Sounds good -
but i have a question why try to do something radically new if a hard fork is required - why not do something that the market knows ( like i previously mentioned ) for example taking well known algos from the "X" bunch or the "Quark" type and mixing them into a new Random driven function?
then rename this your own?
The first 8 rounds of Salsa have successfully been broken with differential cryptanalysis.
Differential Cryptanalysis of Salsa20/8New Features of Latin Dances: Analysis of Salsa, ChaCha, and Rumba?When you think about it, as new as NeoScrypt would be considered, I wouldn't go as far as calling it radical.
It has simply been upgraded and optimised to be faster and more secure.
To be honest (opinion), the "market" is starting to lack innovation. These new myriad of algo's really only achieve one thing. Dodge the ASIC's and show off it's shiny new shoes.. That is not what we're trying to do.
We want ASIC's and FPGA's for NeoScrypt to be developed in time. Preferably open source and at an affordable price for the average miner. In fact, this is the reason why we decided to upgrade and fix scrypt as opposed to mashing together some new xAlgo.
Catch is, everyone needs more time for their gpu farms. By the end of the year, that is it for getting any ROI back, as the Scrypt ASIC's will be in control. NeoScrypt will create a short term safe haven for any coin that still wishes to remain profitable for their loyal miners.
Then when the NeoScrypt ASIC's arrive, ftc will stay but other coins may choose to move on.
the point is this :
Will the market see this as more of the "CPU only" reset that gives the designers of the function a distinct advantage over the rest of the market at inception as they will have an optimized GPU and the rest of the market will have whatever they can develop.
wouldn't there be risk that the market will see his as manipulation?
Ha!...
No GPU miner, no fork.
Once we see that enough of the major pools are ready for the switch, and the worldwide community is loud and clear that we're ready, then and only then, will the fork occur.
TL;DR
Isn't there Risk the market will see untested "new" algos as an attempt to manipulate with your own "optimized" miner when if the proposed solution really is ASIC avoidance is it not in front of you?
Represented in the now many many algos floating around which are well tested and being optimized by the market all the time.
don't get me wrong i support your move.
There are a number of individuals working very hard behind the scenes. This has been planned for quite some time now. It has been thoroughly tested, analysed, assessed, modified and re-tested etc.
Phoenixcoin will make the change first. In the coming days, the source will be released. At that point, the code will be open and we highly encourage anyone with the skills necessary to create the first open source GPU miner for NeoScrypt. I can assure who ever achieves this, will be generously compensated.
Come over to the ftc forum and let us continue the work of Satoshi.
Calem