Pages:
Author

Topic: Opinions of core dev on the change! - page 2. (Read 54468 times)

hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 509
August 20, 2015, 07:04:12 AM
#2
Well, obviously you can add Greg Maxwell and the rest of the devs as Core proposers lol. Im pretty certain Nick is also supportive of Core. Actually few people are supporting core beside Gavin and Hearn themselves.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1004
August 20, 2015, 06:54:23 AM
#1
Hi

I saw a lot of press and article on the fork problem but will like to know the opinion of some person.

Website with some answer : http://bipsxdevs.azurewebsites.net/


Gavin and Mike : ok we know XT

Wladimir J. van der Laan : Core

Jeff Garzik : Core

Gregory Maxwell : Core

Pieter Wuille : Core
     - https://gist.github.com/sipa/c65665fc360ca7a176a6

Adam Black : Core
     - https://www.reddit.com/user/adam3us
     - http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/computing/networks/the-bitcoin-for-is-a-coup

P. Kaufmann : ?

Cory Fields : ?

Matt Corallo : ?

Nick Szabo : Core
     -https://twitter.com/NickSzabo4/status/633011973634961408

Upal Chakraborty : Core
     - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bip-106-dynamically-controlled-bitcoin-block-size-max-cap-1154536
     - http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010285.html
     - http://upalc.com/maxblocksize.php

Charlie Lee (litecoin core dev) : Core
     - https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3hp190/charlie_lee_nuclear_option_of_forking_the/cu9e4tj

I will like to create a table of + and - to see what dev think about this.

THanks
Pages:
Jump to: