Halfway down here: https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2019705/all you can see a photo in which someone has cables plugged into two mini pcie connectors on a laptop motherboard.
Topic: Passively splitting a single PCI-E 16x slot into 16 PCI-E 1x slots (Read 27786 times)
If you Google for "diy vidock x2" you'll come across threads in which folks have combined 2 pcie x1 lanes into a single x2 connection for the purpose of connecting external videocards to laptops. If they can do that, then surely we can do the reverse, right?
Halfway down here: https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2019705/all you can see a photo in which someone has cables plugged into two mini pcie connectors on a laptop motherboard.
Halfway down here: https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2019705/all you can see a photo in which someone has cables plugged into two mini pcie connectors on a laptop motherboard.
March 08, 2014, 01:06:34 PM
Linux has a hard limit of 8 cards. I see reports of people using 13 on windows.
Where you saw these reports? Thanks
Edit: I found it.
http://devgurus.amd.com/thread/158863
Original source is currently unavailable, but I have located i ton the web archive.
http://web.archive.org/web/20130429065445/http://fastra2.ua.ac.be/
March 08, 2014, 08:48:25 AM
Linux has a hard limit of 8 cards. I see reports of people using 13 on windows.
Where you saw these reports? Thanks
June 18, 2013, 10:34:56 PM
I can see where having a Cable Y adapter w/maybe an inline chip would be a great thing, because it would free up the limited motherboard selections that allow 4 or 6 GPU's
However, a main problem is the Windows OS + card drivers seem to currently be limiting the number of popular GPU cards to 6.
However, a main problem is the Windows OS + card drivers seem to currently be limiting the number of popular GPU cards to 6.
Linux has a hard limit of 8 cards. I see reports of people using 13 on windows.
June 18, 2013, 10:22:20 PM
I can see where having a Cable Y adapter w/maybe an inline chip would be a great thing, because it would free up the limited motherboard selections that allow 4 or 6 GPU's
However, a main problem is the Windows OS + card drivers seem to currently be limiting the number of popular GPU cards to 6.
However, a main problem is the Windows OS + card drivers seem to currently be limiting the number of popular GPU cards to 6.
June 18, 2013, 06:24:22 PM
Dude, your avatar kinda freaks me out.
On the other note - what's the point of "13 gpus" if your power supply cannot handle it?
Or you will have multi psu setup as well?
You can get large PSUs that can handle lots of cards. On the other note - what's the point of "13 gpus" if your power supply cannot handle it?
Or you will have multi psu setup as well?
June 18, 2013, 12:00:55 PM
It looks like it's passive, as in doesn't need external power. But it's obviously not as simple as a Y-connector.
June 18, 2013, 11:56:27 AM
It's way too expensive but I like the idea.
June 18, 2013, 11:44:09 AM
Dude, your avatar kinda freaks me out.
On the other note - what's the point of "13 gpus" if your power supply cannot handle it?
Or you will have multi psu setup as well?
On the other note - what's the point of "13 gpus" if your power supply cannot handle it?
Or you will have multi psu setup as well?
Obviously.
and try to stop looking at it.
June 18, 2013, 11:16:17 AM
Dude, your avatar kinda freaks me out.
On the other note - what's the point of "13 gpus" if your power supply cannot handle it?
Or you will have multi psu setup as well?
On the other note - what's the point of "13 gpus" if your power supply cannot handle it?
Or you will have multi psu setup as well?
June 18, 2013, 11:07:33 AM
The problem is: does the Windows operating system recognising 10, 16 or more GPU?
I'm hearing reports of windows running with up to 13 GPU's. I have also heard that linux (which version or distro?) has a hard limit of 8 GPU's.
Subject to support in the bios or by the motherboard, I suppose.
June 18, 2013, 09:33:27 AM
The problem is: does the Windows operating system recognising 10, 16 or more GPU?
virtualization. 
June 18, 2013, 04:15:19 AM
The problem is: does the Windows operating system recognising 10, 16 or more GPU?
June 17, 2013, 08:24:58 PM
I have no idea. But maybe. Too expensive to be worth it, though.
It doesn't have to be passive. It's just that if it is possible for it to be passive, it will allow for simple wiring of riser cables to work.
I see. What is it for, anyways? Keeping timing in sync? and if so, Is it not possible to share the "control signals"?
Silly question: why does it have to be passive?
It doesn't have to be passive. It's just that if it is possible for it to be passive, it will allow for simple wiring of riser cables to work.
Its not completely passive. A PCIE x16 slot has 16 data lanes, but only 1 set of control signals. Each x1 slot requires a set of control signals.
See pinouts:
http://pinouts.ru/Slots/pci_express_pinout.shtml
See pinouts:
http://pinouts.ru/Slots/pci_express_pinout.shtml
I see. What is it for, anyways? Keeping timing in sync? and if so, Is it not possible to share the "control signals"?
I'm not completely certain... SMBus signals can be shared via a simple splitter, and I'm not sure if JTAG is necessary, but Reference Clock is going to need some circuitry to be split, and something probably needs to be done to the detect signals. I haven't read the PCI-E spec, so I'm going off pinouts and some guesses only.
June 17, 2013, 08:01:00 PM
it's not passive, there are microcontrollers on the board.
It's listed as passive. Perhaps the microcontroller isn't important. Anyways, someone else here showed another one that is fully passive.
June 17, 2013, 07:23:47 PM
it's not passive, there are microcontrollers on the board.
June 17, 2013, 04:40:43 PM
Why do you need a powered riser? NO! NO! NO!.
Besides, the adapter already has a PCI-E power plug for supplemental power. Theres your power right there.
Besides, the adapter already has a PCI-E power plug for supplemental power. Theres your power right there.
June 17, 2013, 03:44:23 PM
I have no idea. But maybe. Too expensive to be worth it, though.
It doesn't have to be passive. It's just that if it is possible for it to be passive, it will allow for simple wiring of riser cables to work.
I see. What is it for, anyways? Keeping timing in sync? and if so, Is it not possible to share the "control signals"?
Silly question: why does it have to be passive?
It doesn't have to be passive. It's just that if it is possible for it to be passive, it will allow for simple wiring of riser cables to work.
Its not completely passive. A PCIE x16 slot has 16 data lanes, but only 1 set of control signals. Each x1 slot requires a set of control signals.
See pinouts:
http://pinouts.ru/Slots/pci_express_pinout.shtml
See pinouts:
http://pinouts.ru/Slots/pci_express_pinout.shtml
I see. What is it for, anyways? Keeping timing in sync? and if so, Is it not possible to share the "control signals"?
June 17, 2013, 03:37:43 PM
And if it has to be passive, would this work: http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-Supermicro-RSC-R2UG-2E4E8-Riser-Card-/320906465389
June 17, 2013, 03:36:39 PM
Silly question: why does it have to be passive?
Jump to: