Two weeks with CryptopreneurBrainBoss and what we got?:
- he managed to fully fill the empty slots from tier D, which were empty for months. I'm not saying here that his standards are too low, while Hhampuz's were too high (not at all, since he already warned users for low quality topics or he even denied way more posts than Hhampuz for low quality); I'm just stating that he managed in 2 weeks to fill all the slots of this campaign which were empty for a long time;
- he already raised participants attention by not counting a big amount of posts, fact which didn't happen before, showing he is not strict, by very strict with quality; I myself had 9 denied posts in his 1st week, while I was aware only about 4 or 5, which were "bump" posts;
- he warned users for low quality posts, fact which also, AFAIK, didn't happen before;
- when he was in error he admitted and he solved the error (also my case);
- he ranked up in upper tiers or on their corresponding rank users which were waiting this for a long time (see nakamura's case);
- he answers; and he answers fast, but, most important - he answers PMs (at least mine).
Once again: I'm not comparing here the actual manager with the previous one! I'm sure Hhampuz did his best here and also I'm sure about his good intentions. Different managers, different approaches though. I'm stating just CryptopreneurBrainBoss took over from where Hhampuz left and tried to improve in all possible ways Hhampuz's great work.
Gg Hhampuz! Gg CryptopreneurBrainBoss!
In Hhampuz defense, i sent PMs before which were promptly replied to, i even changed my payment address multiple times, and had no issues whatsoever. Hhampuz also issued warnings in the google document, in the comments column (was to the right, next to payment), i guess this was a bit hidden for some people to see (might need scrolling).
Hhampuz was lately busy or unavailable, which might be the reason the former campaign manager wanted to quit in the first place, and in the transition no new applicants were being accepted. But a year ago this was moving perfectly, you can see for yourself in this thread, just look at the earlier pages and also look at the old google document. Slots were being filled and upper tiers could not be available if people from higher tiers didn't leave or failed twice in a row the 15 message requirement per week.
Someone here on this thread even mentioned my name at some point, but you have to consider that if ranking user level meant lower payment (because only a lower tier slot was available in the higher user rank category) then it was the correct decision not to move the user unless explicitly requested (some did, but i didn't).
A reason I decided to move campaigns was to release the full member tier b slot i was occupying here which made little sense with my current user rank, so i wanted to give a chance to the full members who had been waiting too.
In the end I also think both managers do a good job. No complaints.
