Topic: Ongoing Civil War in U.S.A. corporation - page 73. (Read 410309 times)
According to the 13 inbred European Bloodlines of the terrorist organization Illuminati. Generals in the U.S. military must be fired for their believes of Freedom in the USA. The goals to put the idea of FREEDOM to extinction in the USA has began.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-is-obama-purging-generals-from-the-military-792190
The topic was that you were questioning claims that I was making in this thread, and I was verifying them by posting proof.
So, that's the whole of your concern with world politics; that some actors might be involved in hoaxes? And yet you wonder why I didn't feel the need to continue the debate with you once I realised this.
The whole of my concern in this thread is to 1) back up the claims that I have made, 2) discredit your claims, 3) call out the people who are laughing or making jokes in this serious thread, and 4) to educate people on the existence of hoax actors used for political ends, in particular the "Big Three".
No need to debate when I have backed up every claim that you have questioned so far.
You may be able to elicit further claims from me, but I have already made plenty.
Also, this claim of yours is discredited for lack of proof:
Quote from: Page 29, Post 561 on bitcointa.lk: https://bitcointa.lk/threads/ongoing-civil-war-in-america.106965/
Because that's who's coming up with these ridiculous conspiracy theories - the government hopes that by publishing the weird, far out and bizarre conspiracies that no one will take the real conspiracies seriously. And you, my friend, are part of the problem, not the solution.
Hoax actors are a very real conspiracy, but this quote shows you are not taking any of this seriously. Where is your evidence? Which conspiracies are more real than 9/11, Boston, and Sandy Hook?? I would love to discuss your claim, if you don't mind...
Civil War
It's going to happen. It's not going to be good for any of us. We're all going to lose. And perhaps, when it's over, just perhaps, we can restore the dreams of a Republic.
It's going to happen. It's not going to be good for any of us. We're all going to lose. And perhaps, when it's over, just perhaps, we can restore the dreams of a Republic.
9/11 Families Forced To Pay To Memorialize Loved Ones
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHBpilwfEUo
320,000,000+ Americans now starting to realize that they are slaves. For the last 50+ years, it was all a trick to create an illusion of freedom in the USA.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5N0kNf2-kfI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHBpilwfEUo
320,000,000+ Americans now starting to realize that they are slaves. For the last 50+ years, it was all a trick to create an illusion of freedom in the USA.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5N0kNf2-kfI
Deep bruv
Illuminati shutting down small businesses all over the USA.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bevu7YU7jco
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bevu7YU7jco
*Puts on tinfoil hat*
Please, don't do that. You'll miss the full experience of the blinding weirdness.
*Puts on tinfoil hat*
Imagine you're back in school and you're on the debating team. What is the topic for which you are arguing? Is it just "actors are in staged events"?
Actors are involved in hoaxes, period. You finally agree with me?
Sorry, I didn't realise English is a second language for you. I should have been more clear. All I meant was: "What is the topic for which you are arguing?"
The topic was that you were questioning claims that I was making in this thread, and I was verifying them by posting proof.
So, that's the whole of your concern with world politics; that some actors might be involved in hoaxes? And yet you wonder why I didn't feel the need to continue the debate with you once I realised this.
why illuminati is here?
We are not. This guy is just trying to lump us in with some crazy evil assholes we have nothing to do, or in common, with.
My main point is to prove my claim beyond any reasonable doubt;
For example, (news footage/video that shows) the use of a dummy would prove my claim that actors are involved in staged events (hoaxes). Is this evidence not sufficient to prove my claim? Why not?
I fail to see where your confusion is coming from.
For example, (news footage/video that shows) the use of a dummy would prove my claim that actors are involved in staged events (hoaxes). Is this evidence not sufficient to prove my claim? Why not?
I fail to see where your confusion is coming from.
Imagine you're back in school and you're on the debating team. What is the topic for which you are arguing? Is it just "actors are in staged events"?
Actors are involved in hoaxes, period. You finally agree with me?
Sorry, I didn't realise English is a second language for you. I should have been more clear. All I meant was: "What is the topic for which you are arguing?"
The topic was that you were questioning claims that I was making in this thread, and I was verifying them by posting proof.
This proof is not sufficient because I have written this:
We have the merger of state and corporate power in this country (fascism); that is a fact and the proof has been given to you.
So what is your proof that this is an extraordinary claim? I have already proven my claim and you can reference the D&B site yourself if in doubt!
We were discussing the extraordinary claim of the apparent take over of the government by doppelganger actors. We have the merger of state and corporate power in this country (fascism); that is a fact and the proof has been given to you.
So what is your proof that this is an extraordinary claim? I have already proven my claim and you can reference the D&B site yourself if in doubt!
Not true.
I was waiting for you to quote one of my claims so that we discuss it, because I am not going to defend something I did not say.
Yes, you did:
Actors are involved in staged events (hoaxes)
Terrorism can involve simulated violence used for political ends;
the violence does not even have to be real;
these drills are being used for political ends;
most will fall for the hoax, so the effect is the same.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dp1yIxCX7tw
Above is a clip of a proven hoax used for political ends.
Remember, if the event is real, there is no need to fake anything.
the violence does not even have to be real;
these drills are being used for political ends;
most will fall for the hoax, so the effect is the same.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dp1yIxCX7tw
Above is a clip of a proven hoax used for political ends.
Remember, if the event is real, there is no need to fake anything.
Quarter of Americans want their state to secede from US
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lM0K_SiowaY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lM0K_SiowaY
My main point is to prove my claim beyond any reasonable doubt;
For example, (news footage/video that shows) the use of a dummy would prove my claim that actors are involved in staged events (hoaxes). Is this evidence not sufficient to prove my claim? Why not?
I fail to see where your confusion is coming from.
For example, (news footage/video that shows) the use of a dummy would prove my claim that actors are involved in staged events (hoaxes). Is this evidence not sufficient to prove my claim? Why not?
I fail to see where your confusion is coming from.
Imagine you're back in school and you're on the debating team. What is the topic for which you are arguing? Is it just "actors are in staged events"?
Actors are involved in hoaxes, period. You finally agree with me?
Sorry, I didn't realise English is a second language for you. I should have been more clear. All I meant was: "What is the topic for which you are arguing?"
Maybe it’s time for America to split up as it was meant to be in 19th century before the invasion of the South. There is no hope for the USA as it is becoming a puppet to the NWO and its banking cartels
Exclusive: Angry with Washington, 1 in 4 Americans open to secession
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/09/19/us-usa-secession-exclusive-idUSKBN0HE19U20140919
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/09/19/us-usa-secession-exclusive-idUSKBN0HE19U20140919
Police de-militarization bill hits Congress
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mQd8LV3sjc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mQd8LV3sjc
My main point is to prove my claim beyond any reasonable doubt;
For example, (news footage/video that shows) the use of a dummy would prove my claim that actors are involved in staged events (hoaxes). Is this evidence not sufficient to prove my claim? Why not?
I fail to see where your confusion is coming from.
For example, (news footage/video that shows) the use of a dummy would prove my claim that actors are involved in staged events (hoaxes). Is this evidence not sufficient to prove my claim? Why not?
I fail to see where your confusion is coming from.
Imagine you're back in school and you're on the debating team. What is the topic for which you are arguing? Is it just "actors are in staged events"?
Actors are involved in hoaxes, period. You finally agree with me?
Ever heard of FEMA's 600 concentration camps across the USA? http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/fema.htm 
America is anti-Israel because Israel was intentionally setup as a terrorist state by the British regime.
America is anti-Israel?
Do you have a respectable source for that?
We should be like the Swiss and not take sides in anything.
American Patriots Militia Groups launched a nationwide campaign to burn down trees surrounding the multi-million dollar homes own by the 13 inbred terrorist European Bloodlines to suffocate them out of America.
http://www.local12.com/news/features/top-stories/stories/hundreds-flee-two-california-fires-17611.shtml
http://www.local12.com/news/features/top-stories/stories/hundreds-flee-two-california-fires-17611.shtml
The black smoke from the burning flames foreshadow the deaths of the grandchildren & children of the 13 inbred terrorist European Bloodlines.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/15/california-wildfires/15685257/
Jump to: