Topic: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.11.0 - page 431. (Read 5805983 times)

#define CL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES                         -5

Combination of your current graphics requirements and your choice of settings for your hardware is too high.

 cgminer version 2.9.5 - Started: [2012-11-30 18:39:27]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):0.000 (avg):0.000h/s | Q:9  A:0  R:0  HW:0  E:0%  U:0.0/m
 TQ: 0  ST: 12  SS: 0  DW: 5  NB: 2  LW: 20  GF: 1  RF: 0  WU: 0.0
 Connected to coinotron.com with LP as user Nolo.5
 Block: 2eee5f52bb986e0aa827f861...  Started: [18:39:30]  Best share: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [S ]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  51.0C 1216RPM | OFF  / 0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 U:0.00/m I:18
 GPU 1:  44.5C 1244RPM | OFF  / 0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 U:0.00/m I:18
 GPU 2:  39.0C 1237RPM | OFF  / 0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 U:0.00/m I:18
 GPU 3:  39.5C 1270RPM | OFF  / 0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 U:0.00/m I:18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 [2012-11-30 18:39:27] Thread 1 being disabled
 [2012-11-30 18:39:28] Error -5: Enqueueing kernel onto command queue. (clEnqueu
eNDRangeKernel)
 [2012-11-30 18:39:28] GPU 2 failure, disabling!
 [2012-11-30 18:39:28] Thread 2 being disabled
 [2012-11-30 18:39:28] Error -5: Enqueueing kernel onto command queue. (clEnqueu
eNDRangeKernel)
 [2012-11-30 18:39:28] GPU 3 failure, disabling!
 [2012-11-30 18:39:28] Thread 3 being disabled
 [2012-11-30 18:39:30] LONGPOLL from pool 0 detected new block


What does this error -5 mean?  

Wow - got my first ignore 'change' on my display - always wondered what it shows.

That blunt stupidity just made my day. Thanks SUBstandard.

subSTANDARD being a dipshit again?

Hmmm...

You sir, imply some very serious allegations and I suggest you consult your lawyers before posting such drivel before I sue you for libel.

You are connecting to 50BTC.com and this is what 50BTC is sending you:
 [2012-12-01 09:29:51] HTTP hdr(X-Long-Polling): http://5.9.207.236:8331/LP                    

That address is where 50BTC's longpoll comes from. If you don't want to connect to there, use a different pool.

I'd say you've been compromised.  Did you get cgminer from a reputable source?

M

ZOMG!

 

It's a hack I put in there that sees your specific pool usernames and steals your coins ...

There is definitely a dark side to ASIC.  Mainly this will depend on the business practices of the vendors in how willing they are to milk the market while depreciation is ever present.

Even with power consumption GPU was a relatively safe bet.


It's unfortunate that ASIC wasn't taken on in a community effort.  ASIC's could have been marketed using a cost plus model instead of price point being indexed against price/difficulty.

The price/difficulty business model will suck (us dry).

Well the 7xxx were less than double the 6xxx

But the 6xxx were roughly about the same as the 5xxx weren't they?

... and if GPU's were still mining away when 8xxx's came out, I'd not be surprised if there wasn't anything like a 2x gain from 7xxx to 8xxx

As ckolivas mentioned, GPU BTC mining is not the target of the companies that produce the products
If it was, then the next GPU's would beat the ASICs ...

The resale and multipurpose nature of them is what makes the equation so different though. My 7970s are selling for more than half of what I bought them for. Though I had to invest the money in the first place, there is still that extra return on selling them at the end, provided you don't try to keep them forever.

All done!
So the issue was in APP SDK and DRIVER
On my XP only APP SDK 2.7+Catalyst 11.6 was succesful
All other combinations was not working
but cgminer gave me only 140 khash but reaper 410 on my 6950
it's all i could squeeze out of cgminer....((
reaper was better.. don't know why...

Ah ok. My bad.

I didn't say anyone was doing it.  I was simply responding to the "video cards are much less expensive" quote.  I could also say a 7970 will be equivalent of a 37GH/s bASIC.

M

Show me a single person who bought a 7990 for mining purposes.

@Meatball - While new video cards came out every 9-12 months, not all of them were *that* much better at mining. The 5xxx cards were great, and the 6xxx cards were only a minor improvement, if that. The 7xxx cards brought higher speed and lower power, but not enough to make the 5xxx useless or unprofitable in any way. I'm hoping ASICs will be similar to this: 2nd and 3rd gen ASICs might be faster and/or use less power, but the 1st gen will still be profitable for quite a while.

One of the oldest, most established, most respected, and wide spread dictionaries of all time for the English language is wrong because Luke Jr. doesn't agree with it.  If anyone needed proof that Luke Jr. was nothing but a self-centered, egotistical, deluded, douchbag I think that pretty much sums it up.

Not *that* much more expensive.  A 7990 will run you real close to what a 74GH/s bASIC will.

M

There's definitely some merit to this, but remember, the exact same thing happens with Video Cards, every 9-12 months the new GPU cards hit the market and are more efficient at mining.  Of course video cards are much less expensive than the current round of ASIC's and can be resold.

Your dictionary is wrong. Belief does not imply either evidence or lack thereof.