme on December 22, 2013, 01:37:21 AM

Quote from: Ola on December 22, 2013, 01:34:25 AM

nxt currency, very currency so adoption wow

Please don't do that here Embarrassed

This crypto is serious

thanks for stating the obvious!! Roll Eyes

We know its serious...if you don't know...we sarcastically joke around from time to time using "dogecoin" lines here...it also lessens the very thick tension of the bidding war thats about to start that you may not be aware of for your information!!!

IF cfb advises against it then fine...

Drexme

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: Ola on December 22, 2013, 01:34:25 AM

nxt currency, very currency so adoption wow

Please don't do that here Embarrassed

This crypto is serious

Come-from-Beyond

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1010

Newbie

Quote from: Drexme on December 22, 2013, 01:32:53 AM

I'm talking about doges.org Huh

I want to link NXT forum there.

Ah

Ola

sr. member

Activity: 311

Merit: 250

nxt currency, very currency so adoption wow

Drexme

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

I'm talking about doges.org Huh

I want to link NXT forum there.

Come-from-Beyond

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1010

Newbie

Quote from: Drexme on December 22, 2013, 01:23:44 AM

Already did.

See none. R we talking about https://nextcoin.org/ ?

Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 2318. (Read 2761629 times)