Now look who is misquoting.
Someone has issues....
Heh, yeah, right. Forgot the context:
Thanks for the crash course into day trading.
This was your reply to my question on why do the panic sale threads always ignore that these high volume sales have to have a high volume buy counterpart. I assumed from the reply that you were being ironic, sarcastic or simply an ass. If none of these options is correct and you were really thanking me for the crash course then, hmmm, you have bigger issues than I do.
On the other hand if it was actually any of the 3 options described, then I can safely say that your quoted reply can be read as
you are a stupid moronic knowitall
Wouldn't you agree? On second thought you probably won't, because that's your thing... I respect that, we have to be consistent with our internet selfs. As an example, if you follow my post history you'll find that some 50% of my post are attempts at comic irony, all ending in disastrous misunderstandings. People here take other people too seriously but again as long as we keep it consistent...