hi i found this for your list
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19661605
Topic: Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns [Last update: 01-Jan-23] - page 167. (Read 1025396 times)
July 18, 2017, 12:15:52 AM
July 17, 2017, 07:51:59 PM
To small screen users: Please leave a comment of your view on the table. Does it fit to your screen? WorkingForBitcoins seems a long name and it might have affected some of you. I will shorten it if it did.
Im on an iPad and it doesn't all display, but I can scroll left/right without too much difficulty. Cuts off right at the 'Max' column for me in landscape mode.
And just a related question so I'm understanding this right, if a Junior member were to join 777coin and they make 80 posts in a week then that would payout .048 BTC, correct?
It's 0.0048 BTC not 0.048BTC. You're missing a zero.
Thanks for the comment by the way, I'll edit the WorkingForBitcoins tomorrow to WorkingFor BTCEdit: Actually I'll do it now. Please leave a comment about it again.
To small screen users: Please leave a comment of your view on the table. Does it fit to your screen? WorkingForBitcoins seems a long name and it might have affected some of you. I will shorten it if it did.
On laptop everything looks correct. My screen resolution for sure is not the highest, so most users should be able to see it without problems.
Damnit! Math in public is not my strong suit! Thanks for the correction. New format looks perfect to me, the only thing that is cut off now is under the escrow column when there is a 'Y/N' the N gets cut off.
July 17, 2017, 02:15:01 PM
Thanks, my primary concern was people that use a phone or tablet to browse. People that are using a phone will do a landscape mode to view the table but can they see it without having to scroll left/right is the question.
Using the developer tools on Chrome I checked with various devices and found that the smallest one listed (iPhone 5) was still able to view the entirety of the chart.
July 17, 2017, 10:41:37 AM
To small screen users: Please leave a comment of your view on the table. Does it fit to your screen? WorkingForBitcoins seems a long name and it might have affected some of you. I will shorten it if it did.
Im on an iPad and it doesn't all display, but I can scroll left/right without too much difficulty. Cuts off right at the 'Max' column for me in landscape mode.
And just a related question so I'm understanding this right, if a Junior member were to join 777coin and they make 80 posts in a week then that would payout .048 BTC, correct?
It's 0.0048 BTC not 0.048BTC. You're missing a zero.
Thanks for the comment by the way, I'll edit the WorkingForBitcoins tomorrow to WorkingFor BTCEdit: Actually I'll do it now. Please leave a comment about it again.
To small screen users: Please leave a comment of your view on the table. Does it fit to your screen? WorkingForBitcoins seems a long name and it might have affected some of you. I will shorten it if it did.
On laptop everything looks correct. My screen resolution for sure is not the highest, so most users should be able to see it without problems.
July 17, 2017, 10:15:30 AM
To small screen users: Please leave a comment of your view on the table. Does it fit to your screen? WorkingForBitcoins seems a long name and it might have affected some of you. I will shorten it if it did.
On laptop everything looks correct. My screen resolution for sure is not the highest, so most users should be able to see it without problems.
July 17, 2017, 09:58:52 AM
To small screen users: Please leave a comment of your view on the table. Does it fit to your screen? WorkingForBitcoins seems a long name and it might have affected some of you. I will shorten it if it did.
Im on an iPad and it doesn't all display, but I can scroll left/right without too much difficulty. Cuts off right at the 'Max' column for me in landscape mode.
And just a related question so I'm understanding this right, if a Junior member were to join 777coin and they make 80 posts in a week then that would payout .048 BTC, correct?
July 17, 2017, 05:28:36 AM
To small screen users: Please leave a comment of your view on the table. Does it fit to your screen? WorkingForBitcoins seems a long name and it might have affected some of you. I will shorten it if it did.
July 16, 2017, 08:14:30 PM
C'mon, you're full member, you are wearing paid signature and you still don't know about it? And you are asking in wrong place.
There must be a one reason for this, its either a bought account or someone gives him an account here (which is less chance to happen)A new signature campaign, WorkingforBitcoin.com sig camp => https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/workingforbitcoinscom-signature-campaign-srmember-above-8-spots-left-2025475 only for Sr and above
Code:
Rates
Sr member- .005/week
Hero+- .005/week
Sr member- .005/week
Hero+- .005/week
July 16, 2017, 07:08:15 PM
My stance on this: I don't have any campaigns that will pay on/near August 1st, but should there be a campaign that I'm managing that would pay on August 1st, I would hold the payments until after the problems are over. Participants would receive the Bitcoin on both forks, if a second one emerges and is stable.
Bitmixer would be the confusing one here. I think that the payouts are handled automatically (Lauda doesn't handle them, at least). YoBit would be similar, but I believe the BTC is credited to their YoBit account so YoBit probably held the funds anyway.Hopefully they maintain it properly and withhold payments from being too near BIP 148.
How do we know that we approved for a campaign? Do we have to search spreadsheets or do we get a message?
C'mon, you're full member, you are wearing paid signature and you still don't know about it? And you are asking in wrong place. July 16, 2017, 04:58:37 PM
How do we know that we approved for a campaign? Do we have to search spreadsheets or do we get a message?
July 16, 2017, 04:51:05 PM
My stance on this: I don't have any campaigns that will pay on/near August 1st, but should there be a campaign that I'm managing that would pay on August 1st, I would hold the payments until after the problems are over. Participants would receive the Bitcoin on both forks, if a second one emerges and is stable.
Bitmixer would be the confusing one here. I think that the payouts are handled automatically (Lauda doesn't handle them, at least). YoBit would be similar, but I believe the BTC is credited to their YoBit account so YoBit probably held the funds anyway.Hopefully they maintain it properly and withhold payments from being too near BIP 148.
We don't want to see spamming and false scam accusations against signature campaigns for not paying a few hours/days before 1st August or after (If a chain split occurs).
If they didn't understand why payments were being withheld for a couple of days or they started scam accusations over that, they were probably spammers anyway. But yeah, still a good idea to clarify. July 16, 2017, 01:36:18 PM
New campaign managed by me called PicoStash.
Fixed weekly payments, min 30 posts, 0.023BTC for Hero+, 0.021BTC for Senior Members and 0.013BTC for Full Members. I'm escrowing funds.
My stance on this: I don't have any campaigns that will pay on/near August 1st, but should there be a campaign that I'm managing that would pay on August 1st, I would hold the payments until after the problems are over. Participants would receive the Bitcoin on both forks, if a second one emerges and is stable.
Fixed weekly payments, min 30 posts, 0.023BTC for Hero+, 0.021BTC for Senior Members and 0.013BTC for Full Members. I'm escrowing funds.
It could be a good idea to add a notice or something regarding the upcoming possible fork. We don't want to see spamming and false scam accusations against signature campaigns for not paying a few hours/days before 1st August or after (If a chain split occurs).
This post make sense, hoping that some signature campaign owners and managers make some post related this coming fork or maybe someone open a thread about this. Anyways not proper thread to discuss this topic.My stance on this: I don't have any campaigns that will pay on/near August 1st, but should there be a campaign that I'm managing that would pay on August 1st, I would hold the payments until after the problems are over. Participants would receive the Bitcoin on both forks, if a second one emerges and is stable.
July 16, 2017, 11:14:31 AM
It could be a good idea to add a notice or something regarding the upcoming possible fork. We don't want to see spamming and false scam accusations against signature campaigns for not paying a few hours/days before 1st August or after (If a chain split occurs).
This post make sense, hoping that some signature campaign owners and managers make some post related this coming fork or maybe someone open a thread about this. Anyways not proper thread to discuss this topic. July 16, 2017, 10:32:44 AM
Interesting . Can I get more information Id love to be a part of some of these .
July 16, 2017, 02:21:47 AM
It could be a good idea to add a notice or something regarding the upcoming possible fork. We don't want to see spamming and false scam accusations against signature campaigns for not paying a few hours/days before 1st August or after (If a chain split occurs).
July 12, 2017, 04:30:44 AM
OP updated. Sorry that it took so long.
July 10, 2017, 10:22:47 PM
Thank you.nice work.wnat to more update
July 09, 2017, 09:46:57 PM
Payments for BitBleder got adjusted, the new numbers are:
L - 0.027 | H - 0.025 | S - 0.022
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20039274
L - 0.027 | H - 0.025 | S - 0.022
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20039274
July 09, 2017, 06:14:58 PM
There are now more slots in the ChipMixer campaign so it can be moved back to A (from CFNP)
July 06, 2017, 02:43:11 AM
A new signature campaign (Target Coin): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2005892.0;topicseen
Rates (min: 10 - max: 30 posts):
Rates (min: 10 - max: 30 posts):
Code:
Full member: 0.0003 BTC/post
Sr. member: 0.0004 BTC/post
Hero/Legendary: 0.00052 BTC/post
Jump to: