Topic: OGNasty deleting more violence (Latest lie: Jan 12, 2024) (Read 2464 times)

Anyone who has lost/donated any money can join the class action; personally I lost 2 BTC.  There is nothing I have to prove - OG gave it all to me in writing.

Even though I started this thread (OG turns on Theymos), you give credit to Loyce for discovering it?    

well then, I understand what your major point of concern is. I've also realized you're almost done with the compilation of an advanced site that'll possibly bear claims from anyone else that wants to attest to whether or not your allegations are true..


Vod, no shades on this but I'd like to ask;
^[1]Are you genuinely seeking for due justice on the perpetrators ?
^[2] Why do you think Theymos would (according to your claims) try to cover up Nasty's ass after such a huge embezzlement?
^[3]According to loyce' new discovery, OG doesn't even like Theymos so, how's the claims on ^[2] even possible?
I've been following up this case comprehensively like I always say and, I know that this is just the beginning. "There's nothing hidden under the sun"
Edit: Could you atleast make a more valid point to vindicate yourself as this is still an allegation rather than stalking him? Vod isn't just throwing unnecessary tantrums and we all know he's not mentally derailed as you may have it.

Theymos also never stood up to deny OGs claims I was a liar or scammer.   It's almost as if he runs on a "What OG said, happened" policy.   Normally no big deal but the IRS wants their share of the bitcoin you are injecting into their community.  :/

Lol, maybe he should just plead the 5th, and keep his mouth shut.  His ability to provide accuracy in his sentences is a bit suspicious. 

I'm starting to think I misread this in February. I thought OgNasty was accusing theymos of not calling me (LoyceV) a liar for accusing him (OgNasty) of stealing BTC from the treasury, but on second thought, it looks like he's admitting to stealing BTC from the treasury.

So, to analyse this post:
Those are OgNasty's words, not mine. If this is how he feels, that's on him.

Source, or it didn't happen.  Here's a hint for those new to this drama; it didn't happen.


You're encouraging him to blackmail someone who had recently suffered a stroke?  You must realize that's not exactly a moral high-horse you're riding there.


I think you're actions were to blame for the unleashing.  A little accountability goes a long way to ensure the integrity of one's character.  Despite your charisma, your business acumen, and your (self inflated) trust rating, I would never have any business dealings with you.  You've demonstrated your lack of integrity many times over.

This all stems from you using the forum's cold storage address to sign a message for some shitcoin airdrop.  You didn't do it as part of your "fiduciary duty," you did it to enrich yourself.  In fact, it was a dereliction of your fiduciary duty to pull the private key out of cold storage for your own personal gain.  This is what theymos referred to when he called you "tacky."  In my opinion it's a drastic understatement.

But what's worse; your inability (or unwillingness) to acknowledge your actions were wrong, and then continuously lying to subvert the discussion.

I know you're unlikely to respond to my post, because you have never yet responded to this very same, rational argument that I've made sevral times.

Remind anyone of how Donald Trump turned on Rudy G after all his help?    See my sig if you are confused; OG is confused a lot recently

I'm guessing this is the work you said Theymos was paying you for?   I wonder if he paid a known thief out of his personal funds or the forum ones?   So much for the IRS to investigate!

I am done with my investigation on this forum, and will not comment further unless they try another scam; it's out of my hands soon.   I will be locking this thread and posting one more message about why I distrust Theymos.   Then I am back to developing projects for bitcoin.  


You are dense.  Loyce wrote no such thing.  

I think the fact that both of them aren't happy with theymos means he is doing a good job. It's an impossible balancing act, being able to satisfy the egos of two conflicting, demanding personalities.

“A good compromise is when both parties are dissatisfied.” - Larry David

You would be wise to take your own advice.  So you're now admitting I didn't steal 7 BTC and you include people in your trust network that make this claim in negative trust ratings that they attribute to you?  If someone was leaving someone else a negative trust rating based on lies they were attributing to me I wouldn't include them in my trust network, but I'm not a dishonorable bitch like you are.  Anyone can research that you support the extortion attempts of me being made via the trust network.  You're absolutely a pathetic excuse for a man and I have no problem saying it.  I don't respect liars or bitches who hide behind others to do their dirty work, especially ones who stand behind the mentally ill and use them as a human shield.  Grow a pair.

Why don't you two just exchange negative trust and get it over with?   

Stop making thing up about me. If you can't find a link to prove it, it's safe to assume it only happened in your head.

I don’t dislike theymos. He did a lot of good for the forum in the early days. I just know theymos is not a man of his word and I don’t really respect that. He hasn’t stood up to call LoyceV a liar for what he’s said about me stealing BTC from the treasury. He didn’t live up to his threat to blackball the mentally ill guy from DT for his trust abuse. He set me up with making me an original DT member, asking me to keep the default trust network honest and then empowering the evil I was keeping out of DT, unleashing an army of trolls my way… This while going more than a year without paying me and then calling me tacky for doing my fiduciary duty. So I guess I have my reasons for the disrespect. The mentally ill guy is mad at theymos for what?

And also that theymos doesn't care about any of that, which is good.

If this was another forum (like you know what), probably anybody who disagrees with the admin would get banned. So we should be thankful that the "free speech" guarantee of Bitcointalk also covers arguments and disagreements, for better or for worse.

I noticed OgNasty and Vod both dislike theymos, and both for different reasons.

This forum is the sum of all people that contribute to it and in that sense it is simply not to beat. Everything else has its up and downsides. Especially the user experience is pretty antique and other stuff is also a little outdated. But that’s not what matters. As long as this forum can stay together it will still be a huge success. Because as I said it is only the infrastructure to all the people here and nothing more.
With that being said I always felt that the forum is run professionally. I have to admit however that I never really had a lot of insights behind the scenes.

It's just like US politics right now - a big joke.  The people at the top think they have the freedom to do whatever they want, and it will take an external power to force change.

I did not notice I was in the entertainment section of the forum until I opened this thread

So why didn't you do as you said, and get me some help?   (That's called a lie)

https://nastyscam.com <<- Launching within 4 weeks,  it will allow anyone to quickly verify the truth.

Welcome back from your ban, OG.   

No court would listen to this “case” because it is a clear case of a mentally ill person fabricating things in their head. There is no victim, no theft, no wrongdoing of any kind and it’s even all publicly provable on the blockchain. It isn’t a matter of hugging it out. It’s a matter of a mentally ill person needing to get help. Anyone who takes 10 minutes to do the research themselves can see this clearly. Instead people want to act like this is a feud. It isn’t. One side of the “feud” is mentally ill and acts like this is a life or death issue, the other side (me) couldn’t give a fuck about this. I am sorry the forum has to be subjected to this public display of mental illness.