Topic: Ongoing Civil War in U.S.A. corporation - page 61. (Read 410358 times)

You just post and run and never comment. Come on King Tom I want to talk to you.

Why The Media Covers Up Bilderberg
http://www.infowars.com/why-the-media-covers-up-bilderberg/

OK Then King Tom is a tard  and my original comment stands.

Lol, I just quoted the OP https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1873731 , the posts from Iterwebs aren't mine haha

LOL King Tom. Now you are posting stuff from Dallas Gold Bug's http://wellaware1.com/ site. It is known to be 100% pure bullshit. I especially like 'Getty' Lee. BUAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

You just lost all truth points and have been reset to -50% on the 0-100 scale of the truth meter.

EDIT: Sorry King Tom I see that the post of stupid was from sana54210. Ignore my comments. sana54210 just stop using Interwebs. You need serious shelp.

Yes, you are correct, that was huge.
The predictions of "complete global financial meltdown", "World War III", etc. can hopefully be wrong for several more decades.

Known fact. I have a DVD interviewing first responders. The FBI threatened and in one instance killed a cop that was a first responder. Timothy McVeigh, while guilty, was a patsy. FYI Eric Holder was involved in this crime as well.

How OKC Bombing Was A False Flag To Blame Liberty Movement
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppxeZy5A6rM

Amateurs? You never watched. Doctors, all professionals in the field, presenting factual evidence. Fuck off. You are now on ignore for being an asshole.

So instead, you trust amateur websites and youtube videos, which are not peer-reviewed or even based on empirical evidence.

No the journals are corrupt because they do not allow real science to be published. Instead they ridicule, delay, and obfuscate.

Heh, you just went up a notch in my book for the George Carlin quote. 

But seriously though, you just shot yourself in the foot by saying that scientific journals are corrupt and entertain pseudoscience.

Because everything you claim has its basis in those journals. Even if you cherry-pick evidence and misinterpret results, they all came from journals. So if all the journals are corrupt, then we all might as well just make EVERYTHING up. It's totally illogical.

LOL You have Stockholm Syndrome. You are in love with your captors. That government article was 100% fabricated to discredit truth and protect big pharma, the largest political donors on the planet.

Scientific journals? Corrupt. They only entertain pseudo science. Next you will say AIDS came from Africa because of human-monkey sex, when it is a American Military Industrial Complex bioweapon.

I know the truth hurts but it beats living the American dream - because you have to be asleep to believe it. Thank you George.

Lol. Dude, you seem to be quite receptive to suggestion yourself, not to mention confirmation bias. Try reading some actual scientific publications/journals rather than the pseudoscience-based sites you normally get your information from. I'm not gonna even attempt to discuss these issues with you, you're too far gone.

Oh yeah, Andrew Wakefield, the guy who was disgraced by fellow doctors and had his 1998 paper retracted due to fraudulent actions. Did you know that he paid children for blood samples at his son's 10th birthday party? Does that seem like good, accurate scientific research to you?

Something big did happen in 2008. The biggest wealth transfer in recorded history.

There is all kinds of evidence pointing to industrial waste being used to lower the IQs of people who drink 'fluoridated' water. It is a soft-kill bio-weapon that makes obedient workers who are receptive to suggestion. Just one more part of the toxic soup that slow kills humanity by destroying their immune system and mind. Cancer, autoimmune disorders (which are really viruses injected into you from vaccines), autism are running rampant. This is the cause.

Vaccines are the worst bio-weapon ever created. They have never prevented a single illness since they supposedly cured the polio pandemic. Of course leading experts in the field have proven that myth to be bunk science that most of the public believes.

TPTB look at as a means to fill their pockets and consolidate power. They steal from us our entire lives while making us sick with their pharma poisons which eventually kill us. It is really good on their bottom line as they extract wealth along the entire life-cycle of the human.

Experts on vaccines:

Dr. Richard Tent:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuDvRSvyz5Y

Dr. Wakefield:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14I9cx3k0DI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7NotxTg7jg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2XKRanrz28
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7kbWfsygG4

Various Experts on fluoride:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3ARhMPVu-A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh-oeu2L8yM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpw5fGt4UvI

Give up the shilling. You will not win this debate.

What in the world are the elite up to?  In recent days, we have learned that the New York Fed is moving a lot of operations to Chicago because of concerns about what a “natural disaster” could do, the federal government is buying 62 million rounds of ammunition commonly used in AR-15 semi-automatic rifles for “training” purposes, and NORAD is moving back into Cheyenne Mountain because it is “EMP-hardened”.  In addition, government authorities have scheduled a whole host of unusual “training exercises” all over the nation.  So are the elite doing all of this in order to prepare for something really BIG, or should we just chalk up all of this strange activity to rampant government paranoia?
...


I remember so many similar articles since 2007, that I almost wish the "something big" would happen, so we can start to recover.

Actually you're jumping to some huge conclusions here, there's no evidence that it lowers IQ or pacifies. The Harvard meta-analysis which some people claim shows correlation was highly flawed. Another more recent and accurate study performed in Australia shows no correlation between lower IQ and fluoride intake. You may find this link interesting, it goes into how flawed the Harvard paper was.

Although the pineal gland does accumulate fluoride deposits over time, it also accumulates many other minerals such as calcium. And there's no evidence to show that this is unhealthy in moderation.

Your comment about industrial waste is misleading (although half true). Fluoridation plants use hydrofluorosilicic acid to treat water, which reacts in an aqueous solution (water) to produce fluorine ions (fluoride) and silica. It is industrial waste in the sense that it is collected from industry as a waste product. That doesn't make it bad, after all many processes produce pure water as industrial waste.

The only thing that excess fluoride causes is dental and skeletal fluoridation (and you need A LOT for that, far more than the level which is currently added to drinking water). There is no evidence for any loss of IQ or pacification.

Also there is far more fluoride in tea than in fluoridated drinking water, and we've been drinking tea for hundreds of years.

Jade Helm Is Training To Kill Americans Who Resist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXaYNtMIGUY