Options for core people who consider core the real bitcoin? - page 2.

kelsey

legendary

Activity: 1876

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Kprawn on August 20, 2015, 08:30:52 AM

Unfortunately only one of the two forks will win in the end, and the rest will have to follow the winning fork.

certainly you can keep both forks going. if people decide to keep the cores fork, even if XT gained the most nodes, they certainly could (although one or both would tank in price, and both would tank in value).

keep the true bitcoin core going, even if XT the alt, gains traction and majority it'll be shortlived like all previous competing alts.

Kprawn

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1074

Unfortunately only one of the two forks will win in the end, and the rest will have to follow the winning fork. Sad

The sad thing is, both sides have exellent engineers and developers and we might lose some of these

guys to the competition. {BankCoins / GovCoins} Why can they not just sit around a table, and sort this whole block size debate out, once and for all. Huh

We have two opposing sides with strong arguments and

a lot of self interest and pride getting in the way. Let's just hope sanity will prevail and people would be able to see through all this BS. Roll Eyes

n2004al

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1000

Quote from: spartacusrex on August 20, 2015, 06:04:49 AM

come on.. no 'spite' please.. that's a mug's game. (You can't just 'KEEP RUNNING CORE' if the network went with XT or vice versa.. Sorry.. That's not how it works.. Unless you want to mine a worthless chain)

there is ONLY EVER ONE SOLUTION TO END WAR.

It's called PEACE..

or 'Kiss and Make Up'

The Core Boys, Mike, Gavin and the rest of them need to sit the F**K down and have some milk and cookies.

The really cool thing is - IT'S NEVER TOO LATE.

Gold words bro! The peace can solve everything and it is the only thing that can bring solutions acceptable for all and at the interest of all. So away the knives, welcome to the wine and go ahead with discussions until the good and overall solution will come.

All the other things must be away from bitcoin.

Digit-0

full member

Activity: 199

Merit: 100

in the end, you only find the beginning

Quote from: tadakaluri on August 20, 2015, 03:59:38 AM

We all must need to support Bitcoin Core at this movement. If anything need to change, it must be implement in Bitcoin Core only. We can't entertain other Groups/Persons to make forks for Bitcoin, which will lead to end of Bitcoin.

not only at this movement, if we already have something good, why to change it? if core need changes in future we can change it, so i cant understand why "some" people still want to change things that can be working fine, maybe they have other intentions?

spartacusrex

hero member

Activity: 718

Merit: 545

come on.. no 'spite' please.. that's a mug's game. (You can't just 'KEEP RUNNING CORE' if the network went with XT or vice versa.. Sorry.. That's not how it works.. Unless you want to mine a worthless chain)

there is ONLY EVER ONE SOLUTION TO END WAR.

It's called PEACE..

or 'Kiss and Make Up'

The Core Boys, Mike, Gavin and the rest of them need to sit the F**K down and have some milk and cookies.

The really cool thing is - IT'S NEVER TOO LATE.

everaja

hero member

Activity: 490

Merit: 500

~ScapeGoat~

Quote from: kelsey on August 20, 2015, 02:56:05 AM

what are the options? keep core alive no matter the outcome?

There are certainly Two options only as mentioned by You, each have their Own Advantages and Disadvantages.
XT: 1.Wants Block size to be increased to 8 MB.
   2.Wants users to switch to Centralized node which will be run only by groups of People.

Outcomes: 1.As the the Block size will increase there will be more Transactions per second.
   2. All the powers will remain in hands of few Miners and it thus effect the spirit of Bitcoin , i.e, Decentralization.
   3.. Some Tor related Issues are also there as each scheduled time all IPs will be stored to mark spam transactions and as a result it will affect the anonymity of people for which bitcoin is Famous.

As seen from Present scenario if Some node runners accept Bitcoin XT then it will be fine else there will be Two of them with different Peotocols and there may be situation that a transaction may be confirmed by one of them but it wont appear on the other as other has not accepted that.

In short: Every thing gonna be messy.

Kazimir

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1011

As long as we all just keep using Bitcoin Core, we'll be fine.

As a matter of fact I am installing a new Core node as we speak.

I'm pro increasing the block size (preferably in a moderate fashion, not going from 1 to 8 MB) but a separate client, risking Bitcoin to be split in Core and XT, is VERY BAD.

kelsey

legendary

Activity: 1876

Merit: 1000

i believe supporters should keep the core going no matter what, if the imposter managers to fake majority node support, keep to the core, keep it functioning.

valiz

sr. member

Activity: 471

Merit: 250

BTC trader

Keep core running no matter what!

And keep it updated

. Who knows, maybe we need some mempool improvements if "Coinwallet" (cough.. XT cough...) launches a massive spam attack.

tadakaluri

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

We all must need to support Bitcoin Core at this movement. If anything need to change, it must be implement in Bitcoin Core only. We can't entertain other Groups/Persons to make forks for Bitcoin, which will lead to end of Bitcoin.

kelsey

legendary

Activity: 1876

Merit: 1000

what are the options? keep core alive no matter the outcome?

Topic: Options for core people who consider core the real bitcoin? - page 2. (Read 1161 times)