Topic: Old Thead... - page 4. (Read 2874 times)
Speaking of which:
Very very good.
Anyone that is investing in ICOs should not be lured into investing just because there seems to be a huge amount of users posting positive things about the project. If it is constantly getting bumped up and unless it legit has a lot of publicity, it's probably using one of these thread bumping services.
This is against the rules of the forum, and should not be tolerated.
Anyone that is investing in ICOs should not be lured into investing just because there seems to be a huge amount of users posting positive things about the project. If it is constantly getting bumped up and unless it legit has a lot of publicity, it's probably using one of these thread bumping services.
This is against the rules of the forum, and should not be tolerated.
Legendary prank! I already figured it was staged but wanted to make sure your Ann threads would get compromised so that's why I wanted pm'ed for more 'information'.
Yeah, yeah, no. Good luck finding people to believe "but I only wanted to [insertExcuse]". Could have at least used cryptography. 
I should've but not at 12PM on my phone Anyway, I should stop trying to whiteknight on the internet because I seem to screw myself one way or another
Good job with this. I'm not averse to someone using snare tactics to pull potential scammers out of their holes. It'd be nice to know who the person is behind this, but I have my ideas and will respect confidentiality.
Did any of you knuckleheads actually believe someone would pay you that much just to friggin' bump a thread? It's amazing what happens when an offer of a lot of money is slapped down upon the table. People start turning into dweebs, more so than usual. Anyhow, props to OP for pulling this. Got a lot of respect for that.
Did any of you knuckleheads actually believe someone would pay you that much just to friggin' bump a thread? It's amazing what happens when an offer of a lot of money is slapped down upon the table. People start turning into dweebs, more so than usual. Anyhow, props to OP for pulling this. Got a lot of respect for that.
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 100
you don't believe me - I also never trust you
Primarily, I would like to offer this gift to Lauda for her/his contribution on the forum.
33.AT101ET
Positive trust. just like you "STUPID"
Legendary prank! I already figured it was staged but wanted to make sure your Ann threads would get compromised so that's why I wanted pm'ed for more 'information'.
Yeah, yeah, no. Good luck finding people to believe "but I only wanted to [insertExcuse]". Legendary prank! I already figured it was staged but wanted to make sure your Ann threads would get compromised so that's why I wanted pm'ed for more 'information'.
Yeah, yeah, no. Good luck finding people to believe "but I only wanted to [insertExcuse]". Legendary prank! I already figured it was staged but wanted to make sure your Ann threads would get compromised so that's why I wanted pm'ed for more 'information'.
Yeah, yeah, no. Good luck finding people to believe "but I only wanted to [insertExcuse]".
Legendary prank! I already figured it was staged but wanted to make sure your Ann threads would get compromised so that's why I wanted pm'ed for more 'information'.
Amazing work! I will also post down my proofs of a known service which could be using them IcoBrothers.I tried to get the account list by fooling them but didn't work out.Uploading our telegram conversations soon!
Now all we have to do is,find the names of those posters on the ICO threads and bang,tag all of them.
Now all we have to do is,find the names of those posters on the ICO threads and bang,tag all of them.
If you had waited for a month, you would receive messages from nearly 90% accounts of bitcointalk (including alts) 
Shocked to see Legendary members with their so-called "greentrust" working as bumping artists. BCT forum users are getting more and more corrupt these days.
Shocked to see Legendary members with their so-called "greentrust" working as bumping artists. BCT forum users are getting more and more corrupt these days.
LMAO!!! Lowlifes these days! God they are stupid! All these accounts didn't thought for once that an account name 'ANNBumping_needed' will really need boosting? LOL! They need to be banned straight away instead of just receiving the negative trust.
Quote
Just be careful, because some accounts only contacted you by asking the credibility of your promises.
Well i partially agree with you here, they might get away with the excuse that they were trying to find out who really needed that 'Boosting' and expose them but who will judge their intentions? I don't think more than 60 members contacted the buyer just because they were looking out for the community. 
I think it's safe to say that migueltiu accounts are all connected, why would he have a spreadsheet of members, and their addresses otherwise? Mysterious01 is in the spreadsheet and also confirmed he's in control of a lot of the accounts on the spreadsheet.
I doubt any account here contacted him for seeing the credibility are you trying to defend one of your alt accounts up there?.It was either to scam the user or to actually carry out the job for them, both unethical.
Thank you for showing that to the community. Just be careful, because some accounts only contacted you by asking the credibility of your promises. Also I don't think you're allowed to expose private messages in the forum? Anyway congrats for the job.
I doubt any account here contacted him for seeing the credibility are you trying to defend one of your alt accounts up there?.It was either to scam the user or to actually carry out the job for them, both unethical.
Thank you for showing that to the community. Just be careful, because some accounts only contacted you by asking the credibility of your promises. Also I don't think you're allowed to expose private messages in the forum? Anyway congrats for the job.
Quote the images then read through them. The accounts will forever be there and won't go anywhere. Look at images & the google spreadsheet (archived if taken down already). From there on you can see that there is an amount being payed to each user + you can link the amount up from the spreadsheet. The rest of the accounts are just those who contacted me...
EDIT - NEW:
I'm taking a look through all of the images now, and the spreadsheet has been made private already, so it's a good thing it was archived. At the moment it seems, Klf, and thinkdifferent have confirmed the accounts are connected by private messaging you on both of them and confirming that it's one person.
I've also got the archive from last night that I saved before going to sleep:
https://archive.is/U0hRY,
https://archive.is/iGL3z - Jengo
Unfortunately, the way you went about this and promising to pay upfront, probably means some of these accounts aren't connected, and the users who messaged you might of been there to scam.
The end result in either case is a negative rating. Unless you mean to imply that we don't tag attempted scammers? Almost all of these account are surely connected. I need more time to process the whole list.Attempted scammers should receive a negative, at the very least the accounts that messaged were either looking to scam, or looking to participate in what many would see as an unethical practice. I think an in depth look into the alternative accounts needs to be done though to see if there is any other evidence supporting this.
Quote the images then read through them. The accounts will forever be there and won't go anywhere. Look at images & the google spreadsheet (archived if taken down already). From there on you can see that there is an amount being payed to each user + you can link the amount up from the spreadsheet. The rest of the accounts are just those who contacted me...
EDIT - NEW: https://i.imgur.com/uDRFSV4.png
Unfortunately, the way you went about this and promising to pay upfront, probably means some of these accounts aren't connected, and the users who messaged you might of been there to scam.
The end result in either case is a negative rating. Unless you mean to imply that we don't tag attempted scammers? Almost all of these account are surely connected. I need more time to process the whole list.Attempted scammers should receive a negative, at the very least the accounts that messaged were either looking to scam, or looking to participate in what many would see as an unethical practice. I think an in depth look into the alternative accounts needs to be done though to see if there is any other evidence supporting this.
I agree with you that almost all these accounts, will be connected and controlled by the same person, but due caution needs to be taken to assure that they are.
Unfortunately, the way you went about this and promising to pay upfront, probably means some of these accounts aren't connected, and the users who messaged you might of been there to scam.
The end result in either case is a negative rating. Unless you mean to imply that we don't tag attempted scammers? Almost all of these account are surely connected. I need more time to process the whole list.
Unfortunately, the way you went about this and promising to pay upfront, probably means some of these accounts aren't connected, and the users who messaged you might of been there to scam. Especially some of the accounts which haven't received any trust. You should of got the accounts to prove they are connected, before exposing the list.
Jump to: