The Question was...
Please educate me more...
Isnt taking a fee from scammer to use TOR/VPN to do their deeds here a direct cooperation to the said scam...
Your answer were...
If you access BCT through TOR, you will probably get the same message. It doesn't mean you're a scammer, it means the IP of the exit point you are accessing the forum through has been flagged for previous dodgy behaviour. Should all users be banned from using BCT if they unfortunately come from the same IP address as a scammer?
Besides, the point is still moot as highlighting the untrustworthy behaviour of others does not assuage your own. This argument point is thus rendered invalid.
Prove that everybody who exits a TOR/VPN point at a previously marked IP is a scammer then I'll answer whether taking money from users who opt to pay the fee in order to use this forum under those conditions is tantamount to collaborating with scammers.
You clearly believe yourself to be significantly smarter than your words are proving you to be. Please, go and read this book and, once you understand about critical thinking and objective argument, report back and acknowledge that, so far in this discussion, you have displayed none.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straight_and_Crooked_ThinkingNo, you are not basing your question on a fact, you are basing it on an unsupported assumption and demanding that it be treated as proven fact.
How about you actually offer up some fucking evidence for your baseless assumption? You claim that ALL people who encounter the message that their IP has been flagged as previously being involved in wrongdoing are also scammers, yes? Prove it.
(Hint: You know how I *know* your claim is utter bullshit? Cos I've paid that fee before when circumstances caused me to have to ask a discrete question through a TOR connection without anybody knowing who I was and I know I wasn't scamming anyone. So, you know fuck you and your stupid assumptions)
Repeating the same bullshit assumption over and over doesn't make it any less of the bullshit assumption it is.
I've logically explained why your bullshit assumption is false, now you have to try and prove why it is not. You will fail.
Yeah, we know.
Trouble is, even in the face of proof that your assumption is not proven fact, you keep repeating it as though it were.
You *really* suck at this.
You *do* know, right, that some people access this forum from oppressive regimes where a direct link is blocked? So they have to use TOR.
You *do* know this, right?
Please tell me you aren't so fucking moronic as you are repeatedly proving yourself to be.
Now please educate me...
Which one of your answer stated above answer the question?..
Your are clearly denying the fact here to save yourself by blindly and accepting the fact...
Now please can you educate me...