Wondering if it was just fluke that they both went through.
I am not sure what actually made both transactions to confirm, but this looks like the "child pays for parent" transaction fee approach. I am not aware that this approach has been implemented and supported by miners. Could be just luck.
Its impossible to tell without a TX ID, but I would guess that the 2nd transaction was spending the first transaction and thus the second could only be confirmed once the first was confirmed. AFAIK most miners have not implemented child pays for parent and thus this would be entirely coincidential. The 1st TX would probably have confirmed in the same block regardless of the 2nd TX.