Has anyone looked at the updated video on their website?
Yes......
I am happy to receive a beta unit for testing, I will report to the community if this is real.
Topic: [OFFICIAL LAUNCH]: Introducing Infinity Miners 900GH/S, 1200GH/S and 2400GH/S (Read 5519 times)
October 22, 2013, 03:14:02 PM
Yes......
I am happy to receive a beta unit for testing, I will report to the community if this is real.
October 22, 2013, 03:04:58 PM
Has anyone looked at the updated video on their website?
October 22, 2013, 02:35:43 PM
Can I join in?
NOT THE REAL DEAL
NOT THE REAL DEAL
October 22, 2013, 01:58:29 PM
I just noticed your signature, well-played
. October 22, 2013, 01:56:57 PM
BAN THIS BANANA
October 22, 2013, 01:54:42 PM
Lets fill this thread with it
October 22, 2013, 01:53:28 PM
October 22, 2013, 01:46:06 PM
Hello,
we are getting enough pre-orders and proving best products in the market. Once we start shipping our customers will surely post their feedbacks,Thanks.
Warm Regards,
Infinity Miner
www.infinity-miner.com
we are getting enough pre-orders and proving best products in the market. Once we start shipping our customers will surely post their feedbacks,Thanks.
Warm Regards,
Infinity Miner
www.infinity-miner.com
can you say scam?
October 22, 2013, 01:19:15 PM
Hello,
we are getting enough pre-orders and proving best products in the market. Once we start shipping our customers will surely post their feedbacks,Thanks.
Warm Regards,
Infinity Miner
www.infinity-miner.com
we are getting enough pre-orders and proving best products in the market. Once we start shipping our customers will surely post their feedbacks,Thanks.
Warm Regards,
Infinity Miner
www.infinity-miner.com
October 10, 2013, 04:12:09 PM
Regarding HW errors the miner had run just few minutes and you mostly see hardware errors more while mining with CPU and GPU. Good ASIC devices will have them very less. And in video after running for few minutes its not necessary that cgminer shows errors.
This statement is complete and utter crap. I don't think I have ever seen a H/W error while mining with a GPU or CPU except when there was an actual problem with the device. Typical H/W error rate on these devices is vanishingly close to 0%.
Conversely, I have never seen an ASIC mining device that did not regularly produce at least a ~1% H/W error rate.
Your statement above does not go a long way toward helping your credibility.
i personally think the only real credit they will get is if they send to prototypes out to a trusted user or 2 to verify and run... id be happy to do this
just checked 13 hw errors in 3 days XD
and before someone says its impossible ill prove BFL did atleast 1 good miner
October 10, 2013, 02:21:51 PM
This company is a scam please avoid
Not disagreeing but what is the evidence?
wheres your evidence its an actual business ? prove me wrong first moron!!
sorry for calling you a moron
, i just don't like to see people ripped off and theres some real idiots on this forum , not you as you actually agreed so sorry again for calling you a moron I didn't even offer an opinion just wanted to know why he thinks its a scam. Anyway apology accepted.
From what I have seen here I will not be risking any money with them.
October 10, 2013, 11:09:24 AM
October 10, 2013, 09:49:12 AM
Regarding HW errors the miner had run just few minutes and you mostly see hardware errors more while mining with CPU and GPU. Good ASIC devices will have them very less. And in video after running for few minutes its not necessary that cgminer shows errors.
This statement is complete and utter crap. I don't think I have ever seen a H/W error while mining with a GPU or CPU except when there was an actual problem with the device. Typical H/W error rate on these devices is vanishingly close to 0%.
Conversely, I have never seen an ASIC mining device that did not regularly produce at least a ~1% H/W error rate.
Your statement above does not go a long way toward helping your credibility.
October 10, 2013, 08:59:17 AM
Could be but why was your network diff showing 67.7M? That would imply the device in the video existed and mined months ago?
It's not the only thing dodgy in that video.
1. The username on btcguild is wrong, it would be infx1_1 not .1
2. The times in the bottom of the screen loop back (implying this is just a .bat script posing as cgminer)
3. Highest share 2, but bottom of the screen reports much higher accepted shares
4. WU 24, doesn't match the numbers it should be getting or the numbers in the individual miners
I'm sure there are more, nice try but gonna have to give it 2/10 must try harder
October 10, 2013, 08:29:48 AM
You idiots are only thread crapping because this offer is from Iran. Pathetic.
October 10, 2013, 07:52:53 AM
I love all the 5-10 post users saying shit like
"WOW, THIS COMPANY IS GREAT!"
nooooo, this company doesn't look dodgy AT ALL!
"WOW, THIS COMPANY IS GREAT!"
October 10, 2013, 04:57:32 AM
Indeed, *scratches chin*, it is a good idea ! Maybe my seniors also will be pleased if I am to consult with them about this. They will be very pleased with gold shredder. gold shredder, they will say, very please if you would use our money to make infinite bitcoin !
if only possible !
if only possible !
October 10, 2013, 04:46:04 AM
Makes no sense. If you have chips in hand you should sell now instead of Jan. Also did you just claim to have chips for 450 devices x 2.5TH or more than 60% of current total network?
The shipping date was decided Jan so there will be enough orders for one batch. But the shipping date can be changed to early if we get enough orders.
Its a good idea to point those chips to a pool. I will consult my seniors about this and post here what they have to say.
October 10, 2013, 04:43:12 AM
indeed the unit is not the same as the one in the knc video. still I call scam.
Jump to: