Trust is feedback given to a user based on positive, negative, and neutral. Positive feedback is always good for anyone who is looking to do business in the forum. Negative feedback has many things like making others aware of the scammer or pointing out a troll and neutral feedback is to warn others here in the forum about the member. Trust doesn't equate to a ban whereas it is a way to identify a user in an anonymous environment. We don't know anyone here by their name or their identity and in such an environment trust is helpful to make others aware of that particular user. You would only get banned from the forum if you don't follow the rules and the biggest reason for getting banned is if you plagiarised content or you are trying to scam others.
BTW, I did check the post for which you got 2 merits and it seems you wrote a topic about a fake Electrum app on the Apple store. The thing is that you didn't provide the link to the fake Electrum app and still, you were given 2 Merits. I mean why? You then locked the topic after only one reply. This is unacceptable for someone new to the forum and I am assuming that you are an alt of someone.
Topic: -on trust issues (Read 147 times)
Is that true?
when you have 1000 merit whereas +0/=1/-4 this type a trust increases chances to loose the http://bitcointalk.org account?
I've seen lots of dude around nearby being upset with that !!!!
when you have 1000 merit whereas +0/=1/-4 this type a trust increases chances to loose the http://bitcointalk.org account?
I've seen lots of dude around nearby being upset with that !!!!
Once you violate the rules of the forum that may harm the forum and its users you are going to get banned, your trust rating will not cause you to lose your account from the ban, unless it is hacked.
These are the things that you cannot do if you have a bad trust rating, you cannot join a signature campaign, you cannot ask for a loan, people will not trust you when you offer services or products.
And these are the things that you can still do even if you have a bad trust rating, you can still join the discussion, you can open a new discussion and you can still open a new discussion and you can also receive merits.
If you're banned you cannot do anything.
Second chance will be given if the sin committed by any forum member reputable or not is just minor. But if they commit scamming,extortion or any big sin done for sure nothing to retrieve back and we see also a lot of cases happening here.
Sin doesn't have correlation with negative feedback, negative feedback is used for scammer, so you're actually agree a scammer doesn't deserve a second chance.- If you believe someone is a scammer, or someone is likely to scam, that deserves negative feedback. Please provide evidence.
- If you really hate someone and he's a terrible troll, that does not deserve negative feedback.
Quote
Also merit is just a number and this is just used to rank up so if people doesn't have plan to join on any campaigns since they are fine with current status since they are still earning good figures then they should be fine and don't worry about earning merit here.
It's true merit just a number, but most users active in this forum only to join a campaign.Now I'm curious, which negative tagged user with low merit and have a successful service in this forum?
Obviously, trust has nothing to do with one losing their account but rather their reputation. Although some people here have that both tags but it does not stops them from doing their task. What I just believe is that the trust system can sometimes stand as a barrier to someone who is devoted and committed to their engagements here but out of the fact that they are being misunderstood, something leads to something and that results to them having a tag to their accounts that is just it and it remains there only when the tagger decides to remove it after you must have proved yourself to be innocent of any allegations against you only be then will the account be free of such tag.
Even when you've got yourself many negative and neutral tags, that doesn't get you banned from the forum, what that implies is about the review left on your profile for any other persons that may come in contact with you or have anything to do with you while you're still here, what makes you out of the forum is when you go against the forum rules and regulations and the easiest one to do is to plagiarize, you can see they are two different things.
If not, those trust ratings do not truly define the person. There is always a second chance given to everyone, and there is a benefit of doubt if the person, after receiving all those bad ratings, still continues to do some good in the community.
It might be hard to trust them when it comes to financial deals, but they can still make some good names even with those negative ratings by being productive in any way that they can, and people can confirm the value of their contribution.
Incorrect, the second chance is only happen for big user which has been trusted for long especially if you have a power e.g. DT1, gangs, earn merit regularly, have many positive feedback etc. If you're just an Average Joe who don't have anything, when you receive red tag, your career is over. Want to see the proof? you can open a new account and try to scam, then try to earn merit with that account. It might be hard to trust them when it comes to financial deals, but they can still make some good names even with those negative ratings by being productive in any way that they can, and people can confirm the value of their contribution.
Many merit sources or users don't like to meriting a negative tag account.
Second chance will be given if the sin committed by any forum member reputable or not is just minor. But if they commit scamming,extortion or any big sin done for sure nothing to retrieve back and we see also a lot of cases happening here. Reputation cannot do anything if a reputable person commit a large sin since for sure many will distrust them and put more tags then the community will discourage people to deal with them.
Also merit is just a number and this is just used to rank up so if people doesn't have plan to join on any campaigns since they are fine with current status since they are still earning good figures then they should be fine and don't worry about earning merit here.
If not, those trust ratings do not truly define the person. There is always a second chance given to everyone, and there is a benefit of doubt if the person, after receiving all those bad ratings, still continues to do some good in the community.
It might be hard to trust them when it comes to financial deals, but they can still make some good names even with those negative ratings by being productive in any way that they can, and people can confirm the value of their contribution.
Incorrect, the second chance is only happen for big user which has been trusted for long especially if you have a power e.g. DT1, gangs, earn merit regularly, have many positive feedback etc. If you're just an Average Joe who don't have anything, when you receive red tag, your career is over. Want to see the proof? you can open a new account and try to scam, then try to earn merit with that account. It might be hard to trust them when it comes to financial deals, but they can still make some good names even with those negative ratings by being productive in any way that they can, and people can confirm the value of their contribution.
Many merit sources or users don't like to meriting a negative tag account.
negative trust will not affect your account, and you will not be banned or banned from merits because of it, but it will increase the possibility of being excluded from signature campaigns. You need to have unique quality posts to convince the campaign manager to include you in the signature campaign, and some may not trust you or your posts.
Nope, amount of merit or trust feedback doesn't have to do anything with loosing your account. What will get you banned is breaking some of the forum rules (most common reason is plagiarism) and you can find the full list here
Aside from this, Op should note that, negative tags matters from who they come from and the reason they came. If you want to understand how trust system works, here is a post :LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust systemNegative tags gives reasons to members of the Forum, to be cautious with an account in the areas were the user did go against the rules of the forum while some of this tag may not matter or inappropriate, they affect campaign managers for considering those accounts in participating in such campaign but this depends on what was the reason for the tag
when you have 1000 merit whereas +0/=1/-4 this type a trust increases chances to loose the http://bitcointalk.org account?
You only lose your account when your account was hacked and you failed to recover it or similarly when you lost your account by yourself and can not recover it (without hack).Negative trust only affects your account if you want to make trades with other forum users or your chance to be accepted by campaign managers to join signature campaigns.
Learn about Trust / Feedback system.
LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system.
When an account automatically loses it's trust rating, it's better for OP to accept their fate than try to post and become a tyrant - cus that's definitely what they'll resolve at. Getting tagged for whatever reasons would mean losing your reputation; ain't noboy would dare trust you with their businesses, funds, opportunities ..whatsoever, including sig.camps. If there's anything else I wouldn't wanna soil, it'd be my reputation..TBH!
Losing your trust rating does not mean you should go under ghosts for no reason. There could be reasons why one can lose their trust rating or get tagged for some bad business deal, and all of that could lead to people distrusting you, which is normal, but that does not mean there is nothing good that can come out of such an account, unless the account owner is good at giving up or already has in mind to accept his faith.
If not, those trust ratings do not truly define the person. There is always a second chance given to everyone, and there is a benefit of doubt if the person, after receiving all those bad ratings, still continues to do some good in the community.
It might be hard to trust them when it comes to financial deals, but they can still make some good names even with those negative ratings by being productive in any way that they can, and people can confirm the value of their contribution.
When an account automatically loses it's trust rating, it's better for OP to accept their fate than try to post and become a tyrant - cus that's definitely what they'll resolve at. Getting tagged for whatever reasons would mean losing your reputation; ain't noboy would dare trust you with their businesses, funds, opportunities ..whatsoever, including sig.camps. If there's anything else I wouldn't wanna soil, it'd be my reputation..TBH!
Sandra 🧑🦰
I've seen lots of dude around nearby being upsets with that.!!!!
They're angry for obvious reasons; most of them owned slots on major campaigns and they had to be removed... it's even more stupid to be angry afterwards.Sandra 🧑🦰
Nope, amount of merit or trust feedback doesn't have to do anything with loosing your account. What will get you banned is breaking some of the forum rules (most common reason is plagiarism) and you can find the full list here
Is that true?
when you have 1000 merit whereas +0/=1/-4 this type a trust increases chances to loose the http://bitcointalk.org account?
I've seen lots of dude around nearby being upset with that !!!!
thanks,
Watching
when you have 1000 merit whereas +0/=1/-4 this type a trust increases chances to loose the http://bitcointalk.org account?
I've seen lots of dude around nearby being upset with that !!!!
thanks,
Watching
Jump to: