So, after reading a thread and realizing that paying with Bitcoin would mean that you'd be paying with future returns,
There is a certain meaning in what has been said. In the sense that if you hols bitcoin in your pockets, it will bring profit in the future, if you spend it now on a purchase as a means of payment. Therefore, I think that in bitcoin the function of a means of payment has been transformed into a means of investment. Therefore, bitcoin owners will be reluctant to spend it.
This also implies that buying goods and services would be faster and easier if more people owned and accepted Bitcoin.
At this stage this is not possible. If more people own (and use) bitcoin, this will put even more strain on the
BTC-network, causing transactions to take even longer to complete. Even with the current user base, the mempool is often overloaded.
If Bitcoin was adopted and accepted as a means of exchange in many countries then there would be a huge improvement in various and global economies.
I accept the possibility that countries will accept bitcoin as an investment instrument, but certainly not as a means of payment. No country (except for countries in a desperate situation with a bad economy) will give up the monopoly on printing the national currency. Because due to this they receive an inflation tax. Simply put, it benefits them.
.
So, I would love to ask and get this confusion over with. Is it ok for you to purchase items with Bitcoin?
It is possible, but the list of goods and services is limited. Also, no one forbids you (yet) to use bitcoin for goods (but doesn't approve either). Still, in every country only the national currency is a legal means of payment for goods and services.