Author

Topic: [pandacoin] The Panda Coin ♥ Scrypt Adaptive-N w/Kimotos Gravity Well ★ - page 138. (Read 398951 times)

member
Activity: 115
Merit: 10

Luck is not the issue here. To get a proper p2pool we need the good parameters and a lot of MH/s. VTC p2pool is above 200MH/s, and that's good. Anyway there is an issue here the share parameter window is too high here, that prevents us to do coins switching when the difficulty is updated. (*24 is too high, I think *4 is OK...).

And to get a lot of p2pool nodes we must avoid confusion.

Ahh now you tell the real issue you have with the settings.
I highly suggest you go with traditional Pool if you want to often switch Coins. Thats not the typical Scenario P2Pool was designed for.

Also the whole switch+mine+dump mentality makes me really sick. Im into cryto for profits too but not at all costs!!
Imho just look at VTC to see what this does to a very promising looking coin.

Anyways if you want to discuss this further join IRC #p2pool-panda or PM me, no reason to Spam the whole Thread with our P2Pool issues.

Traditional pool are worst for such an usage too. You will lost a lot of GPU power, dead on arrival may be very high. And most pools use now PPLNS, too avoid switch at the block level, here it makes senses, the block value is random like doge, mining a block close to 1 is worthless... Anyhow I don't think you expect this coin to be over doge in the long run. Don't you?



And i'm pretty sure that you never expected Doge to become that big, didnt you ?


Indeed, No...
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0

Luck is not the issue here. To get a proper p2pool we need the good parameters and a lot of MH/s. VTC p2pool is above 200MH/s, and that's good. Anyway there is an issue here the share parameter window is too high here, that prevents us to do coins switching when the difficulty is updated. (*24 is too high, I think *4 is OK...).

And to get a lot of p2pool nodes we must avoid confusion.

Ahh now you tell the real issue you have with the settings.
I highly suggest you go with traditional Pool if you want to often switch Coins. Thats not the typical Scenario P2Pool was designed for.

Also the whole switch+mine+dump mentality makes me really sick. Im into cryto for profits too but not at all costs!!
Imho just look at VTC to see what this does to a very promising looking coin.

Anyways if you want to discuss this further join IRC #p2pool-panda or PM me, no reason to Spam the whole Thread with our P2Pool issues.

Traditional pool are worst for such an usage too. You will lost a lot of GPU power, dead on arrival may be very high. And most pools use now PPLNS, too avoid switch at the block level, here it makes senses, the block value is random like doge, mining a block close to 1 is worthless... Anyhow I don't think you expect this coin to be over doge in the long run. Don't you?



And i'm pretty sure that you never expected Doge to become that big, didnt you ?
member
Activity: 115
Merit: 10

Luck is not the issue here. To get a proper p2pool we need the good parameters and a lot of MH/s. VTC p2pool is above 200MH/s, and that's good. Anyway there is an issue here the share parameter window is too high here, that prevents us to do coins switching when the difficulty is updated. (*24 is too high, I think *4 is OK...).

And to get a lot of p2pool nodes we must avoid confusion.

Ahh now you tell the real issue you have with the settings.
I highly suggest you go with traditional Pool if you want to often switch Coins. Thats not the typical Scenario P2Pool was designed for.

Also the whole switch+mine+dump mentality makes me really sick. Im into cryto for profits too but not at all costs!!
Imho just look at VTC to see what this does to a very promising looking coin.

Anyways if you want to discuss this further join IRC #p2pool-panda or PM me, no reason to Spam the whole Thread with our P2Pool issues.

Traditional pool are worst for such an usage too. You will lost a lot of GPU power, dead on arrival may be very high. And most pools use now PPLNS, too avoid switch at the block level, here it makes senses, the block value is random like doge, mining a block close to 1 is worthless... Anyhow I don't think you expect this coin to be over doge in the long run. Don't you?
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
There may be believers out there, but some of us are just sitting on the fence. With popcorn.

i'm really just here for the money
full member
Activity: 239
Merit: 103

Luck is not the issue here. To get a proper p2pool we need the good parameters and a lot of MH/s. VTC p2pool is above 200MH/s, and that's good. Anyway there is an issue here the share parameter window is too high here, that prevents us to do coins switching when the difficulty is updated. (*24 is too high, I think *4 is OK...).

And to get a lot of p2pool nodes we must avoid confusion.

Ahh now you tell the real issue you have with the settings.
I highly suggest you go with traditional Pool if you want to often switch Coins. Thats not the typical Scenario P2Pool was designed for.

Also the whole switch+mine+dump mentality makes me really sick. Im into cryto for profits too but not at all costs!!
Imho just look at VTC to see what this does to a very promising looking coin.

Anyways if you want to discuss this further join IRC #p2pool-panda or PM me, no reason to Spam the whole Thread with our P2Pool issues.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
But you are right, it's in vain to talk sense to the people. Believers are believers and stay believers. Facts are dismissed.

There may be believers out there, but some of us are just sitting on the fence. With popcorn.
newbie
Activity: 59
Merit: 0

Here's the thing man, i really don't pay much attention to estimates unless after 24 hrs of mining something is way off. like 900 coins in 24 hrs. if you do the math it doesn't make any sense no matter what you plug in or how far you move the decimal point. I had the same problem mining doges, people think because they are getting a decent payout that they are not getting screwed but if you switch a few times and find a good pool that's when you realize just how bad you got hosed. This kind of crap has to stop if crypo's are ever going to evolve. I wasn't trying to be a dick and binary clock is a good dude so who knows maybe its something with the server i dont know, I just go by what i'm putting in and what i'm getting out, if it's close than i'm cool but if it's obvious and painfully low then i get pissed. i think the only way to keep pools honest is to spread the word.

as far as that other panda coin i could care less, i mine every new coin for a few hours just to pile them up in case it takes off later. doesn't everybody?

Yep I agree with your first point, that sends well off. Your idea of a pool review sounds useful, though it does sound as if different people have different experiences with these pools. Have you checked your latency between the pools? Would be interesting if the ones that didn't work out so well had a higher latency than those that more accurately reflect your hash rate.

As for your last point - I couldn't possibly argue, I am mining flippin' PANDA after all...
member
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
As it has been said before, derbrause. If you have kept the p2pool parameters available before, a lot of more blocks will be there. Splitting p2pool is always a bad idea...

Im not derbrause start actually reading posts from other people!

And the settings have nothing to do with how many Blocks are found. Just the Payout Distribution.
Also i you had read the post you would see that our Luck right now is insane good so there is nothing to complain about.

One of the nodes which ran in the alternating P2Pool Network switched this morning to our net. So there is only one P2Pool Network right now which is doing very good and has a fair Payout distribution which honors People that stay at least 24 Hours in P2Pool.

Thats the P2Pool i wanted for Pandacoin and 60 Mh/s see this the same way  Wink

Luck is not the issue here. To get a proper p2pool we need the good parameters and a lot of MH/s. VTC p2pool is above 200MH/s, and that's good. Anyway there is an issue here the share parameter window is too high here, that prevents us to do coins switching when the difficulty is updated. (*24 is too high, I think *4 is OK...).

And to get a lot of p2pool nodes we must avoid confusion.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
sr. member
Activity: 339
Merit: 250
Vice versa is not a meal.
Is there a request to add it on cryptsy ?
member
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
PANDACOIN now on coinmarketcap.com

full member
Activity: 239
Merit: 103
As it has been said before, derbrause. If you have kept the p2pool parameters available before, a lot of more blocks will be there. Splitting p2pool is always a bad idea...

Im not derbrause start actually reading posts from other people!

And the settings have nothing to do with how many Blocks are found. Just the Payout Distribution.
Also i you had read the post you would see that our Luck right now is insane good so there is nothing to complain about.

One of the nodes which ran in the alternating P2Pool Network switched this morning to our net. So there is only one P2Pool Network right now which is doing very good and has a fair Payout distribution which honors People that stay at least 24 Hours in P2Pool.

Thats the P2Pool i wanted for Pandacoin and 60 Mh/s see this the same way  Wink
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
So just my 2 cents.  I have been with dedicated since I started and have had no issues.  Payouts have been just where I expect them.  The y have gone down a few times but my failovers (poolerino, pandacoin.org) filled in well.  From what I can see all pools calculate the expected coins the same way and all give the same value for my small hashrate (1400 Kh/s).

What are the problems others are seeing?
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
As it has been said before, derbrause. If you have kept the p2pool parameters available before, a lot of more blocks will be there. Splitting p2pool is always a bad idea...

yeah true
member
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
As it has been said before, derbrause. If you have kept the p2pool parameters available before, a lot of more blocks will be there. Splitting p2pool is always a bad idea...
full member
Activity: 239
Merit: 103
Join P2Pool NOW

P2Pool Speed grow to 55 mh/s in a few hours  Grin

3 Blocks Found so far:

Feb 18 2014 11:01:07 GMT+0100
Feb 18 2014 12:48:32 GMT+0100
Feb 18 2014 13:51:59 GMT+0100

Not that bad for an expected Blocktime of 4 Hours  Shocked


www.reddit.com/r/thepandacoin/comments/1y6bgh/p2pool_nodes_up/
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
is there a cudaminer version for this, or am I barking up the wrong tree...

Cudaminer works great just make sure you use version 02-04-2014 and throw the --algo=scrypt:2048 switch.

What I use:
cudaminer.exe --algo=scrypt:2048 -H 1 -i 0 -l your cuda kernel -C 1 -m 1 -o stratum+tcp://domain:port -O Worker:Password

Jump to: