Exactly! LTU_btc has a point. Why should I put in the list id you're reputation is so bad. Having 2 campaign is not enough and having too many negative feedbacks are not badly needed. I must prefer to add new bounty managers that already finished at least 1 bounty campaign successfully to help the to have more projects that also helps the forum especially. Participating on a red tagged manager is not safe because it will not go smoothly unlike those trusted bounty managers.
If You have the ability to read you can easily see that Jamal told that he has two of his projects listed on top 100 CMC, and not that he has just 2 campaigns under his belt.
Your inability to read this simple sentence, makes a lot of questions of your ability to select the good managers.
I manage bounties too if you guys don't know.
2 of the projects I managed listed on top 100 in CoinMarketCap. so probably i am the best.
trust ratings have nothing to do with bounty management skills. I am like Godfather of bounty programs. half of bounty managers listed in OP are copying my bounty threads. my rules and terms. these are all started from me.
How you can say that? Most of your trust ratings are related to bounty management, I'll just quote one of the ratings:
The constancy with which issues aries wherever jamal is involved lead me to believe they are not just simply incompetent, they are maliciously mismanaging and mishandling projects they've been entrusted with.
If you have previously hired jamal for a service and they've delivered a sub-par result, ask your money back.
If you are considering to hire them, take a look at their history before.
References is one of many instances (TaaS, Ascendancy, Etheriya, to name a few), exemplary for this general rating about their person.
Being manager of high number of campaigns doesn't mean that you're good manager, projects probably chose you because you asked for less money or something. And accepting worst spammers, alt accounts and abusers doesn't makes you good manager.
And if you are saying that other managers copying your rules, therms and etc, you should provide some proofs, otherwise it's just whataboutism.
I have seen him handle campaigns with more than 5000 Members and it is not so easy to handle altcoin social media campaigns with such high number of users. Although i do agree in some cases he has been scammed by the project owners and in other times maybe sometime things do tend to slow down if there is a one man army.
I am not defending him but i feel sorry for the
Centralized nature of this forum which give undue advantage to the ones who are not in the DT list. I am sure no one is 100% perfect and if every manager is tagged for every mistake then i am sure you will see every manager would have been painted Red. but since he is not in the DT list, other DT managers felt it easy to outclass competition by red trust.
I think theymos has to rethink and impose such rules like DT members will not be allowed to become a campaign manager etc, otherwise this forum will be a paradise for the few people.
It has been said that the purpose of the forum is to use it as a discussion and not as a earning platform but unfortunately it is these
DT Members involved in signature campaigns managers along with their hidden army, who have actually hijacked the forum.