Topic: [Open] 🚀 Bitcasino.io 🚀 [Signature Campaign] 🚀 [.02 BTC/week] - page 23. (Read 39023 times)

Exactly, and the way it should be - you're getting your payment for one week, nothing more.
In the rules it was stated that manager can remove you from the campaign for whatever reason and threatening to give scam accusation for one small mistake which he was about to fix seems like a good reason. I think if you behaved more politely there could've been a chance for you to stay, but not sure here, maybe manager just didn't like your posts quality, it's seriously up to him.

I think you're the one that's really not getting it. Here's the offer which he said "Yes, amends" to. "everything made right" "continue as normal" very clear words that mean everything goes back to the way it should.

I excluded the photo simply because I don't want people to go through half of the page to read what they could've read earlier, I responded to the whole situation.

You're really not getting it, manager never agreed to have you for 7 more weeks, "amends" meant those 120$ for one week. And "you have 24 hours to respond" that's not the way you treat a campaign manager, that actually is a blackmail and who are you to lay down conditions?

Interesting you excluded the photo of him extorting me after he agreed to pay what he was then threatening to withhold. Also, what is interesting is your viewpoint that I'm not being scammed 7 weeks of campaign payment because he agreed to "make everything right" from his error which would certainly include reinstating me in the campaign. That's $840 in potential earnings scammed because here he is in pictures agreeing to what I stated.


Not only that, for some reason he thinks or is twisting me giving him 24 hours to correct the mistake of scamming me 7 posts before opening a scam accusation for those 7 posts, is me actually blackmailing him. Which I think is pretty evidently false. But what to know what IS blackmailing and extortion?

Dear WaffleMaster,
It seems fair that you deserve the payment for the first week. Most importantly so, because we all saw your name in the spreadsheet and 0.015 right next to it for some time. Surely, both you and jeremy might have overreacted a bit, but that is okay and it happens most of the time when people argue. After paying for the first week, however, this manager has the full right to kick out anyone from this campaign as stated (and I remember it being stated a while now) in the official rules. The overall length of campaign is 8 weeks, but nobody promised anyone to be accepted for the whole period. This rule is reasonable, because it motivates campaign members to improve their posts when they are in the campaign, not just do their best before applying. Just take a look at history of FortuneJack signature campaign. It is paying huge sums weekly, but members are kicked out on regular basis with no explanation when better ones appear. There is no such thing as an obligation of manager to keep a member in the campaign throughout all its duration. Honestly, you act as if you never participated in signature campaigns before and never saw how things go there.
Please stop spreading fud about jeremy and companies he works for.
And dear jeremypwr, I understand that you had more urgent unexpected matters to deal with, but could you please say when the payments will be proceeded today? Thanks.

Thank you; since he just doesn't get that I was HELPING him get his payment in the first place.

The problem is that this guy thinks he's entitled to 8 weeks of me paying him, which is so far from the truth.

I can kick people out (as I routinely do) based on post quality, or if someone else comes along that is more qualified.

As I mentioned, he was dropped for (among other reasons) because I selected a Legendary member (better quality poster) to take his spot.

Clearly, he's upset and has resorted to these drastic matters.

Truth be told, he was the last person to submit a new BTC address and I was gonna boot him after he did regardless!

Ok, I took deeper look. They can't really change terms of this deal because it is not stated that they can change them http://archive.is/ZflfZ [1]

This is stated in rules:
[1]

A further 7 weeks, which he agreed to. 7 weeks = $840. Proof is in the pictures.

Sorry guys, but I will be forced to cancel the remainder of my Campaigns if this immature poster doesn't knock it off.

I hate to take money out of your pockets, but this person is not doing anyone any favors with his behavior.

Sorry guys, but I will be forced to cancel the remainder of my Campaigns if this immature poster doesn't knock it off.

I hate to take money out of your pockets, but this person is not doing anyone any favors with his behavior.

Since you agreed to let me back in the campaign, why shouldn't you be obligated to hold up to that arrangement which was also included in me deleting the posts? You literally just check mated yourself admitting that you're scamming me for $840 in 7 weeks potential payments (If I follow the rules) because you agreed to make everything right, which includes payment and putting me back in cus I was taken out in error. You are fully in the wrong, and you even just admitted it further.

 

He literally just used logic that applied to both parties to try and discredit what I am owed but not what his duties are in the agreement.

That's just ridiculous. From what I've read it looked like campaign manager was trying to WARN you and not BLACKMAIL. You've made a fuss, what do you think campaign manager would look like, if he paid you after all those posts you've made within a short period of time? You should've thanked him that he was worried about getting you your payment in the first place. Needless to say on BTT in campaigns with high payment managers are strict and it's a normal situation when you make a qualifying number of posts and still not getting paid because manager can consider some of them as nonconstructive. But it's not even that kind of situation now, you were about to get paid!
$960 - where did you get that number anyway? Why are you so confident you would've stayed in this campaign for any longer than 1 or 2 weeks? Any of the participants can be kicked out of the campaign. So what now, each participant should open a scam accusation for not getting potential payment?

Since you agreed to let me back in the campaign, why shouldn't you be obligated to hold up to that arrangement which was also included in me deleting the posts? You literally just check mated yourself admitting that you're scamming me for $840 in 7 weeks potential payments (If I follow the rules) because you agreed to make everything right, which includes payment and putting me back in cus I was taken out in error. You are fully in the wrong, and you even just admitted it further.

 

He literally just used logic that applied to both parties to try and discredit what I am owed but not what his duties are in the agreement.

That's just ridiculous. From what I've read it looked like campaign manager was trying to WARN you and not BLACKMAIL. You've made a fuss, what do you think campaign manager would look like, if he paid you after all those posts you've made within a short period of time? You should've thanked him that he was worried about getting you your payment in the first place. Needless to say on BTT in campaigns with high payment managers are strict and it's a normal situation when you make a qualifying number of posts and still not getting paid because manager can consider some of them as nonconstructive. But it's not even that kind of situation now, you were about to get paid!
$960 - where did you get that number anyway? Why are you so confident you would've stayed in this campaign for any longer than 1 or 2 weeks? Any of the participants can be kicked out of the campaign. So what now, each participant should open a scam accusation for not getting potential payment?

Remind me, how is that 960$

You were only one week in campaign, 1 week = 120$.

When I acknowledged my mistake, I agreed to pay him after he deleted all the FUD. So he deleted it, and rightfully so.