Pages:
Author

Topic: [OPEN] Blackjack.fun Signature Campaign | Up to $130/wk | ~$400k Monthly Contest - page 2. (Read 22581 times)

hero member
Activity: 2954
Merit: 672
Message @Hhampuz if you are looking for a CM!
I've been in this campaign for a while, was one of the members that were removed when they reduce participants and were able to come back when they start adding new participants, so the decision of the management is not new to me, and I'm willing to accept whatever the decision is. 

I like working with you guys, so I hope that the management will not push their decision to reduce the number of participants, stick with the same group, and just reduce the post requirement per week, that way sujonali1819 will not have a hard time choosing the members that will remain in the campaign.  Smiley 
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1139
I have completed faith in the managers decision, he has  thus far managed the campaign so well and would do the most for the campaign still. Which ever way it turns, the campaign comes first.

Good luck everyone!
jr. member
Activity: 66
Merit: 2
Hey Guys!
There is a big changes could be happen tomorrow. Team said to me to minimise the campaign for a while. So I have to make the big changes in this campaign. So I have decided make this campaign for maximum 10 participants. Now please help me, how I should process this changes? Don't take any decision personally. You are all good to me.

I will update the spreadsheet tomorrow and will remove some participants to short the campaign for 10 users.

Hopefully campaign will be back to normal in near future. Thank you.

Has the management already evaluated other solutions, likewise... reduce the amount paid per post or the total number of posts paid?

generally speaking @OP this is a difficult choice to make because there are several factors to keep in mind.

from my personal point of view... quality in the forum is "measured" by merits and it's the only "valuable" fact to be keep in mind.
users who write quality posts are "rewarded" in this way and in general this type of evaluation is used to understand "who spams" or creates "valuable contents".

I would use this criteria (example merit in the last 120 days/full history of merits) to understand who creates content of a certain level = more people read its contents = more visibility to the signature....

Only true if the merits that you get is from the gambling thread and not on other thread that is not related on gambling because this campaign is a Casino and you know how hard to get merit on gambling board.

it was 3 years since you wrote a message on the forum!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/xiestar-720626
I think there are more interesting topics to discuss after 3 years of absence, since they do not concern you directly... don't you think? Roll Eyes

I know that is really hard produce quality content not only in the "gambling" section but in the whole forum!  Wink

Not positng doesn't mean I'm not updated. I'm an ETH holder since 2016. Roll Eyes

You can start counting all your merits from gambling board to disproves my opinion. Since you join on this campaign how much merit you get on gambling board?

legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 4282
eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.
Hey Guys!
So I have decided make this campaign for maximum 10 participants. Now please help me, how I should process this changes? Don't take any decision personally. You are all good to me.

Don't reduced the pay as you could lose some high quality members that other high playing campaign will be willing to accept if open slots are announced or new campaign are launched so instead stick to your initial decision of reducing the participants. Times like this are hard for CM as any decision you make in your selection could be misinterpreted but I believe you'll do what's best for the company and not let your emotions get the best of you.

I'll be withdrawing my participation in the campaign not because I was offered any slot in other ongoing campaign but just to reduced the work load of you chosing participants to keep. If the campaign wants to increase slots in the future and I'm not occupied I'll apply but for now there are other qualified members and I think I'm among the newly accepted participants so other should have an edge to continue the advertisement. Goodluck to all participants and thanks for the opportunity to work with you sujonali.
hero member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 598
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Seeing this information now, I am able to recieve the notification because I have worked with Suj in this campaign.

Reducing the pay to $60 even if it works will not be a good thing to the campaign. Though it might go well with the participants. This is because if the pay is reduced to $60, this campaign will stop being a high pay campaign like Best_Change, KB8, Livecasino.io, FortuneJack and others. The result will be participants leaving and joining the campaign weekly, which was obviously how the campaign was before the big change was announced.
The best decision would be to downside the participants and hopefully everything will bounce back and the decision would be reverted to favour everyone.

Good point. I think this is key and has been missed in the ongoing discussion.

I'm on what the majority and the administrator will decide it's just an option meant to keep those who wants to stay I will respect the management decision, especially Sujon's decision I hope there will be more campaigns coming these weeks so we can still have additional income on this hard times.
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 3537
Nec Recisa Recedit
Hey Guys!
There is a big changes could be happen tomorrow. Team said to me to minimise the campaign for a while. So I have to make the big changes in this campaign. So I have decided make this campaign for maximum 10 participants. Now please help me, how I should process this changes? Don't take any decision personally. You are all good to me.

I will update the spreadsheet tomorrow and will remove some participants to short the campaign for 10 users.

Hopefully campaign will be back to normal in near future. Thank you.

Has the management already evaluated other solutions, likewise... reduce the amount paid per post or the total number of posts paid?

generally speaking @OP this is a difficult choice to make because there are several factors to keep in mind.

from my personal point of view... quality in the forum is "measured" by merits and it's the only "valuable" fact to be keep in mind.
users who write quality posts are "rewarded" in this way and in general this type of evaluation is used to understand "who spams" or creates "valuable contents".

I would use this criteria (example merit in the last 120 days/full history of merits) to understand who creates content of a certain level = more people read its contents = more visibility to the signature....

Only true if the merits that you get is from the gambling thread and not on other thread that is not related on gambling because this campaign is a Casino and you know how hard to get merit on gambling board.

it was 3 years since you wrote a message on the forum!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/xiestar-720626
I think there are more interesting topics to discuss after 3 years of absence, since they do not concern you directly... don't you think? Roll Eyes

I know that is really hard produce quality content not only in the "gambling" section but in the whole forum!  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
Seeing this information now, I am able to recieve the notification because I have worked with Suj in this campaign.

Reducing the pay to $60 even if it works will not be a good thing to the campaign. Though it might go well with the participants. This is because if the pay is reduced to $60, this campaign will stop being a high pay campaign like Best_Change, KB8, Livecasino.io, FortuneJack and others. The result will be participants leaving and joining the campaign weekly, which was obviously how the campaign was before the big change was announced.
The best decision would be to downside the participants and hopefully everything will bounce back and the decision would be reverted to favour everyone.

Good point. I think this is key and has been missed in the ongoing discussion.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1914
Shuffle.com
There is a big changes could be happen tomorrow. Team said to me to minimise the campaign for a while. So I have to make the big changes in this campaign. So I have decided make this campaign for maximum 10 participants. Now please help me, how I should process this changes? Don't take any decision personally. You are all good to me.
When it comes to picking the participants, it's probably best to have some form of criteria.

No matter what the results are in the upcoming change, surely all of us will understand it as you've been a great manager to us with all the updates and stuff.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1079
Goodnight, o_e_l_e_o 🌹
Whatever decision sujonali1819 will render I will respect it, but I would like to suggest just cutting the payout to $60 and so they can retain all of us,

Rethink your calculation, my friend. If there are 29 participants that can get paid a maximum of $100, that makes $2900 per week. If sujonali1819 is thinking of reducing to 10 participants, he has been given a weekly budget of approximately $1000. 29 participants multiplied by $60 is $1,740. Therefore, not everyone will be able to stay in the campaign if the payout is cut to $60 per participant.
Seeing this information now, I am able to recieve the notification because I have worked with Suj in this campaign.

Reducing the pay to $60 even if it works will not be a good thing to the campaign. Though it might go well with the participants. This is because if the pay is reduced to $60, this campaign will stop being a high pay campaign like Best_Change, KB8, Livecasino.io, FortuneJack and others. The result will be participants leaving and joining the campaign weekly, which was obviously how the campaign was before the big change was announced.
The best decision would be to downside the participants and hopefully everything will bounce back and the decision would be reverted to favour everyone.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
Whatever decision sujonali1819 will render I will respect it, but I would like to suggest just cutting the payout to $60 and so they can retain all of us,

Rethink your calculation, my friend. If there are 29 participants that can get paid a maximum of $100, that makes $2900 per week. If sujonali1819 is thinking of reducing to 10 participants, he has been given a weekly budget of approximately $1000. 29 participants multiplied by $60 is $1,740. Therefore, not everyone will be able to stay in the campaign if the payout is cut to $60 per participant.
jr. member
Activity: 66
Merit: 2
Hey Guys!
There is a big changes could be happen tomorrow. Team said to me to minimise the campaign for a while. So I have to make the big changes in this campaign. So I have decided make this campaign for maximum 10 participants. Now please help me, how I should process this changes? Don't take any decision personally. You are all good to me.

I will update the spreadsheet tomorrow and will remove some participants to short the campaign for 10 users.

Hopefully campaign will be back to normal in near future. Thank you.

Has the management already evaluated other solutions, likewise... reduce the amount paid per post or the total number of posts paid?

generally speaking @OP this is a difficult choice to make because there are several factors to keep in mind.

from my personal point of view... quality in the forum is "measured" by merits and it's the only "valuable" fact to be keep in mind.
users who write quality posts are "rewarded" in this way and in general this type of evaluation is used to understand "who spams" or creates "valuable contents".

I would use this criteria (example merit in the last 120 days/full history of merits) to understand who creates content of a certain level = more people read its contents = more visibility to the signature....

Only true if the merits that you get is from the gambling thread and not on other thread that is not related on gambling because this campaign is a Casino and you know how hard to get merit on gambling board.
full member
Activity: 2324
Merit: 175
Hey Guys!
There is a big changes could be happen tomorrow. Team said to me to minimise the campaign for a while. So I have to make the big changes in this campaign. So I have decided make this campaign for maximum 10 participants. Now please help me, how I should process this changes? Don't take any decision personally. You are all good to me.


This post is so sujonali he really cares for the participants and understands the side of participants, whatever decision sujonali will give the participants should respect because it is fair and nothing personal, it's hard to be a bounty manager and this is one side that makes it hard picking among the best who should be retained.
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1083
Whatever the decision, I will respect it. You already received several good options and I agree with all of those.

I believed you as an experienced campaign manager will think of the best way how to address the current issue.

That will test your decisive skills. Go give your best shot, sujon. Smiley
hero member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 598
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Whatever decision sujonali1819 will render I will respect it, but I would like to suggest just cutting the payout to $60 and so they can retain all of us, I believe the team is good and quality posters, you cannot get in the sujonali1819 campaign if you are not a good poster.

For me, it's a win-win situation I don't know about my teammates but honestly, I want to stay in a campaign where I am more comfortable until the admin decides to end the campaign I'm sure all of us feel the same way, I hope the admin decision is not final and he will reconsider but this is just a suggestion subject to our team's support.

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1563
From all the management I've been through in the past, the most common approach is to reduce the number of participants while keeping or changing the number of paid posts with the same pay rate, just like @Poker Player said.

On the other hand, the parameters for reducing the participant would, of course, depends on the:

- needed boards that participants post more often to optimally expose blackjack.fun to their target market which of course, gambling boards.
- participants that do not engage in nonsensical, repetitive, and with no other angle for discussion type of threads
- your own definition of a quality poster
- their earned merit

But hey, it's just me! And definitely, no hard feelings to whatever your decision might be.
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 3537
Nec Recisa Recedit
Hey Guys!
There is a big changes could be happen tomorrow. Team said to me to minimise the campaign for a while. So I have to make the big changes in this campaign. So I have decided make this campaign for maximum 10 participants. Now please help me, how I should process this changes? Don't take any decision personally. You are all good to me.

I will update the spreadsheet tomorrow and will remove some participants to short the campaign for 10 users.

Hopefully campaign will be back to normal in near future. Thank you.

Has the management already evaluated other solutions, likewise... reduce the amount paid per post or the total number of posts paid?

generally speaking @OP this is a difficult choice to make because there are several factors to keep in mind.

from my personal point of view... quality in the forum is "measured" by merits and it's the only "valuable" fact to be keep in mind.
users who write quality posts are "rewarded" in this way and in general this type of evaluation is used to understand "who spams" or creates "valuable contents".

I would use this criteria (example merit in the last 120 days/full history of merits) to understand who creates content of a certain level = more people read its contents = more visibility to the signature....
hero member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 657
No dream is too big and no dreamer is too small
I believe all of the members that are selected for the campaign are doing a great job, so I suggest that instead of reducing the number of participants, why not just reduce the number of posts to 15 posts per week. More members would give more unique ideas which would help the signature spread in different sections of the forum. In the end, the interest of the business here is an advertisement, isn't it good for the business that the community will see a big number of members wearing Blackjack.fun Signature?

I hope the owner and our dear manager would consider my suggestion as I'm sure all the members of the campaign will understand if they'll receive less as long as we are still intact and we can continue promoting Blackjack.fun.
hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 534
This is going to be hard decision to select most capable participants.

For you to balance equation and maintain your participants, i suggest that you should reduce the payment rate of the participants from hundred dollars payment to seventy dollar and check if the funds given by blackjack can serve to maintain all the participants.

Because using the budget of ten participants from the previous budget, if it's reduced to seventy dollar for participants it will add more participants and any participants that does not like the payment rate can change campaign. The selection of the most good posters will be tough because many of the blackjack participants post reasonably. Check their profile one by one
hero member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 453
Now please help me, how I should process this changes? Don't take any decision personally. You are all good to me.
All the participant on this campaign is good but as the project owner want to keep 10 participants only you should try to take best 10 participants though that is too difficult for you. But you have to do that and the decision of you is final who will remain on the campaign and who will not.

Indeed, This is the second time I've seen active campaigns today that reduce participants and also reduce the allocation budget, it's a rather difficult decision on the part of the Bounty managers. Good luck to the selected 10 participants.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
Hey Guys!
There is a big changes could be happen tomorrow. Team said to me to minimise the campaign for a while. So I have to make the big changes in this campaign. So I have decided make this campaign for maximum 10 participants. Now please help me, how I should process this changes? Don't take any decision personally. You are all good to me.

I will update the spreadsheet tomorrow and will remove some participants to short the campaign for 10 users.

Hopefully campaign will be back to normal in near future. Thank you.


Hello sujonali1819 and former blackjack.fun signature campaing colleagues.

It's sad to hear that. I suppose this is due to the bear market.

In the campaign I am currently in they have also reduced the budget.

The most logical thing would be to keep the best posters, sujonali1819, taking into account the quality, merit earned being one indicator but not the only one.

You also say that you have decided that there will be 10.

Let me tell you: in our case there were 40 of us in the campaign and the budget was reduced to 25% of the initial one. So the manager thought initially about reducing to 10 participants only, but in the end he thought it was better to stay with 15 participants and reduce the number of paid posts.

In your case you don't have much room but maybe you could reduce the number of paid posts to 20 and keep some more participants.



Pages:
Jump to: