Topic: Online or offline gambling which is more safer? - page 8. (Read 1662 times)

That is why you should always pick a reputed casino over some unnamed random casino. BC game has a good reputation in this forum even a year ago. But they have ruined all their reputation with their bullshit live support. I believe they never intended to scam their players, but due to bad management, they have ruined their reputation. There were scam accusations here and there. But, It seems they are fixing everything as of now.

Not only BC game, but every casinos asks for KYC verification once they see that a player won a certain amount of money. They do not require KYC prior sign up because of the obvious reason. If they can get some money from rules violators, this is not bad for their business. You have to understand this.  

Honestly, I don't really understand what you are saying, but what is certain is as I said before and there I have explained a little that both casinos, whether online or offline, have their risks and how serious the risks you will suffer really depends on How do you respond to the gambling activities that you do? If you always overdo it, then obviously the risk of losing will be greater, and also with slight differences in terms of service and convenience.

As for security issues, it depends on the casino you visit, if they are one of the new casinos then maybe I will be a little worried about the data I have involved there because usually their security level has not been tested and it is not uncommon for me to find several people who experience this. problems resulting in accusations of fraud. Gambling is nothing more than just a probability game activity that has absolutely no certainty whatsoever at the end of the session between winning and losing, if you want to win then you must also be prepared to lose, therefore it is always recommended to put an amount that we can afford to minimize the occurrence. emotions that can make you act out of control.

Well, convenience is different from security which is what we are talking about. Obviously, online gambling is more accessible given that internet connection is the only thing that will be needed in order to be able to play. Land based casinos, if it is legal in your country and if it is registered, would be safer in terms of security given that there is a slight to no chances of you being scammed by the casino provider unlike with online gambling sites wherein there are numerous instances of fraud. However if it is concerning safer environment for your health then it would be online platforms; in most casinos, players are also smokers and obviously you could be a victim of second hand smoking.

With gambling addiction, statistics say that online gambling makes more player exposed into it due to convenience and accessibility given that you won't be able to visit landbased casinos whenever you like. However it will still depend on what type of a gambler you are. If you are too greedy of winning, then you are for sure prone of gambling addiction regardless of the platform you are engaging.

If we do speak about the literal thing about being risky then it would really be pertaining about risk when it comes to gambling addiction on which you do really know that chances in speaking about getting those kind of conditions could really be high depending on a certain individual when it comes on dealing up with gambling. When it comes neither on online or offline then engagement
isnt bad as long you do really know on how to control or simply having that moderation. This is why it would be that best that having self control when it comes to dealing with gambling.
We do know that there are people who are not really that good when it comes to self control, there are ones who cant really be able to do so and this is why we do see different situations
when it comes to certain person since not all would really be that wise on making decisions.

Yes, maybe the OP only sees it from his point of view, even though if he looks at it from another point of view it will be different again because for offline and online gamblers there is not much difference, it's just that it comes back to each individual, maybe there have been offline gamblers who experienced defeat but he returned home then took the money and gambled again at the casino, so it cannot be said that online gamblers are much more at risk than offline gamblers.

Nothing is safe if the gambler continues to play irresponsibly because without controlling himself when gambling he can be carried away by emotions and feelings, thus making the gambler continue to gamble beyond the limit when he experiences defeat or victory without proper control, once again there is no which is safe in the world of gambling both offline and online and I'm sure you agree with that.

The subject might need a modification. When it comes to losing money, no safe between online and offline gambling.

We can change OP's subject to, which is more prone to losing more money between online and offline gambling. Since topping up an account in online gambling is just one tap away, we can assume that online gambling is more prone to losing money.

But I disagree with OP saying that offline gambling (or let's change the term into physical gambling), reduces the risk of overspending money in gambling. It's not true. These gamblers who enjoy gambling in physical casinos mostly have lots of money on hand. Even if they don't bring much, it's easy to just return to the gambling hall anytime.

Both options are equally risky if you're the type of person who can't control their gambling habit and continues to lose more money than they can afford. Even if you visit an offline casino, a compulsive gambler will always find a way to continue gambling, whether it's by bringing their debit or credit cards or carrying cash. Which is the same as playing online, everything can be reach by your hand and you can easily fund your online wallet to fund your gambling account. In such cases, there is no such thing as a safe option.

Yes, we think that's the Same thing too , of Course things vary According to the Tastes of the Person as such, because if it's a person who really likes being in a casino and seeing the Atmosphere and Everything there , then it's Something What is paid to her, if she is a Worker who likes to socialize, well, also, when it comes to making a Large Withdrawal of money , I don't know , but I think that it is just Dangerous , because if they give her the Cash , there can be many Factors through which since the person is in some kind of danger, I would like to find a way that is money or not give it to me in cash, but I don't know what other ways could happen, it would be Exceptional if they could Implement that they could Deposit it in usdt , bitcoin , or in any Medium of These , but if you have to repeat the gnacias the danger will lie in going out and leaving everything there and taking it with us because that represents a way of being in danger, because they may be Watching you from the canyon and be warning other People to rob you or something like that, that's the danger I see.

In an online casino things can be Different with Different ways of seeing it because you can have the money in one Place and be able to access it from a wallet or the person can make the return to an Exchange , wallet or wherever seems best to the Person , with respect to a possible hack, but maybe it is Possible , but we as users that we have and we Must have Security we must Adopt all the caps of the same, as the factor of 2fa that is for me even though many say that they do not like it In fact , it is necessary here in the forum to already implement it , because things with this tend to be Good , so in this order of days, we must make our security high at all times, and not Allow things to go wrong. of control with this, of course now things with the KYC and all this Complicates it , but even so I consider both Options to be Equally Safe.

Even though offline looks safer, I still choose online gambling. the reason is because I am used to this and it is very easy to play with no place. wherever I am I can gamble. If we gamble offline we have to come to a certain place. I think the issue of security is the same. unless they are a large casino that has been around for a long time, otherwise they are difficult to trust whether they are truly honest in their casino or there is fraud.

Let us not take this too far, huge amounts are being wagered daily in online casinos, and by the way, how many online casinos' customers have been fairly hacked? Hacking is possible but it would be majorly targeted at the person of the casino itself, and not their customers, and most times, it is often an internal job, not otherwise. Even those casinos that claim that their customer's account was hacked might not be entirely truthful about it, which is why we should be smart even when we gamble online. We might divide our money in casinos so that the ones we are playing with will not be greedy to the point of attacking us directly or indirectly to steal our money and blame it on anything else.

Online casinos have their good side which ranges from easy accessibility, privacy, low wagering, comfort and all that, which can't be substituted for anything. Besides, I have read of the cases of being robbed after winning big from an offline casino, but bro, this is something old, not new again. I do not know the person who will be so foolish enough these days to cash out his winnings in cash. What is peculiar to those who were robbed was cash withdrawals from their casinos which I know is not good.

Talking about safety, I think it's the same. They have their own cheats or loopholes in each game. but comparing the two, I believe more in offline gambling. Just like card gambling, it is immediately distributed in front of us, even if they have cheating, we who are experienced will definitely know it. If there is fraud online, it is very difficult for us to claim the fraud, especially since their data is hidden. but I don't have a problem with online or offline gambling. For me, gambling means that I have invested the money from the start, regardless of winning or losing.

But let's also face it, RTP doesn't exist in physical casinos. We can keep on playing for thousands of rounds but we won't still hit that moment where the casino is giving back. Online casinos do have that which makes them more attractive to most gamblers. If they can somehow prolong the game because of the RTP then I think there's a chance to win the game. A $1000 will go so far if you bet $1 per round or half of it. In Plinko, it might take 10000 rounds before it's all gone and so do with Keno. I think double or triple the rounds when it's slots, picking the games with enhanced RTP will make it go further than that.
That's what we cannot have in physical casinos because most of the time they just keep on taking our money until we are rekt. We are only looking for one lucky strike there but that could mean spending a lot of money if luck won't come.

but I think it depends on a person's use of money, if someone has financial arrangements for gambling I think they will be safer in financial matters in principle. But if you don't have that, it is definitely a difficult thing for a gambler, both offline and online gambling, they will definitely lose their money because they continue to be tempted by curiosity.

but in my opinion, whether a game or casino is safe depends on the casino itself, whether online or offline, because many offline ones are also not safe, so in my opinion this is relative.

If it is about using funds to gamble in online or offline casinos, it may be the same but it also depends on each person who gambles. Some people can control the use of funds for gambling at online casinos. They understand that excessive use of funds in gambling will only result in more losses and if they continue to do things like that, they will lose even more money than people who gamble in offline casinos, and vice versa. So we must be able to control our funds to gamble wherever we gamble, be it an online or offline casino, to avoid more losses.

It's possible that brick-and-mortar casinos already have a way that makes it easier for people to transfer their funds to a casino account so that the casino can just credit the funds to their gambling account. After that, gamblers at physical casinos can immediately gamble and won't have the hassle of carrying a lot of money to physical casinos. There may be an ATM machine service in a physical casino, making it easier for gamblers who come to the casino and want to gamble immediately after they withdraw their money from the ATM machine. There are many ways that physical casinos can do this, depending on the technology used by the physical casino.

Since online gambling is way more accessible and convenient, expect more users doing online gambling losing money in a process.

But don't forget the fact that either online or offline gambling, there's no such thing as being safe. Both can wrecked your wallet.

Generally speaking, we are talking about gambling here. A gambler will always find a way to gamble because of their temptation.

Its really that impossible that you cant really be able to differentiate in speaking about the risk in both places but eventually both things does have risks in speaking about on the gambling games
naturally but in speaking about security then it could also have that imposed those security risks too on which it would be that impossible that you would really be able to point it out
on the time that you would really be able to experience things on which it would really be just that too impossible that you wont really be able to notice it out
even just using your own common sense then you would really be able to spot it out. The thing here is that you should really just make use of the amount on which you can only afford to lose.

I think the safest choice is Online Gambling. The fact of the matter is that there's no real "safe" place. As even in the comfort of your own home you can find some stuff that would certainly put you in harm's way. But compared to getting outside and in one of the most aggressive and bustling parts of the outside world? Yeah your home's going to be a safe haven indeed.

People inebriated from the complementary drinks, as well as those who are already frustrated with their luck and losses are already a good reason for you to think that brick-and-mortar casinos are not the safest place out there. Not to mention the fact that suicide is a common occurrence in most casinos as a lot of people down in their lucks and already decided about their fates come into casinos to basically go out with a bang. It's also considerably biologically hazardous to be inside a casino, I mean come on, some addicts literally piss on themselves just so they don't leave a hotspot especially in slot machines. And I don't need to mention how all of these aren't in the comfort of your home. At least I hope so lol.

So yeah, Online Gambling's still perilous from all the hacks and scams as what many here have mentioned, but compared to offline casinos? yeah it's going to be the safest choice between the two any day.

It is quite clear that at first glance we can already see about the advantages and disadvantages of both casinos, I agree with your idea that online casinos can make it easier for gamblers to get involved with all the conveniences they offer, and what is more prominent is that online casinos have no boundaries as long as you have a cell phone connected to the internet, meaning as you said that wherever and whenever we can gamble if we have a certain amount of balance in the account to bet and this is one of the advantages that physical casinos do not have.

On the other hand if you ask which one is more risky I think for people who have common sense and can use it properly then they will say that both types of gambling have the same risk but maybe with different types of convenience and services, and you have said that for risk issues it really depends on each individual on how they approach their gambling activities, if they go overboard and without having any management especially on their finances then obviously the risk of losing is potentially greater.

Casino rely on advertisements as one of their marketing strategy. I believe that this advertisement can easily hit or persuade people to play online since I'm positive that the advertisement online has some link of the casino and a gambler can easily play with ease since it is accessible as long as he has a device. On the other hand, offline casinos focuses in making gamblers stay on their casinos more after the gambler entered their casino.

I think that online casino leans more in making a gambler enter their casino and offline casino leans more in making gambler stay inside of their casino for extended period of time.

At the end of the day, it will all depend on the gambler. If the gambler is irresponsible, no matter where he play either online or offline, he will spend more and more.

It is all about the control of the gambler.

I think both offline and online gambling go in the same direction if someone is addicted to gambling because they will always gamble no matter what, whether it is offline or online. When someone is addicted to gambling, they can spend all day in a casino shop and even go to any length to borrow money when they know they have no more to gamble again, despite it being offline. The same applies to online gambling. But when someone is not addicted to gambling, offline can be safer because they will not feel more comfortable wasting their money when some people may be looking at them, but online it may be more comfortable to keep gambling because nobody sees him, especially me when I am gambling online. I spend more money online than offline because nobody is seeing me, but offline because I don't want people to carry my matter as a topic. I only spend a little amount that will not catch the intention of people nowadays, and that is why I don't even play online again.