No, I definitely don't blame Eliguis, I blame a major bug in the bitcoin-qt app and Eliguis also confirm this.
As already stated the payments are on the blockchain, just not in my wallet or even recognised by my wallet.
I also have reinstalled a backup and reinstalled the updated QT twice. Once on my O/S and once on my backed up O/S AND the its the exact same thing - The deposits have never made it to the wallet!
Look at all the people rushing to my defence around here-NOT!
They hope ignoring me will make it all go away. But they are in for a rude shock!
I simply cant tell enough people to stay away from this cryptocoin B.S.!
Its just a giant scam! Its had 4 years to come to fruition and nothing. Funniest part is all the Altcoin idiots thinking their coins will be viable when BITRIP can't even be taking seriously and is flawed.
Topic: Payments on blockchain but not in Account - page 2. (Read 3505 times)
I would not blame Eligius as some one can see all the public address's there
Hey I lost 0.047 so I turned the donations to 99% and they still paid the mining
fee to the wallet thief! 14gFWFSg9dxARw2khji4bnJmUYQp56aXbC
Hey I lost 0.047 so I turned the donations to 99% and they still paid the mining
fee to the wallet thief! 14gFWFSg9dxARw2khji4bnJmUYQp56aXbC
Hi, this is the reply I got from Eliguis:
Sounds like a problem with your wallet software/provider. Eligius has sent the payments, its up to your wallet or service to account for them.
Right, I am still in deliberation with Eliguis, but its not looking good so far.
Also have updated to latest V9 Qt and no change has been made!
Sounds like a problem with your wallet software/provider. Eligius has sent the payments, its up to your wallet or service to account for them.
Right, I am still in deliberation with Eliguis, but its not looking good so far.
Also have updated to latest V9 Qt and no change has been made!
I hope you are right, please entertain me with the answer then?
Yes as I thought, re: above comment, no answers to give!!
For anyone else that wants to bomb my thread, if you don't have a solution, please refrain from making yourself look STUPID!
Yes as I thought, re: above comment, no answers to give!!
For anyone else that wants to bomb my thread, if you don't have a solution, please refrain from making yourself look STUPID!
The title is very misleading. lol
Just a quick update, I still have not received a reply from Eliguis.
I also received a new payment yesterday from mining at Eliguis. Funnily enough It went straight through to my wallet.
I hope you bigwigs are still here for me if Eliguis can't explain, because honestly I don't think its a processing holdup.
Oh, and in regards to one of the mods trying to hack me, well today an attempt was made on email account.
Wednesday, March 19, 2014 1:38:31 AM UTC
IP Address: 176.61.140.133
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
But already they have given up!
Such a bitchslap when the only arsenal left is spam!
I'm not happy I tell you.
Press connections I have are very interested though!
I also received a new payment yesterday from mining at Eliguis. Funnily enough It went straight through to my wallet.
I hope you bigwigs are still here for me if Eliguis can't explain, because honestly I don't think its a processing holdup.
Oh, and in regards to one of the mods trying to hack me, well today an attempt was made on email account.
Wednesday, March 19, 2014 1:38:31 AM UTC
IP Address: 176.61.140.133
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
But already they have given up!
Such a bitchslap when the only arsenal left is spam!
I'm not happy I tell you.
Press connections I have are very interested though!
Just received a PM from someone called "freshly picked flower" with ZERO activity
hey there,
im 99% sure i know what the issue is...i get the same problem with egilius. its a simple bug fix in ur local client. if you still need help with it, ill gladly take you up on the teamviewer offer and fix it real quick. let me kno
thx
Please try much harder you scammer!
hey there,
im 99% sure i know what the issue is...i get the same problem with egilius. its a simple bug fix in ur local client. if you still need help with it, ill gladly take you up on the teamviewer offer and fix it real quick. let me kno
thx
Please try much harder you scammer!
hi, yes it all looks ok, but when I check under mined only 3 of the 5 payments come up.
The ones missing are at the top of the post.
Also that amount missing is not in their whatsoever.
happy to use teamviewer if you wish
The ones missing are at the top of the post.
Also that amount missing is not in their whatsoever.
happy to use teamviewer if you wish
REALLY?
You use "Teamviewer"
EXPECT to be very Ripped off!
hi,
Funny you say that, I can tell someone had reconnected last night. The thx for playing popup was on the screen when I turned it on today.
Logfiles had also been deleted.
I have changed the codes now, but I will go reinstall my backup to be sure. Money is still their, but I really don't have anything to ripoff
Scary part is I doubt it was 11 inch's at all, be too obvious. Which only leaves mods that could have seen my P.M.
hmmm Bitcoin - really should have been called Scamcoin!
hi, yes it all looks ok, but when I check under mined only 3 of the 5 payments come up.
The ones missing are at the top of the post.
Also that amount missing is not in their whatsoever.
happy to use teamviewer if you wish
The ones missing are at the top of the post.
Also that amount missing is not in their whatsoever.
happy to use teamviewer if you wish
REALLY?
You use "Teamviewer"
EXPECT to be very Ripped off!
I haven't got to the end of this yet genius!
Got to love how the guy titles the top of this as a major bug in Bitcoin-QT when he really had no idea what he was doing..
You know the bit I don't get is why
2014-03-03 - confirmed
2014-03-07- not confirmed
2014-03-10 - confirmed
2014-03-12 - confirmed
2014-03-15 - not confirmed
all were for pretty much the same amounts.
That link you gave said he did receive the payment just not available for spend.
I simply haven't received those above two payments, anyway will send off email now.
2014-03-03 - confirmed
2014-03-07- not confirmed
2014-03-10 - confirmed
2014-03-12 - confirmed
2014-03-15 - not confirmed
all were for pretty much the same amounts.
That link you gave said he did receive the payment just not available for spend.
I simply haven't received those above two payments, anyway will send off email now.
hi all, ok 11inches recons that they payments are still being processed and yes
validateaddress 1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk
Gave back true, so I must have did what jl2012 said after all.
Swearing at your frustration.....lol....so funny!!
THX TO EVERYBODY!! WILL UPDATE AFTER TALKING TO ELIGUIS.
cheers!
validateaddress 1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk
Gave back true, so I must have did what jl2012 said after all.
Swearing at your frustration.....lol....so funny!!
THX TO EVERYBODY!! WILL UPDATE AFTER TALKING TO ELIGUIS.
cheers!
Ok I will explain again, I am a newbie and half the talk your saying is going past my head about a million k's. Im not a retard, but you need to explain things simply to I get it.
All I got out of that is that one transaction has already been spent, and you agree that why does it not show.
Your confused about the isvalid as much as me!
I have already said -scan did not work and I done it twice. It scanned, but never showed the missing payments. How on earth can you expect the world to take Bitcoin seriously if these problems cannot be understood even by well seasoned user?? The sad part is I am out of pocket here! I seriously cant believe you said it doesn't matter that much!!
All I got out of that is that one transaction has already been spent, and you agree that why does it not show.
Your confused about the isvalid as much as me!
I have already said -scan did not work and I done it twice. It scanned, but never showed the missing payments. How on earth can you expect the world to take Bitcoin seriously if these problems cannot be understood even by well seasoned user?? The sad part is I am out of pocket here! I seriously cant believe you said it doesn't matter that much!!
Well, for a starter, I am saying that there is no fucking way that your bitcoin client (working in a non-testnet mode) would return:
Code:
{
"isvalid" : false
}
Code:
validateaddress 1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk
Either you found a bug in a piece of code that is very well tested (because completely wallet/chainstate independent) - or you cannot even execute a simple command properly.
Not to offend you, but knowing life, my odds are on the later.
In other words, paraphrasing you: how on earth can you expect anyone to take you seriously if the data you are providing are extremely hard to believe in?
he just wasn't sure how to execute the command. he was able to validate it properly shortly after. the transactions in question which he says he is missing from his balance are ones labelled No Inputs (Newly Generated Coins) on the blockchain. to the best of my knowledge, newly generated coins require 100-120 confirmations
Code:
validateaddress 1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk
{
"isvalid" : true,
"address" : "1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk",
"ismine" : false
}
Ok I will explain again, I am a newbie and half the talk your saying is going past my head about a million k's. Im not a retard, but you need to explain things simply to I get it.
All I got out of that is that one transaction has already been spent, and you agree that why does it not show.
Your confused about the isvalid as much as me!
I have already said -scan did not work and I done it twice. It scanned, but never showed the missing payments. How on earth can you expect the world to take Bitcoin seriously if these problems cannot be understood even by well seasoned user?? The sad part is I am out of pocket here! I seriously cant believe you said it doesn't matter that much!!
All I got out of that is that one transaction has already been spent, and you agree that why does it not show.
Your confused about the isvalid as much as me!
I have already said -scan did not work and I done it twice. It scanned, but never showed the missing payments. How on earth can you expect the world to take Bitcoin seriously if these problems cannot be understood even by well seasoned user?? The sad part is I am out of pocket here! I seriously cant believe you said it doesn't matter that much!!
Well, for a starter, I am saying that there is no fucking way that your bitcoin client (working in a non-testnet mode) would return:
Code:
{
"isvalid" : false
}
Code:
validateaddress 1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk
Either you found a bug in a piece of code that is very well tested (because completely wallet/chainstate independent) - or you cannot even execute a simple command properly.
Not to offend you, but knowing life, my odds are on the later.
In other words, paraphrasing you: how on earth can you expect anyone to take you seriously if the data you are providing are extremely hard to believe in?
Interesting point
EDIT: Well, I know what happened:
He ran

Code:
validateaddress <1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk>
Ok I will explain again, I am a newbie and half the talk your saying is going past my head about a million k's. Im not a retard, but you need to explain things simply to I get it.
All I got out of that is that one transaction has already been spent, and you agree that why does it not show.
Your confused about the isvalid as much as me!
I have already said -scan did not work and I done it twice. It scanned, but never showed the missing payments. How on earth can you expect the world to take Bitcoin seriously if these problems cannot be understood even by well seasoned user?? The sad part is I am out of pocket here! I seriously cant believe you said it doesn't matter that much!!
All I got out of that is that one transaction has already been spent, and you agree that why does it not show.
Your confused about the isvalid as much as me!
I have already said -scan did not work and I done it twice. It scanned, but never showed the missing payments. How on earth can you expect the world to take Bitcoin seriously if these problems cannot be understood even by well seasoned user?? The sad part is I am out of pocket here! I seriously cant believe you said it doesn't matter that much!!
Well, for a starter, I am saying that there is no fucking way that your bitcoin client (working in a non-testnet mode) would return:
Code:
{
"isvalid" : false
}
Code:
validateaddress 1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk
Either you found a bug in a piece of code that is very well tested (because completely wallet/chainstate independent) - or you cannot even execute a simple command properly.
Not to offend you, but knowing life, my odds are on the later.
In other words, paraphrasing you: how on earth can you expect anyone to take you seriously if the data you are providing are extremely hard to believe in?
ok just one of you's deal with me ok. PM your mate with your ideas but keep the channel clean so I can stop being overly confussed.
Let start again ok!
Can one of yous please look at what Im saying by Teamviewer please??
Let start again ok!
Can one of yous please look at what Im saying by Teamviewer please??
The transaction with:
2014-03-07 13:32:50 (G) 0.06857834 BTC - https://blockchain.info/tx/e01deb5a9da16da79a8b264d6118372288c135dccc6ee0bce4b57713088ae599
It seems OK.
Your output is even already spent:
https://blockchain.info/tx/1775d4bca4969445122892e576135eba44245628d0274a80dd466f9e1a3fb55d
I don't know why your wallet would not show it in the history, but since the output is already spent it doesn't matter much, does it?
As of this one:
2014-03-15 20:42:02 (S) 0.05883705 BTC
- are you sure that you dont see it after -rescan?
It is still unspent and your wallet you should see it.
I also don't understand why your client would say "isvalid : false", after "validateaddress 1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk"
None of these two thing should happen and none of them make any sense to me.
2014-03-07 13:32:50 (G) 0.06857834 BTC - https://blockchain.info/tx/e01deb5a9da16da79a8b264d6118372288c135dccc6ee0bce4b57713088ae599
It seems OK.
Your output is even already spent:
https://blockchain.info/tx/1775d4bca4969445122892e576135eba44245628d0274a80dd466f9e1a3fb55d
I don't know why your wallet would not show it in the history, but since the output is already spent it doesn't matter much, does it?
As of this one:
2014-03-15 20:42:02 (S) 0.05883705 BTC
- are you sure that you dont see it after -rescan?
It is still unspent and your wallet you should see it.
I also don't understand why your client would say "isvalid : false", after "validateaddress 1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk"
None of these two thing should happen and none of them make any sense to me.
Ok I will explain again, I am a newbie and half the talk your saying is going past my head about a million k's. Im not a retard, but you need to explain things simply to I get it.
All I got out of that is that one transaction has already been spent, and you agree that why does it not show.
Your confused about the isvalid as much as me!
I have already said -scan did not work and I done it twice. It scanned, but never showed the missing payments. How on earth can you expect the world to take Bitcoin seriously if these problems cannot be understood even by well seasoned user?? The sad part is I am out of pocket here! I seriously cant believe you said it doesn't matter that much!!
I really don't understand your problem - the things you describe just don't add up.
There are 3 unspent outputs on that address, amounting to 0.13981465 BTC.
Are you saying that you have a wallet containing a private key to this address, but less than 0.13981465 BTC in it?
And why are you saying that your client answers that "validateaddress 1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk" would be invalid?
It's quite impossible - even my bitcoin-qt says that it is valid, and I don't even have that key.
Please check again your data.
There are 3 unspent outputs on that address, amounting to 0.13981465 BTC.
Are you saying that you have a wallet containing a private key to this address, but less than 0.13981465 BTC in it?
And why are you saying that your client answers that "validateaddress 1JJA3L6UGUtrK3MzscbKdWFt8mrv6eHfkk" would be invalid?
It's quite impossible - even my bitcoin-qt says that it is valid, and I don't even have that key.
Please check again your data.
Jump to: