The dynamic situation of cryptocurrency these days in general responded by three ways: selling panicly with the risk of cut-loss in order to save the remaining assets from more fallen, hold the assets and playing save by not doing any trading activities, and view the phenomenon as a diamond chance then buying coins in huge amounts of investments while the prices are low. Of course, those three ways are logically humane and each has their own pluses and minuses.
I am intrigued upon the first two: panic selling and postponing from trading.
On doing panic selling, ones tend to sell their assets in the price lower than in the actual price. The main goal is to sell their coins faster to save themselves from the worse situation, without consideration upon the impact of their behaviour towards the market in general.
Meanwhile, ones could also hold their assests and postpone from doing any trading activities, in order to keep their assets safe and even maybe went on hiatus from digital assets bussiness while waiting for the bullish days to be back. They don't want to sell their assets in low price, but the act of not doing any trading is logically also has impact in general. At least, it is contributing on slower the trading traffic.
In your opinion, which one is the worse way among the two?
Panic selling is the worse thing someone could do out of impulsiveness and emotions. They might sell their assets with a price lower than its buying price just so they can avoid much worse situations without doing some critical thinking. They tend to lost sight of the bigger picture and massive impact of their actions. It's much worse because his action won't just affect him but he will contribute to the market's movement in general. So, of all things, when people are trading tbey should also train theirselves not to be easily driven by their emotions, because emotion is of all things the most destructive in any ways, patience, practicality and calmness should always win over emotions.