Open wallet with 0.09252 BTC ? | Bitcointalksearch.org

odolvlobo

legendary

Activity: 4466

Merit: 3391

You better don't use this address anymore

Just tried import that private key & my desktop wallet suddenly stopped working Sad

Don't try to import that private key on slow devices if you don't want your devices stopped working, also there are too many unconfirmed transaction.

The address has thousands of transactions and inputs that your SPV client needs to download and process. It takes a long time for some clients.

achow101

staff

Activity: 3458

Merit: 6793

Just writing some code

Quote from: ?? on ??

You better don't use this address anymore

Just tried import that private key & my desktop wallet suddenly stopped working Sad

Don't try to import that private key on slow devices if you don't want your devices stopped working, also there are too many unconfirmed transaction.

I managed to import it and another address into my wallet and it didn't crash. When I try to send a transaction with all of it though, my wallet says that the minimum fee is 2.24853362 BTC, way more than the amount of BTC in the addresses (0.25...)

shorena

copper member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1528

No I dont escrow anymore.

Quote from: Kiritsugu on July 09, 2015, 02:35:30 PM

Holy wtf. I just checked up on the addy's for the PKs I know, and not only have the balances been drained, but there are HUNDREDS of txs happening that claim they are 0btc txs, and the address they were sent to can't be decoded?

Wtf???

Someone is spending the inputs as fees, essentially donating the spam to the miners that remove it from the UTXO set.

Kiritsugu

legendary

Activity: 1570

Merit: 1041

Holy wtf. I just checked up on the addy's for the PKs I know, and not only have the balances been drained, but there are HUNDREDS of txs happening that claim they are 0btc txs, and the address they were sent to can't be decoded?

Wtf???

bitpump

full member

Activity: 167

Merit: 101

Quote from: Kiritsugu on July 09, 2015, 08:15:47 AM

We're not 'messing' with anyone, we're trying to figure out what's going on. It's also not the only address. I have ~7 more I found that are all similar.

Exactly. Thank you!

bitpump

full member

Activity: 167

Merit: 101

Quote from: Herbert2020 on July 09, 2015, 02:33:57 AM

i don't know if OP did this intentionally but
i have seen these kinds of post for two days now.
they are spreading the private keys to the addresses that are in the attack to the network and hoping other people will contribute to the attack by trying to spend the coins.
please remove the private key from your post.

"i don't know if OP did this intentionally but" -> NO, I just tried to crack a brainwallet. Thanks for the feedback !!

bitpump

full member

Activity: 167

Merit: 101

Quote from: albert11 on July 09, 2015, 12:40:41 AM

I'm confused...the private key matches with public key so how come there is still money in this wallet and why make it public instead of taking the funds?

hi, when I noticed, I did try to take the funds and did not succeed

now it says:
"Warning! this bitcoin address contains transactions which may be double spends. You should be extremely careful when trusting any transactions to or from this address."

this message was NOT present when posting this message

bitpump

full member

Activity: 167

Merit: 101

balance now seems almost $30

bitpump

full member

Activity: 167

Merit: 101

Quote from: aakashsangwan on July 09, 2015, 12:02:14 AM

So what is your motto behind the post???

BTW how did you find an open wallet with its private key???

how I found: after reading: http://www.wired.com/2015/07/brainflayer-password-cracker-steals-bitcoins-brain/
I tried to crack a brain wallet by using password = "password"

motto: motivation behind post is that I know that a lot of people are continiously trying to crack brainwallets,
so why was this wallet not taken yet .. ?!

lorylore

legendary

Activity: 1470

Merit: 1002

I cant see anything at the moment: Maximum concurrent requests for this endpoint reached. Please try again shortly.

ThEmporium

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

By looking at the Blockchain.info, it shows that it has finished 8 confirmations, so dude what's going on and why we are discussing here about the finished transactions and you have wasted our valuable time.

scox

full member

Activity: 147

Merit: 100

Quote from: BTCBinary on July 09, 2015, 07:08:25 AM

Is this happening because the Network is going Nuts! Huh

Kiritsugu

legendary

Activity: 1570

Merit: 1041

Quote from: Pursuer on July 09, 2015, 08:02:26 AM

what the hell!!
why are you sharing this here. is this one the addresses that was associated with the stress test.
you guys are messing with a lot of users now.

We're not 'messing' with anyone, we're trying to figure out what's going on. It's also not the only address. I have ~7 more I found that are all similar.

Pursuer

legendary

Activity: 1638

Merit: 1163

Where is my ring of blades...

what the hell!!
why are you sharing this here. is this one the addresses that was associated with the stress test.
you guys are messing with a lot of users now.

Blawpaw

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1027

Wow... Thats crazy weird. How come is this possible? Does anybody knows what's happening? is there a rational explanation for this?
Wouldn't it have something to do with the double spending Bug?

BTCBinary

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Is this happening because the Network is going Nuts! Huh

Kiritsugu

legendary

Activity: 1570

Merit: 1041

Quote from: gogxmagog on July 09, 2015, 03:42:54 AM

Why are they doing that though? If intentional, what would be the motive? Just to disrupt or are they trying to force some argument around the block limit? Or are they just trying to exploit the stresses? I don't get it. I've been seeing same type posts as well, and all the conversation around it is confusing.

whats going on?

Interestingly enough, I've found about 8 of these Private Keys similarly to what OP said. Most of them have .1btc+ as balance with shittons of inputs making the btc impossible to spend. Wtf is going on?

gogxmagog

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1010

Ad maiora!

Why are they doing that though? If intentional, what would be the motive? Just to disrupt or are they trying to force some argument around the block limit? Or are they just trying to exploit the stresses? I don't get it. I've been seeing same type posts as well, and all the conversation around it is confusing.

whats going on?

Herbert2020

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1137

Quote from: aakashsangwan on July 09, 2015, 12:02:14 AM

So what is your motto behind the post???

BTW how did you find an open wallet with its private key???

i don't know if OP did this intentionally but
i have seen these kinds of post for two days now.
they are spreading the private keys to the addresses that are in the attack to the network and hoping other people will contribute to the attack by trying to spend the coins.

please remove the private key from your post.

trace666

member

Activity: 92

Merit: 10

Quote from: albert11 on July 09, 2015, 02:13:57 AM

Quote from: odolvlobo on July 09, 2015, 01:58:23 AM

Quote from: bitpump on July 08, 2015, 11:47:07 PM

Open wallet found with 0.09252 BTC ?
https://blockchain.info/address/16ga2uqnF1NqpAuQeeg7sTCAdtDUwDyJav
private key: 5JXvHQfGHxUffo8BLRG1RBecRCZ2Jygtx5cNSiZoyk5Zcmhsdso
when you try to move the BTC, here is error message Wink

Insufficient Funds
This transaction cannot be sent because there are insufficent funds available. This may be due to additional miners fees or unconfirmed transactions.
The transaction can either be cancelled. Or the amount to send can be adjusted to match the maximum amount available to send.

The bitcoins can't be sent because the cost of sending them is more than their value.

There is more than 0.1 BTC in the wallet, it doesn't cost more than that to send them right?

If you look at transaction history you can see that some coins were spent at some point

Total Received 0.24753891 BTC

Final Balance 0.11123 BTC

or what you are saying is that at least 1 transactions in this BTC address should have been more than average fee (0.0001) is that correct?

The "average fee" you are quoting is not enough for a transaction from this address. It is enough for your "average" address, but there are transactions that require far higher than average transaction cost.
See https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_fees for a description of how the transaction fee depends on the transaction size (0.1 mBTC (0.0001 BTC) per thousand bytes).

Topic: Open wallet with 0.09252 BTC ? (Read 1919 times)