[Owner gone AWOL] Website Preview: BITADS.NET. Now Pay-Per-Day! - page 23.

ranlo

legendary

Activity: 1988

Merit: 1007

Quote from: Cyberdyne on August 28, 2013, 08:30:34 PM

Quote from: btcton on August 28, 2013, 08:28:47 PM

It is actually pay-per-hour, it is simply displayed as pay-per-day for... eh... "Simplicity's sake." Or so I had thought.

So if I put 0.01 in "Minimum Bid", people have to pay at least 0.01 per hour?

No, it's like this:

Your bid is per day but is charged per hour.

IE. you bid 24 BTC. This is 24 BTC a day. Instead of charging 24 BTC up-front or at the end of the day, it does 1 BTC an hour. Essentially it's like a pro-rated system.

btcton

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1007

Quote from: Cyberdyne on August 28, 2013, 08:30:34 PM

Quote from: btcton on August 28, 2013, 08:28:47 PM

It is actually pay-per-hour, it is simply displayed as pay-per-day for... eh... "Simplicity's sake." Or so I had thought.

So if I put 0.01 in "Minimum Bid", people have to pay at least 0.01 per hour?

Scratch that, check my edit.

Cyberdyne

hero member

Activity: 630

Merit: 500

Quote from: btcton on August 28, 2013, 08:28:47 PM

It is actually pay-per-hour, it is simply displayed as pay-per-day for... eh... "Simplicity's sake." Or so I had thought.

So if I put 0.01 in "Minimum Bid", people have to pay at least 0.01 per hour?

btcton

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1007

Quote from: Cyberdyne on August 28, 2013, 08:20:34 PM

So, is this really pay per day now?

On the Create Adspace page, PLEASE clarify this input:

Minimum Bid

Make it say something like:

Minimum Bid (per hour)
or
Minimum Bid (per day)
or
Minimum Bid (per square inch)

Or whatever is correct. As it stands now, this input is vague to newcomers like myself who am not sure what the number I input there really represents.

~~It is actually pay-per-hour, it is simply displayed as pay-per-day for... eh... "Simplicity's sake." Or so I had thought.~~
EDIT: Hang on, I didn't read that carefully. I actually have no idea, good question.

Cyberdyne

hero member

Activity: 630

Merit: 500

So, is this really pay per day now?

On the Create Adspace page, PLEASE clarify this input:

Minimum Bid

Make it say something like:

Minimum Bid (per hour)
or
Minimum Bid (per day)
or
Minimum Bid (per square inch)

Or whatever is correct. As it stands now, this input is vague to newcomers like myself who am not sure what the number I input there really represents.

btcton

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1007

Hmmm, for the reasons mentioned previously I now think that seeing the hourly rate might be better.

Mitchell

copper member

Activity: 3948

Merit: 2201

Verified awesomeness ✔

I still would love to see an option to switch between hour and day prices. I mean, the amount I get doesn't stay the same all day long. It was around 0.04 in the morning, 0.08 in the afternoon and now its 0.092. I would like to see it per hour, because that is more precise.

ingrownpocket

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ingrownpocket on August 15, 2013, 07:59:46 AM

I don't think clicks are being counted correctly.

https://bitads.net/?p=bid&id=38
https://bitads.net/?p=bid&id=184
https://bitads.net/?p=bid&id=76

Like I said before, there's something wrong with clicks count.
Sometimes it shows negative clicks, and I need to refresh the page.

Mooshire

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Kind of annoying to have to wait this long for my payout Tongue

ranlo

legendary

Activity: 1988

Merit: 1007

Quote from: BitVegas on August 25, 2013, 01:44:58 PM

Quote from: Mitchell on August 25, 2013, 12:48:35 PM

Shit, I withdrew to the wrong address. Could you please send the BTC0.0453 to "1JxvSh6wFww5Cjd3waTtuS4yeYeDrs2CVe" instead of "18i3PzeDPMNAg9Kcux1hvyPnSoJ4yo7u7k"?

Sure no problem!

As for per-day or per-hour. The advertisers are starting to pick up again for per-day. I'll see how this goes and wait for some more feedback before a decision is made.

It's possible that what happened caused confusion. IE. the system started out as per-hour for some advertisers, so when it jumped up to per-day they may have not noticed that difference and thought "whoa, the prices just jumped up by over 20x what they were. I'm out!" I have the feeling this is what happened.

Mitchell

copper member

Activity: 3948

Merit: 2201

Verified awesomeness ✔

Quote from: BitVegas on August 25, 2013, 01:44:58 PM

Quote from: Mitchell on August 25, 2013, 12:48:35 PM

Shit, I withdrew to the wrong address. Could you please send the BTC0.0453 to "1JxvSh6wFww5Cjd3waTtuS4yeYeDrs2CVe" instead of "18i3PzeDPMNAg9Kcux1hvyPnSoJ4yo7u7k"?

Sure no problem!

As for per-day or per-hour. The advertisers are starting to pick up again for per-day. I'll see how this goes and wait for some more feedback before a decision is made.

Thank you, I received it. Long live manual payouts!

And that sounds like a good idea.

BitVegas

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: Mitchell on August 25, 2013, 12:48:35 PM

Shit, I withdrew to the wrong address. Could you please send the BTC0.0453 to "1JxvSh6wFww5Cjd3waTtuS4yeYeDrs2CVe" instead of "18i3PzeDPMNAg9Kcux1hvyPnSoJ4yo7u7k"?

Sure no problem!

As for per-day or per-hour. The advertisers are starting to pick up again for per-day. I'll see how this goes and wait for some more feedback before a decision is made.

Mitchell

copper member

Activity: 3948

Merit: 2201

Verified awesomeness ✔

Shit, I withdrew to the wrong address. Could you please send the BTC0.0453 to "1JxvSh6wFww5Cjd3waTtuS4yeYeDrs2CVe" instead of "18i3PzeDPMNAg9Kcux1hvyPnSoJ4yo7u7k"?

ranlo

legendary

Activity: 1988

Merit: 1007

Quote from: Mitchell on August 24, 2013, 11:06:27 AM

Quote from: ingrownpocket on August 24, 2013, 10:38:56 AM

Quote from: Mitchell on August 24, 2013, 09:47:31 AM

Quote from: whiskers75 on August 23, 2013, 10:10:37 AM

I vote go back to hours - my ads aren't doing good either. Sad

I have to agree. Or create an option to switch between those two and set the standard value to "Per Hour".

That doesn't make much sense TBH.
I highly doubt advertisers are that stupid, I mean, c'mon, it's the exact same thing... 0.5, 1/2...

Apparently not. I lost a huge amount of advertisement 1-2 days after the implementation of the 24 hour system. It went down to zero 2 days later. Now it's slowly climbing back up and I changed my price's back to normal, but still.

I know it sounds stupid, I cannot believe it myself, but that is just how I experienced the change.

It's not really "stupid," it's how we infer things. 0.1 BTC an hour sounds a lot better than 2.4 BTC a day, for example. Smaller numbers are always "better."

It's really along the same lines as the marketing gimmick for discounts. If you have an item for $5.00 and then offer two coupons: one for 50% off and one for $2.50 off, and ask which is the better deal, people will almost always choose one over the other, even though they are exactly the same. It's how our brains play tricks on us, :p.

Mitchell

copper member

Activity: 3948

Merit: 2201

Verified awesomeness ✔

Quote from: ingrownpocket on August 24, 2013, 10:38:56 AM

Quote from: Mitchell on August 24, 2013, 09:47:31 AM

Quote from: whiskers75 on August 23, 2013, 10:10:37 AM

I vote go back to hours - my ads aren't doing good either. Sad

I have to agree. Or create an option to switch between those two and set the standard value to "Per Hour".

That doesn't make much sense TBH.
I highly doubt advertisers are that stupid, I mean, c'mon, it's the exact same thing... 0.5, 1/2...

Apparently not. I lost a huge amount of advertisement 1-2 days after the implementation of the 24 hour system. It went down to zero 2 days later. Now it's slowly climbing back up and I changed my price's back to normal, but still.

I know it sounds stupid, I cannot believe it myself, but that is just how I experienced the change.

ingrownpocket

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Mitchell on August 24, 2013, 09:47:31 AM

Quote from: whiskers75 on August 23, 2013, 10:10:37 AM

I vote go back to hours - my ads aren't doing good either. Sad

I have to agree. Or create an option to switch between those two and set the standard value to "Per Hour".

That doesn't make much sense TBH.
I highly doubt advertisers are that stupid, I mean, c'mon, it's the exact same thing... 0.5, 1/2...

Mitchell

copper member

Activity: 3948

Merit: 2201

Verified awesomeness ✔

Quote from: whiskers75 on August 23, 2013, 10:10:37 AM

I vote go back to hours - my ads aren't doing good either. Sad

I have to agree. Or create an option to switch between those two and set the standard value to "Per Hour".

ranlo

legendary

Activity: 1988

Merit: 1007

Quote from: BitVegas on August 24, 2013, 09:35:49 AM

Quote from: ranlo on August 23, 2013, 10:14:35 AM

Bug report: when you have the sites grouped by domain, it doesn't sort them properly. For example, if you choose to sort by views, you will notice that some of the higher-viewed sites won't be on page one. If you skip to page two or further you may see them. It's actually a little odd how that works. Essentially each page has its own tier going from highest -> lowest, rather than the entire listing being from highest (#1 on page 1) to lowest (#x on page x -- last).

When sorting without the domain grouping on it works fine.

Thanks. Fixed now.

Perfect, thank you!

BitVegas

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: ranlo on August 23, 2013, 10:14:35 AM

Bug report: when you have the sites grouped by domain, it doesn't sort them properly. For example, if you choose to sort by views, you will notice that some of the higher-viewed sites won't be on page one. If you skip to page two or further you may see them. It's actually a little odd how that works. Essentially each page has its own tier going from highest -> lowest, rather than the entire listing being from highest (#1 on page 1) to lowest (#x on page x -- last).

When sorting without the domain grouping on it works fine.

Thanks. Fixed now.

ranlo

legendary

Activity: 1988

Merit: 1007

Bug report: when you have the sites grouped by domain, it doesn't sort them properly. For example, if you choose to sort by views, you will notice that some of the higher-viewed sites won't be on page one. If you skip to page two or further you may see them. It's actually a little odd how that works. Essentially each page has its own tier going from highest -> lowest, rather than the entire listing being from highest (#1 on page 1) to lowest (#x on page x -- last).

When sorting without the domain grouping on it works fine.

Topic: [Owner gone AWOL] Website Preview: BITADS.NET. Now Pay-Per-Day! - page 23. (Read 33752 times)