Topic: [OPEN] ★☆★ 777Coin Signature Campaign ★☆★ (Member-Hero Accepted) (New) - page 36. (Read 92269 times)

I just want to inform the manager that I am now leaving this campaign  thank you for having me here for many months .

As I checked your post history you may have been left inactive in the previous round because almost all of your posts are on the local board and you have never posted one in gambling discussion and the other is just one-liner. I'm just assuming it but I think it really is. Just PM the boss because he is the only one who knows.

Come on dude, the current open slot is for hero/legendary you didn't meet the requirement for it. Be a bit smarter and read carefully before you apply to any campaign, I'm pretty sure boss wouldn't accept you

My data in the table is correct. Thank.

Hi Bounty Manager, why had you set me "inactive" for 79 round? I don't understand...  

Spreadsheet for round 79 has been turned in to lightlord for payment.

Available spots. Tier D
Hero/Legendary - 1slot

Note: My DM is always open to any inquiries, complains, observations etc.

Remember,
BrainbossCares❣️

Accepted: 29-06-2020

Things are already pretty transparent in the campaign spreadsheet, what you did is just repeating the same info, nothing much.

It's upto the manager's decision to judge about the working of participants and there activity ratios, other participants wanking about it is just unacceptable.

Just pretending to be the wisdom vomiter everytime is not an good Idea for dump movie watchers like you. Mr. Language expert.

Hello Brainboss, I did not mean to upset you and I understood that the offends prior the announcement are invalid. I made the analysis for things to be more transparent also for the other participants thus they'll have an idea about those trying to cheat the rules.

About not counting my posts...if that's your decision I'll have to live with it, aren't I? Although this is disappointing, as I spent hours for those analysis which were supposed to help.

But no good deed goes unpunished, right?

In my opinion you should learn to listen to me as your manager. I remember telling you, non of this analysis are relevant as all offends before the announcement are invalid remember they weren't breaking the rules of the campaign per se but just outsmarting it which is something I'm trying to tackle from this week onwards. There are better things you can involve yourself in that'll be highly appreciated by me like if you can identify the alts cheating both campaign.

PS: Just so you know, post made in this thread and that of Bitvest won't be counted towards the post count of this week. Reduced the rate at which you congest both threads.

You are very welcome I believe the rules were made by Hhampuz's predecessor, which is Lutpin, but can't say for sure.

---

Following my analysis on Bitvest signature campaign's last 11 weeks, I decided to a similar analysis here as well, also for the last 11 weeks. It is visible that 777 Coin campaign has also several users trying to outsmart the rules by staying inactive in a week then barely meeting the minimum 15 posts requirement.

- in round 68, Alveus (Tier C) received a first inactivity warning; in round 69 he was still inactive, he received a second warning and, as a consequence, he was demoted to Tier D.
- in round 69, Best Dreams (Tier B), jademaxsuy and Rodeo02 (both from Tier C) received a first inactivity warning; in round 70 they had 27, 17 and respective 15 posts.
- in round 70, nakamura12 (Tier C), Sebas.tian and Alveus received a first inactivity warning; in round 71 Alveus received a second warning and was excluded from the campaign; the others had had 18 and respective 22 posts.
- in round 71, FIFA World and rdluffy (both from Tier B), Rodeo02 (Tier C), Jeremy and Jateng (both from Tier D) received a first inactivity warning; in round 72 Jeremy received a second warning and was excluded from the campaign; the others had 20, 17, 15 and respective 15 posts.
- in round 72, Best Dreams (again, Tier B), Ailurophile, BTCLiz and (again) Sebas.tian (all from Tier D) received a first inactivity warning; in round 73 Best Dreams was again inactive, received a second warning and got demoted to Tier C; BTCLiz left the campaign at her own will while the others received both a second warning and were excluded from the campaign.
- in round 73, FIFA Worldcup (again, Tier B), BlackFor3st and (again) Rodeo02 (both from Tier C) received a first inactivity warning; in round 74 FIFA Worldcup had 19 posts, while BlackFor3st and Rodeo02 were again inactive, but for some reason they received again a first warning instead of a second warning thus they were not demoted to Tier D as they should.
- in round 74, virasog (Tier B), BitSat19 and (again) Best Dreams (both from Tier C) received a first inactivity warning; excepting them, as mentioned above, BlackFor3st ad Rodeo02 (both from Tier C) received erroneously a first inactivity warning, although this should have been their second warning; as a curiosity, Umerldress (Tier B) appears with only 14 posts but without a warning; in round 75 Best Dreams and BlackFor3st received a second warning (which in BlackFor3st's case is actually the third) and got demoted to Tier C; the others had 17, 17 and respective 18 posts.
- in round 75, FIFA Worldcup (for the third time in 5 weeks, Tier B) and jademaxsuy (for the second time, Tier C), received a first inactivity warning; in round 76 they had 17 and respective 15 posts.
- in round 76, Umerldress and (for the second time) virasog (both from Tier B), Jateng (for the second time, Tier C), Best Dreams (for the third time received a first warning plus 2 second warnings), BlackFor3st (for the third time received a first warning from which one should be a second warning plus an additional second warning), TeQuiero and xxjumperxx (all four from Tier D) received a first inactivity warning; in round 77 Best Dreams and BlackFor3st received a second warning and were excluded after 6 respective 5 total warnings; Jateng received a second warning and got demoted to Tier D; TeQuiero also received a second warning and was excluded; the others had 18 and respective 19 posts.
- in round 77, FIFA Worldcup (for the fourth time in 7 weeks), (the second time) nakamura12 (both from Tier B) and (for the third time) jademaxsuy (Tier C) received a first warning; in round 78 jademaxsuy received a second warning and got demoted to Tier D; the others had 16 and respective 15 posts.
- in round 78, Umerldress (for the second time) and (for the third time in last 5 rounds) virasog (both from Tier B), Rodeo02 (for the fifth time receiving a first warning, but one should have been a second warning), mikhailr (both from Tier C) and (for the third time receiving a first warning plus a second warning) Jateng (Tier D) received a first inactivity warning.

Conclusions
- several users stay inactive in a round then barely meet the minimum requirement in the second round, similar to Bitvest campaign (FIFA Worldcup, Rodeo02, Jateng, jademaxsuy)
- Best Dreams and BlackFor3st had 6, respective 5 consecutive weeks of inactivity prior being dropped
- those which are mentioned here had the following number of posts (in order from round 68 to 78; those marked with "-" are out of the campaign):
        - FIFA Worldcup: 19, 17, 20, 0, 20, 0, 19, 0, 17, 0, 16
        - Jateng: -, -, 15, 0, 15, 15, 16, 15, 0, 0, 0
        - Umerldress: 50, 39, 42, 22, 22, 19, 14, 15, 0, 18, 0
        - jademaxsuy: 17, 0, 17, 17, 20, 15, 16, 0, 15, 0, 0
        - Rodeo02: 23, 0, 15, 0, 15, 0, 0, 18, 18, 18, 0
        - xxjumperxx: -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, 0, 19, 28,
        - mikhailr: -  34, 60, 60, 26, 60, 60, 37, 15, 24, 0
        - nakamura12: 21, 17, 0, 18, 45, 26, 24, 20, 15, 0, 15
        - rdluffy: 36, 32, 50, 0, 17, 20, 19, 23, 16, 18, 19
        - BitSat19: 23, 40, 38, 31, 17, 30, 0, 17, 17, 27, 35
        - Alveus: 0, 0, 0, 0, -, -, -, -, -, -, -
        - BTCLiz: 0, 16, 30, 30, 0, -, -, -, -, -, -
        - BlackFor3st: 60, 60, 30, 53, 15, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -
        - Best Dreams: 15, 0, 27, 17, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -
        - Sebas.tian: -, 0, 0, 22, 0, 0, -, -, -, -, -
        - Jeremy: 20, 19, 21, 0, 0, -, -, -, -, -, -
        - Ailurophile: 16, 16, 23, 15, 0, 0, -, -, -, -, -
        - TeQuiero: -, -, -, -, -, -, -, 0, 0, 0, -
- in my opinion, Brainboss should pay most attention to these users (which are still inside the campaign): FIFA Worldcup (by far, the most slippery), Rodeo02 and Jateng (which seem to be almost as slippery as FIFA Worldcup). Best Dreams and BlackFor3st were two other great cheaters, but fortunately they were excluded.

Thanks for the helped but I got everything covered and also noted I try as much as I can to follow the ruled made by the campaign owner or previous manager (I have no idea who it belongs to but looking at the rules I'm force to believe it isn't that of @Hhampuz). The rules isn't against accepting previous users who were inactivity for sometime as far they have become active again and have quite a decent post history.

All offenses before the announcement are invalid so no need going to dig into the past. I'll start my assessment from this week and you all are welcomed to help clean up both campaign in removing users that think are smart. Probably most offenders are alts but since I don't have the skills or tools to detect that, I'll let it be but the moment they're caught (like the previous time), they won't escape punishment including getting red ragged.

Lol, I think that either you did not understand what I meant or you did not bother to click on the link mentioned by me in my previous post.

Of course I wasn't talking about my posts I never received any warning for not meeting the minimum of 15 posts. I was talking about those which received such warnings and which in the week following the warnings they barely met the minimum of 15 posts, doing this repeatedly just to outsmart the campaign and keep their spots. If you'll read my analysis you'll see which members practice that in Bitvest campaign.

Relax, as long as you done nothing wrong, you're good to go

I saw your post counts history before, nothing that raises any red flag.

Please check my analysis on Bitvest signature campaign's last 11 weeks. I'm sure similar activities can be found also inside 777 Coin campaign. I'll try to do a similar analysis tomorrow, if I'll have the time.

The generic reply and necroposting happens frequently in most sig campaigns. It'd be a good idea to do some QC on the posts, having screening them for months already.

User: grindale
Position to Apply: Full Member
Posts Start: 1110
Address: bc1q0vjj59caemunzf47dz47hxvmm7z5qrxpx2syxl

Let me know if I am accepted. I will change the signature. Thank.

Username : iamsheikhadil
Position to apply : Member
Posts start : 1059 (including this one)
Address : 32njQy1fjzbGmva5QTswg7AS1hCUJb87i2

Will immediately wear signature if accepted , I'm sorry I had to leave the campaign because of some exams and work and now that they are postponed, I am able to be active here again.

Thank you for this clarification. Does this mean that new places will be opened for new members instead of less active people? I hope to join this team. I have made a previous request and I will continue to follow this campaign until I become part of the team.

Update: after some weeks of closed observation of the spreadsheet I have identified some individuals that unknowingly or intentionally try to outsmart the rules put in place to help combat inactivity in the campaign. They become inactive for the 1st week then get a warning (1st warning). Trying to act smart in retaining their spot, they try as much as they can to make the minimum number of post which is 15 and most of the posts are spams per se, that's meaningless replies or generic posts. I think it's high time I introduced some strict measure to ensure hardworking users in lower tiers aren't been denied the opportunity to rank up and recieve higher rewards that they deserve.

Starting from this week's assessment anyone that has been given a 1st warning and makes just the minimum number of post to keep themselves in the campaign will receive additional strict assessment (reviewing of the posts made for the week). Any of them who fails to make the cut will be demoted to a lower rank so others who're actually been active on the forum and not treating the forum like some platform they just have to make.posts for the sole purpose of been paid, will be giving an opportunity to rank up.

If you're found guilty by me and think you don't deserve to be donated you're free to open a thread for debate on the reputation boards. The additional strict assessment will be cover by the no spam rules.

Do have a lovely weekend ahead...

User: Mor254
Position to Apply: Member
Posts Start: 78
Address: 1B3NgekUv5xjs5bRKkQwrHvnJBa2aG6xwG