A bit of a conundrum...
It's not the socialist economy product you're imagining. You can own whatever you want, you could've bought at $220 if you were old enough in 2015 for example - what was stopping you?
I'm happy with what I hodl at atm, so my op was more a general remark.
If we assume 4 billion people have a constant supply of food and water, then you need 0.00525BTC to have something realistic to hold or use in the future.
For 8 billion people, 0.003btc will be out of reach to quite a lot of them so you could also go with that.
21000000 people can only own 1 bitcoin (population that size is tiny, like 4 new Zealand, less than half of England, 2+ individual Scandinavian countries).
210000000 people can only own 0.1, that's less than everyone in the US.
2100000000 people can only own 0.01, that's less than China and indias cumulative population...
Interesting numbers, i know Bitcoin is an exclusive club for those of us who realised its potential early
and with the limited supply not everyone is going to own the amount what they would like.
In 2012, the common goal was
2,100 BTC (1% of 1% of the max supply). That's what it takes to be a member of the "Vladimir Club."
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-vladimir-club-98239Just pointing out, this is a constantly evolving thing. The "target minimum" will always become smaller as the price rises. The trend should be negatively correlated to the adoption curve. It was once 2,100. Then it was 100. Then it was 1. Next, it'll be 0.01......
As far as being out of reach, what we need are Layer 2 solutions (and also physical bearer usage) that allow people to transact in minute BTC amounts and with extremely low/no fees. We're years away from that being realized in a large scale, sustainable way. It's still coming, but we should be prepared for investors to price the future in
now.
I guess in the future we will be saying, "I picked up 15,000 Satoshi's today"
I get it that the target ownership will shift as the price rises and everyone will create their own target