in the wrong thread(this thread), but very related..
Can't delete..
Might as well quote it..
I forced them to start an escrowed campaign.
Your forced them did you?
I'm not sure what to think about "forcing" them to escrow anything.. Escrow is an option and not something that should be "forced" I think..
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53170993That was the only thing I could do, to ensure that participants will be paid. And I guess they found Lauda as an escrow, which means 100% safe campaign. There are a lot of scam accusations and some People think that this exchange is a scam (Including me). Exchange representatives are denying accusations. So, let potential traders read what is mentioned in scam accusations, study supporting evidence and make up their own minds.
How convenient.. Surely it will be 100% safe now...
There are a lot of scam accusations and some People think that this exchange is a scam (Including me).
It is suddenly OK to advertise scams as long as they are using escrow?
In that way, you wan't be able to scam anyone who will participate in the campaign. I wan't remove any tag from you or other accounts that are related to p2pb2b because I still consider it as a scam exchange. But I will not tag any participant and you can go ahead if there will be a reputable escrow for this campaign.
So you would have tagged participants if they didn't escrow? Or, you won't tag if they do use escrow?
WTF does them escrowing campaign funds have anything to do with it being a scam or not?
Are you some sort of authority who can "force" them to escrow and give them the "go ahead" to advertise a scam?
That is correct. This exchange has a lot of scam accusations and as I said, I still consider it as a scam, but as you said a lot of users eager to make a living off bounties. As far this dudes are promising to pay in BTC and escrow the funds, let the mentioned users (Bounty hunters) make some money out of the offered campaign.
Well no shit bounty hunters are eager to make some scratch by
spamming advertising no matter if it a scam they are shilling or not.. They/many don't care as long as they can get their piece of the action..
So, does this set the precedent that DT is going to allow the advertisement of scams as long as they escrow their advertisement funds?
All these poor bounty hunters should be able to make some coin by advertising scams and ponzis as long as it is escrowed?
I forced them to start an escrowed campaign.
they found Lauda as an escrow
Yeah, it should start any day now and that's the very least that I can do.
This could be interpreted as facilitating a scam or at the very least now a conflict of interest..
-
No, there is nothing you can say that would change the opinions that users have formed on
p2pb2b and its sister scam
coinbitI'm about to accept escrowing their campaign
Sure, if you are happy to proceed that way then that something you have thought through but my issue remains with the scam aspect.
Just because they might in future run a scam-free bounty campaign does not make it a scam-free project because the bounty campaign is directly related to p2pb2b being promoted.
p2pb2b2 have been selective
scamming users
Hmm....
the bounty manager doesn't have the heart and the courage P2PB2B management should fire him, for not showing the guts, this thread should be locked and bring their business to other forums, I recommend Cryptotalk people there are asking, for the campaign. 
