NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 991.

MyZhre

full member

Activity: 193

Merit: 100

Quote from: allwelder on February 09, 2014, 08:30:52 AM

Code:

[2014-02-09 21:18:55.677] Scanning blockchain...
[2014-02-09 21:19:09.888] ...Done
[2014-02-09 21:19:09.891] NRS 0.7.2 started successfully.
[2014-02-09 21:22:02.461] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 12792071761809604839 at
height 62244 received from 88.198.142.92, blacklisting
[2014-02-09 21:22:02.462] DEBUG: Blacklisting 88.198.142.92 because of: Invalid
timestamp: 6657738 current time is 6657722, previous block timestamp is 6657684

what does this mean? It does not affect the forging,right?

I'm the owner of 88.198.142.92, I upgrade the vps to 0.7.2 several hours ago, so far works fine,
don't known why the invalid timestamp.

BloodyRookie

hero member

Activity: 687

Merit: 500

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on February 09, 2014, 06:01:46 AM

Quote from: Jean-Luc on February 09, 2014, 05:38:08 AM

Quote from: gimre on February 09, 2014, 04:12:59 AM

Also, could you look, at this message, not sure if you've seen it:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5002245

I don't understand this code so I cannot change it. It is up to CfB and BCNext to decide if and when this should be fixed.

Only crypto audit will tell if it's a bug or not. Right now there is another way to fix unverifable signatures in Crypto.sign(). We can't use BloodyRookie's fix without a formal proof that this won't break Curve25519 security. Actually, if the fix gets rid of unverifable signatures completely then we shouldn't use it. It's a normal situation that sometimes we have to recompute signatures generated with EC-KCDSA.

It is a bug. Did you even read my post completely? You need only basic knowledge in algebra to understand it.
The EC-KCDSA signature algorith can fail sometimes that's why sign() returns a boolean value. But that happens very rarely and simply means v=(x-h)s = 0 mod q.
Maybe you should ask Doctor Evil Wink

gimre

legendary

Activity: 866

Merit: 1002

Quote from: ChuckOne on February 09, 2014, 08:37:05 AM

Quote from: gimre on February 09, 2014, 08:26:11 AM

It's not the problem with leaving, the problem is, that some people are running old versions, and the fork probably went for few days already.

Probably? Or for sure?

I don't know, I'm not on the fork Wink

We could ask mkmen, what does he see in recent blocks

martismartis

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1005

Just to confirm, my public node on Android TV stick running on 0.7.2

ChuckOne

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82

Quote from: Bitventurer on February 09, 2014, 08:40:04 AM

Epic!

salsacz

hero member

Activity: 490

Merit: 504

Quote from: ChuckOne on February 09, 2014, 08:38:08 AM

Quote from: salsacz on February 09, 2014, 08:28:20 AM

Quote

In order to create a new internet the central infrastructure should probably be a peer to peer social network, e-mail, search engine, cloud storage, file sharing and cryptocurrency

Is it possible to transform us to the app with peer to peer social network, e-mail, search engine, cloud storage and file sharing?

Probably not us, but NXT for sure.

thank you, so we are looking for developers of "search engine, cloud storage and file sharing?"

Bitventurer

sr. member

Activity: 491

Merit: 250

S P 8 D E

Bitventurer

sr. member

Activity: 491

Merit: 250

S P 8 D E

https://i.imgur.com/AjrIOD2.jpg

ChuckOne

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82

Quote from: salsacz on February 09, 2014, 08:28:20 AM

Quote

In order to create a new internet the central infrastructure should probably be a peer to peer social network, e-mail, search engine, cloud storage, file sharing and cryptocurrency

Is it possible to transform us to the app with peer to peer social network, e-mail, search engine, cloud storage and file sharing?

Probably not us, but NXT for sure.

It already is gerading the social part.

ChuckOne

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82

Quote from: gimre on February 09, 2014, 08:26:11 AM

Quote from: ChuckOne on February 09, 2014, 08:18:59 AM

Quote from: gimre on February 09, 2014, 07:59:17 AM

Quote from: mkmen on February 09, 2014, 07:51:49 AM

Quote from: Jean-Luc on February 09, 2014, 05:19:19 AM

Release 0.7.2

After update to 0.7.2 I ended up now 3 times in a row on a fork with just one block in last 4 days and insane targets, I let it run for about an hour now and it does not seem to be able to recover from that.

once on a fork, you'll most likely stay there. (allowed reorganization is only 720 in depth IIRC)

[...]

@Jean-Luc

What's the problem with leaving a fork?

It's not the problem with leaving, the problem is, that some people are running old versions, and the fork probably went for few days already.

Probably? Or for sure?

stereotype

legendary

Activity: 1554

Merit: 1000

Quote from: cryptolawyer on February 09, 2014, 08:22:38 AM

Quote from: TwinWinNerD on February 09, 2014, 07:29:39 AM

Quote from: BitcoinForumator on February 09, 2014, 07:28:19 AM

I've seen a couple of forging pools throughout this thread and noticed a possibitly of forging only by giving "forging rights" without giving the NXTs.

Has anyone one of you tried this and which pool did you use?

I am pretty sure that possibility was only discussed, it is not possible yet

I know a lot of feature requests are discussed at length on this thread, but several weeks ago I chimed in on a similar conversation, and I'll reiterate one observation here.

From this lawyer's perspective, the ability for NXT (or looking ahead, any asset on a ledger) to be held in one place but certain indicia of ownership or other rights to be separated and transferred elsewhere would be enormously useful.

Maybe its the right time that a crypto-friendly lawyer, formulate a framework ready for when it can be proved to the world that this new electronic asset transference, actually works. Wink

allwelder

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1004

Code:

[2014-02-09 21:18:55.677] Scanning blockchain...
[2014-02-09 21:19:09.888] ...Done
[2014-02-09 21:19:09.891] NRS 0.7.2 started successfully.
[2014-02-09 21:22:02.461] DEBUG: Failed to accept block 12792071761809604839 at
height 62244 received from 88.198.142.92, blacklisting
[2014-02-09 21:22:02.462] DEBUG: Blacklisting 88.198.142.92 because of: Invalid
timestamp: 6657738 current time is 6657722, previous block timestamp is 6657684

what does this mean? It does not affect the forging,right?

salsacz

hero member

Activity: 490

Merit: 504

Quote

In order to create a new internet the central infrastructure should probably be a peer to peer social network, e-mail, search engine, cloud storage, file sharing and cryptocurrency

Is it possible to transform us to the app with peer to peer social network, e-mail, search engine, cloud storage and file sharing?

allwelder

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1004

Quote from: gs02xzz on February 09, 2014, 08:14:41 AM

Quote from: allwelder on February 09, 2014, 05:08:58 AM

another forum have added Nxt
http://btc38bbs.gotoip55.com/forum.php?mod=forumdisplay&fid=76
And I am the moderator of Nxt Wink

Hi allwelder, can you not use the Future Coin as the Chinese translation for Nxtcoin since as many people mentioned before that Nxt is a reality already and it will confuse people with another coin which English name is really futurecoin and Chinese name is the future coin in Chinese as well? It is just IMHO.

yes ,I also think so and agree with you.
But the owner of the above website said they must set an Chinese name for every coin,so they set Nxt as 未来币;
I can contact them to modify the name if Nxt can have another Chinese name.

Come-from-Beyond

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1010

Newbie

Quote from: pinarello on February 09, 2014, 08:14:12 AM

Quote from: ChuckOne on February 09, 2014, 08:07:47 AM

Quote from: 2Kool4Skewl on February 09, 2014, 03:24:59 AM

NTX 90% HODL PROOF!

Proof of Hodling.

The more you hodl, the more blocks you are allowed to ~~forge~~.fogre

FIFY

LOL

gimre

legendary

Activity: 866

Merit: 1002

Quote from: ChuckOne on February 09, 2014, 08:18:59 AM

Quote from: gimre on February 09, 2014, 07:59:17 AM

Quote from: mkmen on February 09, 2014, 07:51:49 AM

Quote from: Jean-Luc on February 09, 2014, 05:19:19 AM

Release 0.7.2

After update to 0.7.2 I ended up now 3 times in a row on a fork with just one block in last 4 days and insane targets, I let it run for about an hour now and it does not seem to be able to recover from that.

once on a fork, you'll most likely stay there. (allowed reorganization is only 720 in depth IIRC)

[...]

@Jean-Luc

What's the problem with leaving a fork?

It's not the problem with leaving, the problem is, that some people are running old versions, and the fork probably went for few days already.

Come-from-Beyond

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1010

Newbie

Quote from: gimre on February 09, 2014, 07:35:25 AM

But you DO understand, that right now, when the code is refactored, one simply needs to replace Curve25519.class.

People that will do that will ONLY benefit, from doing so (no more "generated incorrect block" messages == profit).
And verify WILL work on such blocks...

Incorrect block error occurs not so often to create a problem.

cryptolawyer

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

Quote from: TwinWinNerD on February 09, 2014, 07:29:39 AM

Quote from: BitcoinForumator on February 09, 2014, 07:28:19 AM

I've seen a couple of forging pools throughout this thread and noticed a possibitly of forging only by giving "forging rights" without giving the NXTs.

Has anyone one of you tried this and which pool did you use?

I am pretty sure that possibility was only discussed, it is not possible yet

I know a lot of feature requests are discussed at length on this thread, but several weeks ago I chimed in on a similar conversation, and I'll reiterate one observation here.

From this lawyer's perspective, the ability for NXT (or looking ahead, any asset on a ledger) to be held in one place but certain indicia of ownership or other rights to be separated and transferred elsewhere would be enormously useful.

ChuckOne

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

☕ NXT-4BTE-8Y4K-CDS2-6TB82

Quote from: gimre on February 09, 2014, 07:59:17 AM

Quote from: mkmen on February 09, 2014, 07:51:49 AM

Quote from: Jean-Luc on February 09, 2014, 05:19:19 AM

Release 0.7.2

After update to 0.7.2 I ended up now 3 times in a row on a fork with just one block in last 4 days and insane targets, I let it run for about an hour now and it does not seem to be able to recover from that.

once on a fork, you'll most likely stay there. (allowed reorganization is only 720 in depth IIRC)

[...]

@Jean-Luc

What's the problem with leaving a fork?

gs02xzz

full member

Activity: 221

Merit: 100

Quote from: allwelder on February 09, 2014, 05:08:58 AM

another forum have added Nxt
http://btc38bbs.gotoip55.com/forum.php?mod=forumdisplay&fid=76
And I am the moderator of Nxt Wink

Hi allwelder, can you not use the Future Coin as the Chinese translation for Nxtcoin since as many people mentioned before that Nxt is a reality already and it will confuse people with another coin which English name is really futurecoin and Chinese name is the future coin in Chinese as well? It is just IMHO.

Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 991. (Read 2761637 times)