Pages:
Author

Topic: Overview of recent username changes in Bitcointalk - page 2. (Read 1905 times)

legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 13334
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
But for trusted and reputed users, it can turn confusing especially if they are escrows and traders as to find out their old username would be very tough. It's better if Theymos later adds a feature where you can find the old username (or have it displayed below the new username).

If users want their old username known they can put it into their personal text under the avatar and carry it there for a few months. That's what I would do if I ever decide to change my username (yes, I realize some asshole will try to impersonate me now).

This make sense, if that user wishes to do so....
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Hah!  Or, reverse all display names.  renimbi   VecyoL    noomhcus   _onireduD lE     ratSklaT    <-- these would drive me crazy for the day  Grin

This gives an unfair advantage to the junior member of the cycling club.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
If users want their old username known they can put it into their personal text under the avatar and carry it there for a few months. That's what I would do if I ever decide to change my username (yes, I realize some asshole will try to impersonate me now).
For April 1st, we should get theymos to exchange our usernames Cheesy I'm curious if anyone would even notice.
legendary
Activity: 1789
Merit: 2535
Goonies never say die.
or that guy  Roll Eyes
Bah, who cares what that guy thinks?  Tongue   The other guy is a full member who seemed more recently active but I guess he's not that active *shrug* a username is a username, just wouldn't want anyone attempting an impersonation on you later on and people getting confused. One can hope people aren't that stupid but.. well.. people have fallen for these things before. The guy seems legitimate enough not to do that though. Wink

I do like the name though, who doesn't like the big lebowski??  It's a classic!  Smiley

I'm thinking it's time for me to change my name to IBJesus. Nobody fucks with the Jesus. And I feel like I've been fucked with a bit recently, so it might work out for me lol.


edit:
For April 1st, we should get theymos to exchange our usernames Cheesy I'm curious if anyone would even notice.
Hah!  Or, reverse all display names.  renimbi   VecyoL    noomhcus   _onireduD lE     ratSklaT    <-- these would drive me crazy for the day  Grin
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
But for trusted and reputed users, it can turn confusing especially if they are escrows and traders as to find out their old username would be very tough. It's better if Theymos later adds a feature where you can find the old username (or have it displayed below the new username).

If users want their old username known they can put it into their personal text under the avatar and carry it there for a few months. That's what I would do if I ever decide to change my username (yes, I realize some asshole will try to impersonate me now).
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1094
I also spoke to one user who changed his username recently "Murat" and when he said he worked with me earlier, I was surprised that he could change as earlier this option was available on to few users.

But for trusted and reputed users, it can turn confusing especially if they are escrows and traders as to find out their old username would be very tough. It's better if Theymos later adds a feature where you can find the old username (or have it displayed below the new username).
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 13334
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
Then, check the field after "To:" on the new message you're sending.

This didn't work for me. "To:" just has the new username... did something change?

I bet this guy is like "heeeyyy wtf!"  Grin

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/el-duderino-1302818
^
or that guy  Roll Eyes

Probably we all just love Lebowski or the dude or duder or his dudeness or just "El duderino"
copper member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 737
✅ Need Campaign Manager? TG > @TalkStar675
I am little bit surprised after seeing that some of our community user have changed their old username and put new one. I don't think that its was an wise decision for them and hopefully many others will be agree with me. In bitcointalk there is millions of users but personally i don't know all one by one and its not possible for anyone too but some names have been saved on my memory because of two reason.

No 1: I know some best contributors for their unforgettable contribution and hard work for the forum. In this criteria i prefer to accept scam busters, quality posters, donators, default trusted members, campaign managers and some more extraordinary people. Wherever i see their name it remind me their working background and obviously their contribution too. So definitely i can say that my thinking creates with their username not with the real person behind that account.

No 2: After seeing some username i can easily recognize proven scammers, spammers, loan defaulters, account sellers and many more people who are connected with fraudulent activities. Its because there is open scam accusation against them and my memory saved their username as bad guys. So in this part same as past i don't know their real identity but their username is pushing my mind to invent their working background.

In conclusion i wanna say that it doesn't matter if you have a weird username or bad looking one but it really matters how community users are connected with your old username. Yeah maybe you can get new one but definitely that will not give you the respect or acceptance like old one. Your username is the symbol of your past doings.      
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1989
฿uy ฿itcoin
Killyou72 just sounds much better off the tongue, amirite??

He will be forever known as Killyou72 (or Killyou73) Grin.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 6830
Then, check the field after "To:" on the new message you're sending.

This didn't work for me. "To:" just has the new username... did something change?

I bet this guy is like "heeeyyy wtf!"  Grin
My guess is that this only works when only the display name was changed.

If you do the above with Murat (old iwantapony) it works (only display name changed - for appearance reasons). But if you do with mk4 (old mjglkw) it doens’t work (both display and login name changed - for privacy reasons).

Some context about the privacy/appearance name change reasons: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53569598
legendary
Activity: 1789
Merit: 2535
Goonies never say die.
Then, check the field after "To:" on the new message you're sending.

This didn't work for me. "To:" just has the new username... did something change?

I bet this guy is like "heeeyyy wtf!"  Grin
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
This would be something theymos could create: a new rank that shows you're an old user, without disclosing your old account.
If Admin only creates such accounts for users who made a name for themselves, it could be a solution to have and eat the cake!
I too wouldn't mind having more privacy, but once it's gone, there's no way to get it back.

That would be something, but if your new rank, for example, shows as "New Legendary" instead of just "Legendary" then that new account get's "noticed" as well, and some internet detective is going to connect the dots. Anything but the original rank is going to arouse suspicion.

As well, a brand new account with a rank higher than Newbie, would look interesting if it had 0 merits and 1 post or something like that, ... assuming it gets created with the minimum required for that rank, then it would start out with 1000 merits for Legendary, but none earned (and of course no sMerits to give out), I don't think the post count would display properly.

Anyone wanting to actually use the new account would have to "prepare" it by posting real posts for a few days to make it look "normal", then granted the rank or something.

Obviously, any feedback or reputation from the old account would not transfer to the new one.

If it's too much work, admins won't do it and just avoid the issue altogether. And finally, creation date, will it be "today" or back dated?
copper member
Activity: 3948
Merit: 2201
Verified awesomeness ✔
Why grant the name change for these users if this was going to be the result?
I'm almost certain that most name changes aren't done to hide who they are. I mean, if you fucked up in the past and change your name to hide that, there will always be quotes off your old name. Plus trust feedback and flags don't change, so what's the point in doing that? The only way to truly start over is to create a new account.

A name change will, of course, still increase your privacy a little bit, but all I'm trying to say is that there will always be posts that contain your old name. Maybe even positive trust ratings where they mention your old name.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 4554
Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing
I thought most bitcoiners were all about anonymity, security, and privacy? Seems to me that outing these users when they changed their usernames, would be an invasion of privacy. I'm sure each and every one of them had a reason to change their name correct?

Now with this thread, the name change was mostly worthless for most of the users who requested it. I see some arguing that the only way to get away from it completely would be to start all over. Well, that is of course an option, but then they lose their rank. That may or may not be important to everyone, but I know some of these guys earn money in signature campaigns so starting over may not have been an option unless they didn't mind losing the income.

Why grant the name change for these users if this was going to be the result?
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
May be for scrappers like LoyceV, DdmrDdmr and others will find some difficulties with this username changes but with the system, I think we are really fine.
Correct. When updating my Trust list viewer, "missing" names give an error which requires manual intervention. After that, my Trust list viewer shows the new name from that week onwards. Older versions still show the old name though.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Did someone thought about the effect of this username changes on the other users trust lists who have included or excluded them ? Like trust list is organised by using the usernames of the accounts and not UID so even after username change the UID remains same and only the username would be changed. Most of the user's trust list would be up with one of the old username and all gets messed up.
The trust list in our trust setting page, takes the usernames but stores in the database using the userID (u). So changing username is not effecting anyone trust list. I had El duderino_ in my trust list when he had his previous username and I see it has been changed to El duderino_ without needing any touch from me.

May be for scrappers like LoyceV, DdmrDdmr and others will find some difficulties with this username changes but with the system, I think we are really fine.

That's not cool. I hope mods make an exception for asu otherwise he'll get banned for evasion if some asshole reports him.
Technically yes but practically it will be very wrong. Rules are made (al-thought we do not have any official rules) to protect the community not to use against it.

If we act practical then I do not see any problem at all.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Anyways, the account registered by @asu under micgoossens username is autobanned by some logical mod around.

That's not cool. I hope mods make an exception for asu otherwise he'll get banned for evasion if some asshole reports him.
sr. member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 415
Did someone thought about the effect of this username changes on the other users trust lists who have included or excluded them ? Like trust list is organised by using the usernames of the accounts and not UID so even after username change the UID remains same and only the username would be changed. Most of the user's trust list would be up with one of the old username and all gets messed up.



Anyways, the account registered by @asu under micgoossens username is autobanned by some logical mod around. I don't think you need to worry about it again El duderino_. Enjoy your privacy !

Code:
Autoban user: N/A in topic #0 by member #2744287


legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 13334
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
The primary idea behind the creation of this topic is to have a transparency in the change of user names and to prevent further confusion among the new users or someone who is not really having a grasp on these changes recently. The idea behind the topic wasn't to break the privacy of the above mentioned users in the name of revealing their new usernames and I further believe that these forum name changes shouldn't go unnoticed in a forum which deals with reputation and money. We have been noticing various scams which are being used by scammers to trick newbies in the name of reputed users over here and in telegram as well.

I have been part of various torrenting forums for quite a long time (8+ years) where username changes are quite common and we could change the names whenever we like and none does care about that. But as far as this forum is concerned, each username carries a reputation and if the reputation is being mishandled by scammers, we would be seeing unnecessary loss of funds which would turn the plates towards the older user names. To prevent these bizarre circumstances, I have created this topic. This was one among the important reasons why theymos removed the username change feature from this forum.

There is always one satoshi, one sirius, one cobra, one theymos, one micgoossens, one Pamoldar in this bitcoin ecosystem! Fraudsters like CSW shouldn't claim himself to be satoshi nor does any forum scammer shouldn't claim themselves as micgoossens or Pamoldar and these recent name changes should never pave way for those situations.

I said last post a little bit up here, but serious bro.... I know probably best intentions etc

But all those above points are similar like minerjones (real deal) a scammer names himself minerjones. (or whatever)
The copy will be revealed by the forum ASAP more fast as a newbie finding out in this thread or where ever who is who.....

Like micgoossens is taken—-> instant red trust problem solved, each name that’s been changed then the previous could be banned or made and given red trust to prevent all the above ....

From this OP I know it’s best intentions as I seen him before creating and contributing (I do respect you)
-though I would think our points to have some meaning etc and some people a bit disappointed me but whatever the world is still round and going..... so that’s that

But I could easily think a dozen of names if they made this thread I would say just some merit hunting going on...


legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
There seems to hardly be any way to have your cake and to eat it too - I mean retaining some of the benefits of the credibility carried over from the old name to the new name, so of course, there can be some benefits in changing your user name, but seemingly the ONLY way to completely lose the connection of the possible negatives that have come to your old user name would be to create a new account and to really start over.. and maybe not even mention the old user name in connection with the new account.

There is also security through obscurity, too.. and there are likely other means of attempting to NOT draw the wrong kinds of attention to yourself.. and the interwebs are filled with fucktwats..
This would be something theymos could create: a new rank that shows you're an old user, without disclosing your old account.
If Admin only creates such accounts for users who made a name for themselves, it could be a solution to have and eat the cake!
I too wouldn't mind having more privacy, but once it's gone, there's no way to get it back.

I am not sure if your proposal is really fair for other members, so a lot of this remains a kind of balance in which many of us might come to differing conclusions.  Of course, if we are in a BAD situation, we might want to have as many benefits as we can get, but if we are NOT in the situation, we might blame the other user(s) for possibly contributing to his/her own problem by employing weak OpSec.  So, yeah, there are degrees, and sometimes even the ability of members to go back and wipe all of their previous posts can be a cost upon the membership to have to suffer with members who seem to NOT take responsibility for their earlier posts.. but then again, 4 or more years later, there might be some motivations for members to delete some prior disclosures.. and sometimes even to edit earlier posts to change what had actually been said and the context.

Surely, I am NOT proclaiming to know any of the answers exactly, even for myself, because even I understand that I am likely NOT the same person who I was nearly 6 years ago when I began posting in this forum.  Also, sometimes I might disagree with some kind of content of the post of another person, or even some kind of mixing of real world and forum situations, or become sympathetic to something that seems to have had happened to another member in the real world that might be attributable to forum information/conduct, but then the circumstances are NOT always well known or even knowable either.  I have thought one way about the circumstances of another forum member, and then a third forum member comes into the scene to assert another scenario that I had not considered in my prior assessment.

When I first joined the forum, I, actually, was quite bothered by forum practices that allowed editing or deleting of prior posts, but now, I understand that there can be some value to members who might get themselves into a bit of a pickle (and might not even have had been of their own creation) and might need to edit or delete some or all of their earlier posts without asking for permission from forum administrators.. even while the forum itself may end up suffering somewhat from the removal of some of those earlier contributions and context for other posts that might have been built around their earlier posts.
Pages:
Jump to: