p2p way to discourage fraud - page 2.

remmy

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

Quote from: Rassah on August 02, 2011, 10:15:08 AM

Your idea is already implemented in the Bitcoin protocol https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Contracts
but was disabled due to bugs/issues. You could press on the developers to fix the issues and re-implement it again, maybe? Or ask someone else to get it working in a different client/miner.

(Satoshi thought of everything Grin

)

Thank you for the link, I have looked at this page and its escrow section, but it doesn't mention decentralizing escrow. It specifically shows three parties working together by exchanging keys. The escrow service could collude with the sender or the receiver to abuse the trust placed in it.

remmy

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

Quote from: JoelKatz on August 02, 2011, 10:19:06 AM

This doesn't really work. What typically happens in the fraudster says "Sorry, I can't go through with the deal because . Release the funds and I'll reimburse you." Now, what's your incentive to destroy them?

Since the funds are promised, the victim will insist that the fraudster reimburse first. This does turn the tables because now the victim can cause the fraudster to lose coins, but the victim doesn't profit directly.

In both cases, you can only cause someone to lose coins, you can't get them yourself. I argue that there are a smaller number of people who would want you to lose your coins for an indirect benefit than there are "men who want to watch the world burn".

iamzill

sr. member

Activity: 677

Merit: 250

Quote from: JoelKatz on August 02, 2011, 10:19:06 AM

Quote from: remmy on August 01, 2011, 11:40:54 PM

The sender has two options with promised coins, finish payment, or destroy. Destroyed coins are returned to the unmined coin count or just eliminated from circulation.

This essentially eliminates the receiver's benefit of defrauding senders. Senders also cannot defraud receivers since they cannot get the coins back, they can only destroy them.

This doesn't really work. What typically happens in the fraudster says "Sorry, I can't go through with the deal because . Release the funds and I'll reimburse you." Now, what's your incentive to destroy them?

Bingo. Denial of service.

Suppose NSA/SS/Random asshole/bitter ex just want you to lose money. They can start a transaction, and after you send the promise, ignore you thereafter. It cost them 0 bitcoins, 1 minute of typing, and gives them 10 minutes of trolling entertainment. It will cost you the entire transaction amount. Classholes will even write bots to do this for the lulz, I promise.

Please excuse the cliché hollywood quote, but: "Some men just want to watch the world burn.".

JoelKatz

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1012

Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.

Quote from: remmy on August 01, 2011, 11:40:54 PM

The sender has two options with promised coins, finish payment, or destroy. Destroyed coins are returned to the unmined coin count or just eliminated from circulation.

This essentially eliminates the receiver's benefit of defrauding senders. Senders also cannot defraud receivers since they cannot get the coins back, they can only destroy them.

This doesn't really work. What typically happens in the fraudster says "Sorry, I can't go through with the deal because . Release the funds and I'll reimburse you." Now, what's your incentive to destroy them?

Rassah

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1035

Your idea is already implemented in the Bitcoin protocol https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Contracts
but was disabled due to bugs/issues. You could press on the developers to fix the issues and re-implement it again, maybe? Or ask someone else to get it working in a different client/miner.

(Satoshi thought of everything Grin

)

BitOffer

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Your ideal would work a majority of the time. Best of all, no 1-2% escrow fee, or insurance withheld. Unfortunately, some won't release the funds after the trade is finished, even tho they can't get them back(laziness-envy-who-knows why).

Who can we trust?, (-no one is the answer). The best risk management tool we have is trust in community/p2p.

remmy

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

Quote from: nmat on August 02, 2011, 12:16:54 AM

But yeah, I can set up a fake store to destroy promised coins just for fun Tongue

Can you think of any other ways to break this idea? If that is the only one, I would gladly take it over the current situation.

nmat

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 502

Quote from: ffuentes on August 02, 2011, 12:10:34 AM

What I want when I've been scammed is to recover my money, not its destruction.

Since the scammer will not earn anything with this, he will not have a reason to do it.

But yeah, I can set up a fake store to destroy promised coins just for fun Tongue

remmy

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

the problem with being able to recover your money is that it makes the senders capable of defrauding the receiver (send the coins then take them back after receiving the service). i'm trying to eliminate fraud from all parties.

remmy

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

incorporating more features of escrow services:

in addition to release or destroy on promised coins, a sender could release a portion of them, proportional to the amount of work done.

as for the implementation details, it is a fork to the existing protocol and would require majority support. i'm not sure if the protocol is extensible enough to handle an addition like this while still remaining backwards compatible (a client that doesn't recognize promise transactions can simply use the current send coins method). i don't understand satoshi's bitcoin code yet, so i can't say for sure how hard it would be to implement.

ffuentes

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Only a curious passer-by / FirstBits: 13zsc1

Quote

- in a centralized model, coins are never destroyed. either the sender has them or the escrow service has them or the receiver has them. destroying coins is like paying the entire community for helping run the service by decreasing the number of bitcoins in circulation (or recirculating them).

What I want when I've been scammed is to recover my money, not its destruction. Could be a good idea but I don't get it completely and we need more technical explanation about.

nmat

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 502

Quote from: foggyb on August 02, 2011, 12:05:10 AM

I like it.

+1

But I don't know anything about the technical implications of this.

foggyb

legendary

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1006

I like it.

remmy

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

- in a centralized escrow service, the sender and receiver need to trust the escrow provider. the escrow provider could defraud the sender or the receiver or both.

- the centralized escrow provider is a middleman taking a fixed fee or a percentage, the decentralized version could run on the existing low cost transaction system that bitcoin already enjoys.

- in a centralized model, coins are never destroyed. either the sender has them or the escrow service has them or the receiver has them. destroying coins is like paying the entire community for helping run the service by decreasing the number of bitcoins in circulation (or recirculating them).

haploid23

legendary

Activity: 812

Merit: 1002

what you're describing is pretty much the same thing as escrow service

remmy

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

Bitcoin is a lot like cash in that consumers can be too easily defrauded. Is there any way to discourage fraud using bitcoin technology?

I am thinking about something along the lines of an addition to the bitcoin protocol and program:

Next to the send coins button, a "promise coins" button. The coins are removed from the sender's account, but not deposited into the receiver's account. An entry is created in the block chain representing a "promise" of coins from sender to receiver. The receiver sees "promised" in their transaction history. The receiver either completes or does not complete the deal to the satisfaction of the sender. The sender has two options with promised coins, finish payment, or destroy. Destroyed coins are returned to the unmined coin count or just eliminated from circulation.

This essentially eliminates the receiver's benefit of defrauding senders. Senders also cannot defraud receivers since they cannot get the coins back, they can only destroy them.

Topic: p2p way to discourage fraud - page 2. (Read 3188 times)