NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 571.

2Kool4Skewl

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 250

Quote from: wesleyh on March 03, 2014, 03:37:04 AM

Quote from: bitcoinpaul on March 03, 2014, 03:35:17 AM

Quote from: 2Kool4Skewl on March 03, 2014, 03:22:20 AM

It's an interesting idea.

I think we should all remember BCNext's vision for NXT and his thoughts regarding fees. I agree with BCNext wanting NXT fees to be low. Imo, 1000 NXT for asset name registration is too high. I think you should be able to register an asset name for 1 NXT. By setting NXT fees high, we are excluding people from NXT because they cannot afford the registration price. NXT should be for everyone.

We should first talk about WHAT we want to accomplish and WHY. I don't want to hear "uh, it's interesting", "yeah, nice idea" or "BCNext said fee must be low".

I want your motivation behind this first. After we discussed that, we could talk about possible realization.

If you cannot pay 1000 NXT for an asset, then what is your asset going to do anyway?

Assets don't have to be physically backed. They can be a form of social credit. Communities that use social credit systems usually do so because they lack capital.

longzai1988

member

Activity: 77

Merit: 10

Quote from: 2Kool4Skewl on March 03, 2014, 03:37:12 AM

By setting NXT fees high, we are excluding people from NXT because they cannot afford the registration price. NXT should be for everyone.

This was BCNext's reason for wanting low fees and I agree with him.

I am hearing bitcoin is going to reduce its transaction fees to 10 folds, that is not even 1cents, if that happen, 1Nxt as transactions fees is definitely too high

Come-from-Beyond

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1010

Newbie

Quote from: 2Kool4Skewl on March 03, 2014, 03:37:12 AM

By setting NXT fees high, we are excluding people from NXT because they cannot afford the registration price. NXT should be for everyone.

This was BCNext's reason for wanting low fees and I agree with him.

1000 NXT is just a countermeasure to prevent squatting of best names in the very 1st day after AE is launched. Later we can set the fee to 1 NXT.

Emule

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: ChuckOne on March 03, 2014, 03:29:12 AM

Quote from: Emule on March 02, 2014, 06:31:22 PM

Quote from: newsilike on March 02, 2014, 06:13:18 PM

Quote from: Mises_77 on March 02, 2014, 05:48:28 PM

In the latest LetsTalkBitcoin podcast (88), NXT gets a small mention..

http://letstalkbitcoin.com/e88-gox-gox-gox-gox-gox-gox-gox/#.UxOzX-NdXkk
(Ethereum Evangelist Joel Dietz, about 36 mins in)

They aren't going to know what hit 'em Grin

These people seem to be not really aware of Nxt... I guess Cheesy

I would be scared as an Ethereum guy^^

nobody is aware of nxt thanks to epic failing marketing

they burn nxt with zero result and wrong approach but nobody dare to tell

marketing priority must be get fresh money in to nxt but money is flowing out of nxt due constant selling.

What do you suggest then?

whales need to stop selling below 1$

simple: draw the money into nxt! nxt need BUY VOLUME!

you dont get that by shaking hands on conferences exchaging printed businesscards.

marketing must shift and focus on investors, not in the public that already know nxt as they do now.

GO GET THE MONEY

2Kool4Skewl

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 250

Quote from: bitcoinpaul on March 03, 2014, 03:35:17 AM

Quote from: 2Kool4Skewl on March 03, 2014, 03:22:20 AM

It's an interesting idea.

I think we should all remember BCNext's vision for NXT and his thoughts regarding fees. I agree with BCNext wanting NXT fees to be low. Imo, 1000 NXT for asset name registration is too high. I think you should be able to register an asset name for 1 NXT. By setting NXT fees high, we are excluding people from NXT because they cannot afford the registration price. NXT should be for everyone.

We should first talk about WHAT we want to accomplish and WHY. I don't want to hear "uh, it's interesting", "yeah, nice idea" or "BCNext said fee must be low".

I want your motivation behind this first. After we discussed that, we could talk about possible realization.

By setting NXT fees high, we are excluding people from NXT because they cannot afford the registration price. NXT should be for everyone.

This was BCNext's reason for wanting low fees and I agree with him.

wesleyh

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: bitcoinpaul on March 03, 2014, 03:35:17 AM

Quote from: 2Kool4Skewl on March 03, 2014, 03:22:20 AM

It's an interesting idea.

I think we should all remember BCNext's vision for NXT and his thoughts regarding fees. I agree with BCNext wanting NXT fees to be low. Imo, 1000 NXT for asset name registration is too high. I think you should be able to register an asset name for 1 NXT. By setting NXT fees high, we are excluding people from NXT because they cannot afford the registration price. NXT should be for everyone.

We should first talk about WHAT we want to accomplish and WHY. I don't want to hear "uh, it's interesting", "yeah, nice idea" or "BCNext said fee must be low".

I want your motivation behind this first. After we discussed that, we could talk about possible realization.

If you cannot pay 1000 NXT for an asset, then what is your asset going to do anyway?

bitcoinpaul

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quote from: 2Kool4Skewl on March 03, 2014, 03:22:20 AM

It's an interesting idea.

I think we should all remember BCNext's vision for NXT and his thoughts regarding fees. I agree with BCNext wanting NXT fees to be low. Imo, 1000 NXT for asset name registration is too high. I think you should be able to register an asset name for 1 NXT. By setting NXT fees high, we are excluding people from NXT because they cannot afford the registration price. NXT should be for everyone.

We should first talk about WHAT we want to accomplish and WHY. I don't want to hear "uh, it's interesting", "yeah, nice idea" or "BCNext said fee must be low".

I want your real motivation behind this first. After we discussed that, we could talk about possible realization.

edit: Exluding people from NXT is a very lax assumption.

longzai1988

member

Activity: 77

Merit: 10

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on March 03, 2014, 03:29:53 AM

No, we shouldn't. It's quite funny to watch him working so hard trying to initiate panic sell. He is also a very good example of what ppl become when they sell NXTs as cheap as he did.

Agree to this, your day will become cheerier when emule is around

Eadeqa

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on March 03, 2014, 03:29:53 AM

Quote from: Eadeqa on March 03, 2014, 03:25:57 AM

Hey, just use the ignore button

It works really nicely.

Try it

Everyone should put Emule on ignore

No, we shouldn't. It's quite funny to watch him working so hard trying to initiate panic sell. He is also a very good example of what ppl become when they sell NXTs as cheap as he did.

Putting him on ignore is just best slap on his face, actually

I will stick with that

eightspaces

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on March 03, 2014, 03:29:53 AM

Quote from: Eadeqa on March 03, 2014, 03:25:57 AM

Hey, just use the ignore button

It works really nicely.

Try it

Everyone should put Emule on ignore

No, we shouldn't. It's quite funny to watch him working so hard trying to initiate panic sell. He is also a very good example of what ppl become when they sell NXTs as cheap as he did.

Come-from-Beyond

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1010

Newbie

Quote from: Eadeqa on March 03, 2014, 03:25:57 AM

Hey, just use the ignore button

It works really nicely.

Try it

Everyone should put Emule on ignore

No, we shouldn't. It's quite funny to watch him working so hard trying to initiate panic sell. He is also a very good example of what ppl become when they sell NXTs as cheap as he did.

ChuckOne

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82

Quote from: Emule on March 02, 2014, 06:31:22 PM

Quote from: newsilike on March 02, 2014, 06:13:18 PM

Quote from: Mises_77 on March 02, 2014, 05:48:28 PM

In the latest LetsTalkBitcoin podcast (88), NXT gets a small mention..

http://letstalkbitcoin.com/e88-gox-gox-gox-gox-gox-gox-gox/#.UxOzX-NdXkk
(Ethereum Evangelist Joel Dietz, about 36 mins in)

They aren't going to know what hit 'em Grin

These people seem to be not really aware of Nxt... I guess Cheesy

I would be scared as an Ethereum guy^^

nobody is aware of nxt thanks to epic failing marketing

they burn nxt with zero result and wrong approach but nobody dare to tell

marketing priority must be get fresh money in to nxt but money is flowing out of nxt due constant selling.

What do you suggest then?

Eadeqa

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Quote from: BitcoinForumator on March 03, 2014, 03:22:38 AM

Quote from: Emule on March 03, 2014, 03:20:09 AM

Quote from: weichao on March 03, 2014, 02:56:48 AM

Quote from: wakasaki808 on March 03, 2014, 02:18:13 AM

Quote from: chihao87 on March 03, 2014, 02:11:25 AM

Is there any new updates, projects on NXT? any progress?

Cryptsy added NXT

Yeah, right. But it seems the price doesnt go up. I may need be more patient.

epic fail marketing again, when one will finaly stand up and do something!

STFU and do it yourself.

(oh right, you're only experienced in whining and not much else)

Hey, just use the ignore button

It works really nicely.

Try it

Everyone should put Emule on ignore

Emule

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: BitcoinForumator on March 03, 2014, 03:22:38 AM

Quote from: Emule on March 03, 2014, 03:20:09 AM

Quote from: weichao on March 03, 2014, 02:56:48 AM

Quote from: wakasaki808 on March 03, 2014, 02:18:13 AM

Quote from: chihao87 on March 03, 2014, 02:11:25 AM

Is there any new updates, projects on NXT? any progress?

Cryptsy added NXT

Yeah, right. But it seems the price doesnt go up. I may need be more patient.

epic fail marketing again, when one will finaly stand up and do something!

STFU and do it yourself.

all i see is big stakeholders dumping:

dump on bter
dump on cryptsy
dump on dgex

nxt is dead for sure Cheesy

allwelder

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1004

Quote from: Fatih87SK on March 03, 2014, 02:22:14 AM

Quote from: wakasaki808 on March 03, 2014, 02:18:52 AM

Is there any work being done to get BTC38 to add NXT? Now that Cryptsy has added NXT.

Allwelder said something about that. He said that NXT had to be registered somewhere else before BTC38 can add it.

He said something about voting on a website, but it was Chinese and didn't understand what I should do.

Yes,we have voted for their database adding(not trading system) recently,but failed.

I have contacted BTC38 now,and they said they will continue to learn and wait for more detailed info of Nxt release.

BTC38 also constructed a QQ(like skype) group for talking about Nxt,and I will continue to keep contacting with them.

If any news,will post here.

BitcoinForumator

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Emule on March 03, 2014, 03:20:09 AM

Quote from: weichao on March 03, 2014, 02:56:48 AM

Quote from: wakasaki808 on March 03, 2014, 02:18:13 AM

Quote from: chihao87 on March 03, 2014, 02:11:25 AM

Is there any new updates, projects on NXT? any progress?

Cryptsy added NXT

Yeah, right. But it seems the price doesnt go up. I may need be more patient.

epic fail marketing again, when one will finaly stand up and do something!

STFU and do it yourself.

(oh right, you're only experienced in whining and not much else)

2Kool4Skewl

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 250

Quote from: CIYAM on March 03, 2014, 03:07:07 AM

Quote from: 2Kool4Skewl on March 03, 2014, 02:30:47 AM

What would differentiate a "Class A" asset from a "Class B" asset?

perhaps we could limit Class B Asset to not being able to have as many units/shares.

I see.

Quote from: bitcoinpaul on March 03, 2014, 03:09:38 AM

Although I like the idea, let us clarify what our goal is with this.

It's an interesting idea.

I think we should all remember BCNext's vision for NXT and his thoughts regarding fees. I agree with BCNext wanting NXT fees to be low. Imo, 1000 NXT for asset name registration is too high. I think you should be able to register an asset name for 1 NXT. By setting NXT fees high, we are excluding people from NXT because they cannot afford the registration price. NXT should be for everyone.

Come-from-Beyond

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1010

Newbie