Topic: OBSERVATIONS WITH SOME IEO'S - page 2. (Read 663 times)
I observed some IEO'S are not trusted also and many of investors are much preferring investments in ICO, because of this IEO'S dropping price after listing so its almost similar with ico so investors are investing still in icos.
These observations are interesting. But not all IEOs follow this performance. The most profitable ones are those that are hosted on Binance. I have not seen a successful IEO coming from Dobi exchange not to talk of Bittrex
IEO is another risky trend in crypto, after ICO trend in 2017. IMO, to invest in IEOs, if you want, you should take into consideration some following factors of exchanges that run their IEOs:
- Reliability due to their history till the open of their IEOs. Young exchanges don't have long history enough to assess their reliability.
- Total volume of exchange. High or medium volume is good enough.
- Past initiatives of exchange's CEO and team. How fast they response to hot trends in crypto, and how they lead the crypto trends (like Binance did many times)
- Reliability due to their history till the open of their IEOs. Young exchanges don't have long history enough to assess their reliability.
- Total volume of exchange. High or medium volume is good enough.
- Past initiatives of exchange's CEO and team. How fast they response to hot trends in crypto, and how they lead the crypto trends (like Binance did many times)
everyone should do their research deeply before investing in ICO, STO or IEO
because all of that are crowdfunding methode in crypto world, and everyone know if not all project born in this indutsry is good buddy
we must select the right one before drop our money
IEO is another risky trend in crypto, after ICO trend in 2017. IMO, to invest in IEOs, if you want, you should take into consideration some following factors of exchanges that run their IEOs:
- Reliability due to their history till the open of their IEOs. Young exchanges don't have long history enough to assess their reliability.
- Total volume of exchange. High or medium volume is good enough.
- Past initiatives of exchange's CEO and team. How fast they response to hot trends in crypto, and how they lead the crypto trends (like Binance did many times)
- Reliability due to their history till the open of their IEOs. Young exchanges don't have long history enough to assess their reliability.
- Total volume of exchange. High or medium volume is good enough.
- Past initiatives of exchange's CEO and team. How fast they response to hot trends in crypto, and how they lead the crypto trends (like Binance did many times)
do you have guarantee if im did like your calculations, and after 30 i dont get my profit and only get my loss, if that happen do you want to take responsible for that buddy?
You know what dude, in every investment form here through buying coins or trading your coins in the exchange market whether in IEO, ICO, STO, had no assurance for us to get profit. This is depend actually into our understanding about it and belief.
I believe that agusiska wanted to test if OP is confident about his prediction which I see is reasonable since OP is somehow suggesting people to invest in IEO.
That was just His analysis and majority here who read this thread topic don't have clear of understanding about it.
Isn't it best to test that analysis by applying it practically so that people will understand it more?
do you have guarantee if im did like your calculations, and after 30 i dont get my profit and only get my loss, if that happen do you want to take responsible for that buddy?
You know what dude, in every investment form here through buying coins or trading your coins in the exchange market whether in IEO, ICO, STO, had no assurance for us to get profit. This is depend actually into our understanding about it and belief. That was just His analysis and majority here who read this thread topic don't have clear of understanding about it. So, it is all in our hands if we succeed or not to get profit.
Interesting observations, but I think that this scheme will not always work in the same way, because those IEOs that you observed were running on Binance. Most of the IEO on Binance are successful and participating in such IEO you will have more chances to make a profit than participating in IEO on the little-known exchanges. But if you consider only Binance, then your scheme is quite objective and it can be used to obtain the maximum possible profit.
There is no dogmatic approach to any form of investment, inasmuch as it is not a ponzi. If every trader registers the analysis you have prescribed @OP, manipulators will take advantage of it. Then you will see a change of trend.
Most of the IEOs I have seen pump immediately they are listed and you should know that there will surely be certain aberrations. Afterwards, they dump, before taking another cycle of pump and further corrections.
Most of the IEOs I have seen pump immediately they are listed and you should know that there will surely be certain aberrations. Afterwards, they dump, before taking another cycle of pump and further corrections.
Binance so far has recorded a good result generally with IEO's, the recently launched harmony_one IEO equally made a resounding profit, so far this does not apply to IEO's of other exchanges, I hope sooner others will have some good results too, this is gradually making ICO's unpopular and it is a good development
The projects presented did great performance because of the reputation of the exchange where they are being handled. But if you follow after 2 months or 6 months, would the results still be satisfying? How about those projects from Yobit or any other small exchanges? So the scenario presented is not true to all IEO projects. There are factors contributing such success - the name of the exchange, the project itself, the interest of traders, etc...
Don't forget the manipulations and shilling. Some of those IEO that were successful on Binance have a crappy github. They were so successful because they only offer around 6% of their total coins, some percentage were allocated to some secret investors/manipulators so that these group will have the motivation to pump the IEO project right after the IEO is done. Then dump when they see that the target price is reached.
Let's just forget this analysis, since these IEO were conducted in binance, how many members here were able to buy the heavily contested binance IEO market? So it would have been better to use another exchange that is less competitive in sales and see if it does have a good return as you have extrapolated.
Sure, pick the IEOs with the good profit.
Let me tell you about one of the biggest IEO platforms globally,,, called Bittrex. Big exchange, big reputation, lots of people applying to be IEOs and lots of investors looking to cash in.
Check out their last 2 IEOs and see yourself how much losses $400 would make after 1 day, after 1 week,,, etc.
Let me tell you about one of the biggest IEO platforms globally,,, called Bittrex. Big exchange, big reputation, lots of people applying to be IEOs and lots of investors looking to cash in.
Check out their last 2 IEOs and see yourself how much losses $400 would make after 1 day, after 1 week,,, etc.
That's one good sample analysis. Binance has been sucessful in boosting the price of any tokens it raises funds for from its launchpad. Most of these coins have made partial fund raising from Binance launchpad while the rest from ICO or other IEO. So, the period between the completion of IEO on binance and listing also is tradable on other exchanges or could be bought from the ICO.
Which is right the advantage of using the IEO's from binance launchpad makes better results for the investors and traders whosupported and take the risk of placing their money, always do your DYOR before putting your money inside this investment.
I think the purpose of which project is being created has been bastardized which is so bad to speak of, we are too focused on what we stand to gain once the coin hits the exchange, and not focusing on what the project has to offer to the crypto community in general. We need to start changing our mindset towards how we see the crypto market and project being launched, because we might end up turning a good project that will change our lives to shitcoin.
As what we observe on Binance Launchpad IEO some of the token make a good pump up or sucessful specially the last IEO the Harmony (one) based on your analysis/calculation participating in IEO make a good ROI by just holding the token on few days, but not all exchange site that offer IEO will give you a good ROI stay away from untrusted exchange site its better to participate on trusted like Binance and Houbi.
That's one good sample analysis. Binance has been sucessful in boosting the price of any tokens it raises funds for from its launchpad. Most of these coins have made partial fund raising from Binance launchpad while the rest from ICO or other IEO. So, the period between the completion of IEO on binance and listing also is tradable on other exchanges or could be bought from the ICO.
Binance so far has recorded a good result generally with IEO's, the recently launched harmony_one IEO equally made a resounding profit, so far this does not apply to IEO's of other exchanges, I hope sooner others will have some good results too, this is gradually making ICO's unpopular and it is a good development
The projects presented did great performance because of the reputation of the exchange where they are being handled. But if you follow after 2 months or 6 months, would the results still be satisfying? How about those projects from Yobit or any other small exchanges? So the scenario presented is not true to all IEO projects. There are factors contributing such success - the name of the exchange, the project itself, the interest of traders, etc...
Binance so far has recorded a good result generally with IEO's, the recently launched harmony_one IEO equally made a resounding profit, so far this does not apply to IEO's of other exchanges, I hope sooner others will have some good results too, this is gradually making ICO's unpopular and it is a good development
The projects presented did great performance because of the reputation of the exchange where they are being handled. But if you follow after 2 months or 6 months, would the results still be satisfying? How about those projects from Yobit or any other small exchanges? So the scenario presented is not true to all IEO projects. There are factors contributing such success - the name of the exchange, the project itself, the interest of traders, etc...
Sadly to say but most of the tokens are based on Bitcoin's price growth because if it goes down all of the altcoins follow too so it's hard to tell that this would happen all the time or most of the time.
you've use terms and acronyms that most of the people here don't understand
you've use terms and acronyms that most of the people here don't understand
Binance so far has recorded a good result generally with IEO's, the recently launched harmony_one IEO equally made a resounding profit, so far this does not apply to IEO's of other exchanges, I hope sooner others will have some good results too, this is gradually making ICO's unpopular and it is a good development
It all looks very cool, but I don’t think it’s as easy as it looks. It also surprises me that there is so much hype around any IEO Binance.
There’s a hype on every IEO on binance now because they believe its a good development so most of the new project there are being sold out for a short period but I think someone is also manipulating it. We can make profit if we are able to buy, its good to play like this buy don’t expect to happen this every time and also expect that you can still lose money. Jump to: