HAHAHAHA! Now I know you are desperate. Nice appeal to "authority", as if Snopes qualifies. Snopes is shit, and so are your pathetic attempts at an argument.
So, you've read the patent, and your conclusion is that they were intending to use it with some sort of device embedded in peoples flesh, instead of something like a smartphone, fitbit, watch...etc.
Pretty nuts how much influence these conspiracy sites have over people.
This isn't an argument. This is a character attack. Pretty nuts how people think appeal to authority is a logical argument. Furthermore such a thing as you describe it would not qualify for a patent.
"Even if the subject matter sought to be patented is not exactly shown by the prior art, and involves one or more differences over the most nearly similar thing already known, a patent may still be refused if the differences would be obvious. The subject matter sought to be patented must be sufficiently different from what has been used or described before that it may be said to be non-obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the area of technology related to the invention. For example, the substitution of one color for another, or changes in size, are ordinarily not patentable."
"A patent cannot be obtained upon a mere idea or suggestion. The patent is granted upon the new machine, manufacture, etc., as has been said, and not upon the idea or suggestion of the new machine. A complete description of the actual machine or other subject matter for which a patent is sought is required."
https://www.uspto.gov/patents-getting-started/general-information-concerning-patentsThe concept of using devices to monitor bodily activity with crypto using such devices is itself not novel. A device which can track and monitor body activity, if nothing more than a "fitbit or a smartphone", by your own argument and definition is not a new concept and therefore not patentable.
More references:
"ID2020 Alliance launches digital ID program with Government of Bangladesh and Gavi, announces new partners at annual summit"
"The American multinational technology company joined ID2020 in January 2018 as a founding partner. Members of the Microsoft team sit on ID2020’s Technical and Program Delivery Advisory Committees."
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/id2020-alliance-launches-digital-id-program-with-government-of-bangladesh-and-gavi-announces-new-partners-at-annual-summit-300921926.html"Storing medical information below the skin’s surface"
"The research was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Koch Institute Support (core) Grant from the National Cancer Institute."
http://news.mit.edu/2019/storing-vaccine-history-skin-1218https://www.reddit.com/r/Coronavirus/comments/fksnbf/im_bill_gates_cochair_of_the_bill_melinda_gates/fkupg49/"I’m Bill Gates, co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. AMA about COVID-19."
"Eventually we will have some digital certificates to show who has recovered or been tested recently or when we have a vaccine who has received it."
"DIGITAL DOLLAR WALLET.—The term ‘‘dig-11ital dollar wallet’’ shall mean a digital wallet or ac-12count, maintained by a Federal reserve bank on be-13half of any person, that represents holdings in an 14electronic device or service that is used to store dig-15ital dollars that may be tied to a digital or physical 16identity."
https://financialservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/waters_146_xml_03.23.2020.pdf"Biocompatible near-infrared quantum dots delivered to the skin by microneedle patches record vaccination"
https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/11/523/eaay7162"Are Bill Gates and the ID2020 Coalition Using COVID-19 To Build Global Surveillance State?"
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-id2020/"The study — which was not conducted on human subjects — did not describe the injection of a “microchip” co-administered with a vaccine. Instead, it described the use of something referred to as a quantum dot. These dots are essentially molecule-sized particles engineered to have unique structures that react to near-infrared light in a way that could theoretically be identified by a device such as a smartphone.
It is physically impossible to implant a quantum dot sized device that could actively ping location or any other data to an unknown third party."
You will see the weasel words in bold. You will note, as Snopes often does, they add additional qualifiers in order to claim the whole of the implication is false. They claim because this specific device can not be used for remote tracking, that the claims are false. People object to being tagged like cattle. It has nothing to do with any requirement of being tracked like a GPS unit like Snopes relies on here to disingenuously claim via strawman that what people are objecting to is false.
Which of these sources do you object to TwattySqueal?
