Quote
CODE
WTF?
Looks like somebody hates you so much, if you actually are the guy owning the account: "4747512364439223888"
He is, he already provided proof.
Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 89. (Read 2761645 times)
WTF?
Looks like somebody hates you so much, if you actually are the guy owning the account: "4747512364439223888"
He is, he already provided proof.
Quote
CODE
WTF?
Looks like somebody hates you so much, if you actually are the guy owning the account: "4747512364439223888"
Hello
I've just dumped some zombiecoins and now I'm on board
Let's see how this rocket works ;]
I've just dumped some zombiecoins and now I'm on board
Let's see how this rocket works ;]
4747512364439223888 is rich 
Just realised I got this in a PM
****
hi
friend
sorry to disturb you, can you post a message for me, then i will pay you 0.005 BTC only for reply under a thread you do not to do anything more thanks.
the thread link：https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-communitycoin-comm-fair-free-distribution-pure-pos-wallet-updated-529481
you can post under the thread link, just reply a message under the thread something like:
i love community coin and i think pos coin is very green, want to join the community coin high train,
and something like, do some promotion in my country etc.., you can post the reason why you want to join the community coin, you can post what you like.
when you help me post a message, just PM me your bitcoin address, i will send you 0.005 btc ASAP.
thank you very much! much appreciated.
ps:
question：why i need your help?
because i want to get some community coin, but i am not qualified, so thank you very much for your help!
best wish!
thanks
*****
Some kind of scam?? A viral marketing campaign so people like me spread it about asking if it is a scam???
I dunno.
****
hi
friend
sorry to disturb you, can you post a message for me, then i will pay you 0.005 BTC only for reply under a thread you do not to do anything more thanks.
the thread link：https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-communitycoin-comm-fair-free-distribution-pure-pos-wallet-updated-529481
you can post under the thread link, just reply a message under the thread something like:
i love community coin and i think pos coin is very green, want to join the community coin high train,
and something like, do some promotion in my country etc.., you can post the reason why you want to join the community coin, you can post what you like.
when you help me post a message, just PM me your bitcoin address, i will send you 0.005 btc ASAP.
thank you very much! much appreciated.
ps:
question：why i need your help?
because i want to get some community coin, but i am not qualified, so thank you very much for your help!
best wish!
thanks
*****
Some kind of scam?? A viral marketing campaign so people like me spread it about asking if it is a scam???
I dunno.
Code:
[2014-04-01 03:16:28.308] DEBUG: Account 4747512364439223888 generated block 883316585799598769
[2014-04-01 03:20:19.187] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 6326029658408093531
[2014-04-01 03:20:20.206] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 2309669808956184424
[2014-04-01 03:20:21.215] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 17314544940487728271
[2014-04-01 03:20:22.241] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 4806165267630557546
[2014-04-01 03:20:23.254] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 1304528212305268541
[2014-04-01 03:20:24.263] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 14866728664621003414
[2014-04-01 03:20:25.276] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 6326029658408093531
[2014-04-01 03:20:26.286] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 1922326849187390871
[2014-04-01 03:20:27.300] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 4510001479212872206
[2014-04-01 03:20:28.308] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 12401551499551051735
[2014-04-01 03:20:29.324] DEBUG: Account 4747512364439223888 generated an incorrect block.
[2014-04-01 03:20:30.340] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 6326029658408093531
[2014-04-01 03:20:31.360] DEBUG: Account 4747512364439223888 generated an incorrect block.
[2014-04-01 03:20:32.364] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 15603469897415173185
[2014-04-01 03:20:33.380] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 14673313002777053673
[2014-04-01 03:20:34.394] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 6326029658408093531
...
[2014-04-01 06:37:51.476] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 6326029658408093531
[2014-04-01 06:37:52.484] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 14604406622408483948
[2014-04-01 06:37:53.513] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 14604406622408483948
[2014-04-01 06:37:54.520] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 9516870800314478707
[2014-04-01 06:37:55.522] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 10767892997588883070
[2014-04-01 06:37:56.531] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 14604406622408483948
[2014-04-01 06:37:57.543] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 10356095191974054751
[2014-04-01 06:37:58.551] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 12356304353855807132
[2014-04-01 06:37:59.563] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 14604406622408483948
[2014-04-01 06:38:00.575] DEBUG: Account 4747512364439223888 generated an incorrect block.
[2014-04-01 06:38:01.596] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 10162318916029473577
[2014-04-01 06:38:02.612] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 14604406622408483948
[2014-04-01 06:38:03.618] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 13559112696682957969
[2014-04-01 06:38:04.630] DEBUG: Account 4747512364439223888 generated an incorrect block.
[2014-04-01 06:38:05.636] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 14604406622408483948
Hey CFB, did he do any harm?
Yes, he broke forging for 4747...888 guy with 50M who was forging 20% of all the blocks.
Code:
[2014-04-01 03:16:28.308] DEBUG: Account 4747512364439223888 generated block 883316585799598769
[2014-04-01 03:20:19.187] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 6326029658408093531
[2014-04-01 03:20:20.206] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 2309669808956184424
[2014-04-01 03:20:21.215] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 17314544940487728271
[2014-04-01 03:20:22.241] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 4806165267630557546
[2014-04-01 03:20:23.254] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 1304528212305268541
[2014-04-01 03:20:24.263] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 14866728664621003414
[2014-04-01 03:20:25.276] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 6326029658408093531
[2014-04-01 03:20:26.286] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 1922326849187390871
[2014-04-01 03:20:27.300] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 4510001479212872206
[2014-04-01 03:20:28.308] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 12401551499551051735
[2014-04-01 03:20:29.324] DEBUG: Account 4747512364439223888 generated an incorrect block.
[2014-04-01 03:20:30.340] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 6326029658408093531
[2014-04-01 03:20:31.360] DEBUG: Account 4747512364439223888 generated an incorrect block.
[2014-04-01 03:20:32.364] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 15603469897415173185
[2014-04-01 03:20:33.380] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 14673313002777053673
[2014-04-01 03:20:34.394] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 6326029658408093531
...
[2014-04-01 06:37:51.476] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 6326029658408093531
[2014-04-01 06:37:52.484] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 14604406622408483948
[2014-04-01 06:37:53.513] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 14604406622408483948
[2014-04-01 06:37:54.520] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 9516870800314478707
[2014-04-01 06:37:55.522] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 10767892997588883070
[2014-04-01 06:37:56.531] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 14604406622408483948
[2014-04-01 06:37:57.543] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 10356095191974054751
[2014-04-01 06:37:58.551] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 12356304353855807132
[2014-04-01 06:37:59.563] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 14604406622408483948
[2014-04-01 06:38:00.575] DEBUG: Account 4747512364439223888 generated an incorrect block.
[2014-04-01 06:38:01.596] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 10162318916029473577
[2014-04-01 06:38:02.612] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 14604406622408483948
[2014-04-01 06:38:03.618] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 13559112696682957969
[2014-04-01 06:38:04.630] DEBUG: Account 4747512364439223888 generated an incorrect block.
[2014-04-01 06:38:05.636] DEBUG: Generate block failed: Duplicate hash of transaction 14604406622408483948
Is there a way to get info on more than the top 60 accounts on the blockchain explorer? Say, for example, I want to look at the top 100, or all accounts with over 1 million Nxt?
there are 131 account holding 1m Nxt and above.
cool! @ wesley
Would be great if the client "installation" could generate a desktop shortcut with the nice Nxt logo, and 1 click takes me to the login screen with NRS running as well!
Would be great if the client "installation" could generate a desktop shortcut with the nice Nxt logo, and 1 click takes me to the login screen with NRS running as well!
I am getting close to release candidate for multigateway
I would like somebody that is fluent in C and familiar with bitcoind to do a code review
James
I would like somebody that is fluent in C and familiar with bitcoind to do a code review
James
I can also make it so that the browser opens automatically to the correct page.
This alone would enough justification. But a .bat could do the same thing right?
Yes we can probably do it with a bat. But perhaps it should be done in the java code.
Check if launched via bat or run.sh (via an environment variable), and then launch the browser when NRS is started.
Think of user-friendliness and not nerd standard.
Not easier but more trustable. At least for me, I'd rather run an .exe than a .bat.
Actually I would trust a .bat any day over an .exe (at least a .bat is *text* so I can *read it*).
Well that's true. I'm just a user here.
I can also make it so that the browser opens automatically to the correct page.
This alone would be enough justification. But a .bat could do the same thing right?
Not easier but more trustable. At least for me, I'd rather run an .exe than a .bat.
Actually I would trust a .bat any day over an .exe (at least a .bat is *text* so I can *read it*).
Yep you are right, bat is readable so you can see if anything fishy is going on
Not easier but more trustable. At least for me, I'd rather run an .exe than a .bat.
Actually I would trust a .bat any day over an .exe (at least a .bat is *text* so I can *read it*).
Instead of having run.bat in the official release, why not include an exe?
Why would it be any "better" to have an .exe vs. a .bat file?
Oh wait a sec, never mind. I use windows way too little
I see now the bat is exactly the same. 
Photo of CfB:
Photo of Jean-Luc:
Photo of Jean-Luc:
Instead of having run.bat in the official release, why not include an exe?
Why would it be any "better" to have an .exe vs. a .bat file?
Not easier but more trustable. At least for me, I'd rather run an .exe than a .bat.
Somehow .bat always looks fishy to me. Just accustomed like this, not saying it's any different in terms of security.
Instead of having run.bat in the official release, why not include an exe?
Why would it be any "better" to have an .exe vs. a .bat file?
Jump to: