I guess it's stupid to keep pointing out he's scammed millions until I can provide the proof in a way everyone can understand.
Yes this is probably the lesson to be learnt from the past 15 months. If you're going to accuse someone of being a scammer, then create a proper thread in scam accusations, with the correct format and relevant evidence for users to act upon. Slandering people from the sidelines (even if true) will get you nowhere it seems, only losing DT1 support, statistically speaking.
Not very easily I'm afraid, as most of this data was easy to obtain thanks the the DT strength within loyce.club. There was just some gaps to fill in from when either user wasn't selected as part of DT1, and therefore their strength did not appear.
You can quite easily get the DT2 strength by counting DT1 inclusions minus exclusions for those weeks.
Indeed, although as the graph sub-title suggests, I calculated the DT1 strength (as opposed to DT2 strength) for these graphs for either user not being in DT1.
Ie, the DT1 strength calculated is irrelevant of whether the users were elected into DT1 at the time or not, in order to keep the numbers more consistent.
All my negative trust comes from going too far in scam busting.
I'm not convinced this is the case, it's probably more likely to do with the following:
I guess it's stupid [...] until I can provide the proof
