Author

Topic: Obyte: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments - page 239. (Read 1234271 times)

jr. member
Activity: 84
Merit: 1
This is an interesting blogpost from Dan Hughes (the lead developer of Radix) writing about why DAG coins (like Byteball) will not scale.

https://www.radixdlt.com/post/dags-dont-scale-without-centralization

Byteball is named in only one sentence and it concludes that Byteball (and Iota) are not very censorship resistant.

    "At present, the only way for a DAG to guarantee against double spending and 34% attacks is with the aid of a centralized authority. Byteball, another DAG, has 12 ‘Witness Nodes’ and IOTA has ‘The Coordinator’. These tools mean that the networks are not censorship resistant and that, should the centralized authority be compromised, the network would be vulnerable to an attack from the centralized state itself."

Tonych could you enlighten us about this vulnerability about being censhorship resistance?

#16 in the whitepaper https://byteball.org/Byteball.pdf

I don't think that conclusion is being made with a full understanding of the platform.
16. Censorship...... Only the majority of witnesses can effectively impose forbidden content rules – if users choose such witnesses

government is able to put pressure on public witnesses. And they will simply refuse to be witnesses. In this case it will be almost impossible to find a suitable replacement for them

I don't think there is an inherent deficiency after considering the following. While it is desired at this moment in time that witnesses are publicly known persons you'll find by reading the whitepaper this is not a requirement. Nor is it coded into the protocol. New witnesses could hide real world identifies to avoid government pressure. If attacked (politically or otherwise) the function of witnesses can adapt.

Sure... if all the witnesses colluded at once then censorship exists. But I don't think this risk is inherently higher for Byteball than any POW where pools dominate hashing power or POS where the majority of coins are controlled by insiders.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1307
The problem has been fully identified by Tony. It is OK now. Back to normal.
Thanks for solving this problem and the Info here!  Cool
sr. member
Activity: 327
Merit: 250
The Best Investment Deserves The Largest Exposure

16. Censorship...... Only the majority of witnesses can effectively impose forbidden content rules – if users choose such witnesses

government is able to put pressure on public witnesses. And they will simply refuse to be witnesses. In this case it will be almost impossible to find a suitable replacement for them



It's a good critique. I think the answer is not in denying this vulnerability, as it is true, but being aware of the vulnerabilities of the alternative validation mechanisms POW and POS.


With POW as well as POS, anyone can get a hold of the majority of the validation/hashing power, as long as you spend the money.

And so people with outside interests may be financially motivated to spend the required amount to destroy it, and can do so fully anonymously.

This will be much harder in a system where your identity is required, and a strong outside reputation as well, as they then lose their outside reputation too.


That being said, I would prefer to see POS instead of witnesses as it is harder to take down with regulations/gov pressure.

In the end though I think adoption depends much more on other factors than the security of the network.

User friendliness, business model, fees, functionality etc.

Think Byteball comes out overall very positively.


And ofcourse over time the gov thread will go down for private currencies as it becomes more a legalized industry less and less at risk against gov attack, comparable to marihuana production in USA today.
hero member
Activity: 1442
Merit: 578

I didn't receive my bb from beeb bot. Tried the resend id procedure, but it says "No such batch can be resent."

Batch number is 4437.

What should i do?

We are still investigating with Tony why Blackbytes delivery is so delayed. I see you have received your Blackbytes in the meantime.

Thank you for using BEEB!

The problem has been fully identified by Tony. It is OK now. Back to normal.

I confirm i received my blackbytes.

Thanks for solving this problem. Will try BEEB again.
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 500
In case Byteball is certainly a shitcoin, why do Cryptopia take all their consumers' GBYTE build up deposit ?
sr. member
Activity: 397
Merit: 250
withdraws are finally working on cryptopia

#pending

completed.


AFT7Q54KNYEFTOKLK62FVI7JLCE5H46C



any old dust appreciated!!

Best bit of Byteball news for a while. Sent you a million bytes!  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1672
Merit: 1046
Here we go again
It's painful to look like a coin loses its value at such pace Sad 50% per week?) is it already floor? or will we go down until it becomes worthless?
+1

I still blame the shitty setup of the Airdrop fo dis.
sr. member
Activity: 510
Merit: 260
Does Airdrop has been completely stopped from byteball team?
and how to sell blackbytes

You can sell your blackbytes on http://beeb-bot.com
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 500
Does Airdrop has been completely stopped from byteball team?
and how to sell blackbytes
sr. member
Activity: 510
Merit: 260

I didn't receive my bb from beeb bot. Tried the resend id procedure, but it says "No such batch can be resent."

Batch number is 4437.

What should i do?

We are still investigating with Tony why Blackbytes delivery is so delayed. I see you have received your Blackbytes in the meantime.

Thank you for using BEEB!

The problem has been fully identified by Tony. It is OK now. Back to normal.
legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1001
withdraws are finally working on cryptopia

#pending

completed.


AFT7Q54KNYEFTOKLK62FVI7JLCE5H46C



any old dust appreciated!!
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 635
[
Send Bytes to your friends using only their email address, a key reason Paypal became a giant
https://medium.com/byteball/sending-cryptocurrency-to-email-5c9bce22b8a9


Please retweet https://twitter.com/ByteballOrg/status/974591124177334278


Yup, Paypal became a giant  because his ability to send money, but, unfortunately Bytes are not money as no one  accepts them in exchange for goods. (A few merchants don't count). Sorry, but  all things are upside down in Byteball.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1055



Send Bytes to your friends using only their email address, a key reason Paypal became a giant
https://medium.com/byteball/sending-cryptocurrency-to-email-5c9bce22b8a9


Please retweet https://twitter.com/ByteballOrg/status/974591124177334278

legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1055


Bank4YOU Group adds Byteball to their list of accepted fiat and crypto currencies for their ICO, a Mobile Money Remittance System.

Bank4YOU just implemented the option to purchase BFY tokens with Byteball Bytes.
Read all about it on their website https://bank4you.io/

Please retweet https://twitter.com/CryptKeeperBTT/status/974278017710215170
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1548
Get loan in just five minutes goo.gl/8WMW6n
It's painful to look like a coin loses its value at such pace Sad 50% per week?) is it already floor? or will we go down until it becomes worthless?
full member
Activity: 630
Merit: 103
This is an interesting blogpost from Dan Hughes (the lead developer of Radix) writing about why DAG coins (like Byteball) will not scale.

https://www.radixdlt.com/post/dags-dont-scale-without-centralization

Byteball is named in only one sentence and it concludes that Byteball (and Iota) are not very censorship resistant.

    "At present, the only way for a DAG to guarantee against double spending and 34% attacks is with the aid of a centralized authority. Byteball, another DAG, has 12 ‘Witness Nodes’ and IOTA has ‘The Coordinator’. These tools mean that the networks are not censorship resistant and that, should the centralized authority be compromised, the network would be vulnerable to an attack from the centralized state itself."

Tonych could you enlighten us about this vulnerability about being censhorship resistance?

#16 in the whitepaper https://byteball.org/Byteball.pdf

I don't think that conclusion is being made with a full understanding of the platform.
16. Censorship...... Only the majority of witnesses can effectively impose forbidden content rules – if users choose such witnesses

government is able to put pressure on public witnesses. And they will simply refuse to be witnesses. In this case it will be almost impossible to find a suitable replacement for them
sr. member
Activity: 510
Merit: 260

I didn't receive my bb from beeb bot. Tried the resend id procedure, but it says "No such batch can be resent."

Batch number is 4437.

What should i do?

We are still investigating with Tony why Blackbytes delivery is so delayed. I see you have received your Blackbytes in the meantime.

Thank you for using BEEB!
jr. member
Activity: 84
Merit: 1
This is an interesting blogpost from Dan Hughes (the lead developer of Radix) writing about why DAG coins (like Byteball) will not scale.

https://www.radixdlt.com/post/dags-dont-scale-without-centralization

Byteball is named in only one sentence and it concludes that Byteball (and Iota) are not very censorship resistant.

    "At present, the only way for a DAG to guarantee against double spending and 34% attacks is with the aid of a centralized authority. Byteball, another DAG, has 12 ‘Witness Nodes’ and IOTA has ‘The Coordinator’. These tools mean that the networks are not censorship resistant and that, should the centralized authority be compromised, the network would be vulnerable to an attack from the centralized state itself."

Tonych could you enlighten us about this vulnerability about being censhorship resistance?

#16 in the whitepaper https://byteball.org/Byteball.pdf

I don't think that conclusion is being made with a full understanding of the platform.
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
This is an interesting blogpost from Dan Hughes (the lead developer of Radix) writing about why DAG coins (like Byteball) will not scale.

https://www.radixdlt.com/post/dags-dont-scale-without-centralization

Byteball is named in only one sentence and it concludes that Byteball (and Iota) are not very censorship resistant.

    "At present, the only way for a DAG to guarantee against double spending and 34% attacks is with the aid of a centralized authority. Byteball, another DAG, has 12 ‘Witness Nodes’ and IOTA has ‘The Coordinator’. These tools mean that the networks are not censorship resistant and that, should the centralized authority be compromised, the network would be vulnerable to an attack from the centralized state itself."

Tonych could you enlighten us about this vulnerability about being censhorship resistance?
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 635

Pre-Announcement

Byteball is in the process of establishing a legal entity in Switzerland/Lichtenstein. This is aimed at bringing marketing and business development to a new level. Consequently, to grow strategically we need a budget enabling us to make short term and medium term plans. We need to hedge against volatility and work in fiat. Byteball is following the best practices in the crypto market.

In very doubt of this. To become  legal financilal entitity the relevant financial regulations and rules should be amended accordingly, subject to prior review by both  National Council and  Federal Assembly of Switzerland.
Jump to: