Pages:
Author

Topic: On "intrinsic value" and why it actually means "subjective value" - page 2. (Read 6129 times)

full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Intrinsic value means value that is intrinsic to that which gives value.

So, coke is it and it is coke? Tautology.

If A is required for B's survival, A has intrinsic value to B.

Things with intrinsic value to humans. Sun. Earth. Water. Oxygen. Nourishment.

If A is required for B's survival AND B prefers to survive, then B must acquire A. Thus, A is has value to B.

Intrinsic is entirely redundant here. The question of survivability is still a matter of personal preference.

You can use the word intrinsic without using the word value. An intrinsic property of gold is that it is malleable.

What's the difference between a property and an intrinsic property? Malleability is simply a property of gold.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003
I have no idea where people got this "intrinsic value" stuff from.  Something has value because we prescribe it value.  That is all.

I told you already where intrinsic value comes from. Try surviving without the star we call our Sun. It has intrinsic value to us. It's essential to our survival.

Sorry, I hadn't read your post Grin  I can't think of an argument against that; however, intrinsic value when applied to gold makes little sense, which is where I often see it coupled.  It has some handy qualities but nothing we couldn't live without.

I addressed gold in the same post! o_0

I'm going back to bed lol
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003
I have no idea where people got this "intrinsic value" stuff from.  Something has value because we prescribe it value.  That is all.

I told you already where intrinsic value comes from. Try surviving without the star we call our Sun. It has intrinsic value to us. It's essential to our survival.

Sorry, I hadn't read your post Grin  I can't think of an argument against that; however, intrinsic value when applied to gold makes little sense, which is where I often see it coupled.  It has some handy qualities but nothing we couldn't live without.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003
Hypothetically, a pill that absolved the body of a certain type of cancer would have an incredible amount of value.

However, because I have a cancer-free body, as do my peers and relatives, I prescribe it no value.

Thus, the value of said pill would be subjective.  The objective value would be the cost of production.

I have no idea where people got this "intrinsic value" stuff from.  Something has value because we prescribe it value.  That is all.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
intrinsic is its atoms. intrinsic means its real, either atoms or photons. intrinsic's value == weight or energy.

bitcoin is not real, it's just some numbers that ppl agree on. so no, its not intrinsic, sorry.
hero member
Activity: 836
Merit: 1007
"How do you eat an elephant? One bit at a time..."
From https://economicsandliberty.wordpress.com/2013/04/14/the-myth-of-intrinsic-value/

The Myth of "Intrisic Value"

Many folks make the argument that Bitcoin has no “intrinsic value”. What they fail to realize is that no thing has “intrinsic value” – not even gold. No thing has value in and of itself. Value is a verb. In order for something to have value it must be “valued” by someone.

Value is subjective.

Bitcoin is not “backed” by anything and neither is gold. Neither has to be backed by anything. Some people value gold for what it is and what it allows you to do with it. Some people value bitcoin for what it is and what it allows you to do with it.

Bitcoin is a new commodity created to serve the market demand for a better medium of exchange (https://economicsandliberty.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/bitcoin-a-new-commodity-created-to-serve-market-demand/).
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Aristotle wrote in his politics, roughly 2300 years ago

Quote
The uses of every possession are two, both dependent upon the thing itself, but not in the same manner, the one supposing an inseparable connection with it, the other not; as a shoe, for instance, which may be either worn, or exchanged for something else, both these are the uses of the shoe; for he who exchanges a shoe with some man who wants one, for money or provisions, uses the shoe as a shoe, but not according to the original intention, for shoes were not at first made to be exchanged. The same thing holds true of all other possessions; for barter, in general, had its original beginning in nature, some men having a surplus, others too little of what was necessary for them: hence it is evident, that the selling provisions for money is not according to the natural use of things; for they were obliged to use barter for those things which they wanted; but it is plain that barter could have no place in the first, that is to say, in family society; but must have begun when the number of those who composed the community was enlarged: for the first of these had all things in common; but when they came to be separated they were obliged to exchange with each other many different things which both parties wanted.

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/6762/6762-h/6762-h.htm

member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Philologically, you are absolutely correct.

It would be nice if the world worked that way...

As it is, using the language as it is spoken and commonly understood is much more useful.  Especially when trying to explain some of the finer points of the complexity that is bitcoin.
WiW
sr. member
Activity: 277
Merit: 250
"The public is stupid, hence the public will pay"
What is "intrinsic"?
According to Mirriam Webster: "belonging to the essential nature or constitution of a thing". We are talking about something absolute. The absolute property of a thing.

And what is "value"?
Here it is said to be "relative worth, utility, or importance". This is relative. The relative relation someone has with a thing.

So when someone says "intrinsic value", do they mean that something relative (value) can be absolute (intrinsic)?

Well, you see, "intrinsic value" is simply what a gold lover would call "intrinsic property that I value". Gold has intrinsic properties that are worth some people's time and effort. But if this gold lover would be stuck on a desert island thristy and hungry with nobody to help him or trade with, he would probably have no interest whatsoever in gold. Even though it is a powerful metal and conducts electricity.

So when people say "instrinsic value" what they mean is "intrsinsic property for which people usually assign value, but not everyone and not always". I call that subjective value.

See, if you gave me a piece of gold, I'd hold on to it. Not because I need it. I'd hold on to it because I know someone else will want it. Maybe that someone else wants it because they want to make a piece of jewlery. But even though I don't make jewlery, I still understand that this piece of gold has something intrinsic about it that makes it valuable to someone else.

The same can be said about sheep (for shepards), peanuts (for elephants), dollars (for coke sniffers), and bitcoins (for anyone with a computer or smartphone).

If you ever want to say "intrinsic value" ever again, please instead say "subjective value". And from now on you can say that bitcoins have "subjective value", because I personally am willing to give you work or money for them.
Pages:
Jump to: