Topic: People claiming themself satoshi - page 6. (Read 1801 times)

maybe because he really wants freedom that's why satoshi keeps him anonymous, apart from security he might not want to be exposed to what he created.
and that's perfectly natural because people need freedom and keep their privacy and security as you say.
On the other hand, when many people claim satoshi today with a number of facts, it certainly makes us think why not from the beginning and why only now. Of course many people don't believe in that even though they stubbornly claim they are satoshi

Many people try to claim they are real Satoshi Nakamoto by giving many proof but I think they try how to make public look at him, not real Satoshi Nakamoto want to proof his identity because he has many bitcoin assets in his wallet and try how to be careful. Exactly when any body know about him he not safety again because many people try to get access his wallet and many criminal cases happening when public know his identity. Not only for assets safety but also Satoshi Nakamoto try to hidden his identity because he want live without any entertainment publish about him.

although stupid but it will greatly affect their popularity even though the reputation and popularity is bad in some circles.
on the other hand there may be some advantages because they think they are satoshi although I don't really care about that because indeed they are free to make whatever they want including claiming they are satoshi and I am also free to do what I want including not trusting people -people who claim to be satoshi

The thing is, if bitcoin isn't decentralized then I think there's no advantage at all trusting and investing on it, also there would no successful crypto up until now because the bitcoin itself was the foundation and start of crypto evolution we're now experiencing.
Yes you're right @Lanatsa, the whole community/industry will know if the original Satoshi Nakamoto will start moving again and won't be swayed for some random fake wanna be.

I'm just a bit curious tho, what would they gain for claiming that they're the real SN? If it's not fame and popularity, then what?

Ummm... no. One can claim whatever he wants, but without the private keys of those addresses no claimant can spend those coins, no matter what. Not on current bitcoin.
On the other hand, even without claiming anything, whoever has those keys can spend the money.

It isn't about attention but about how much they can take if ever , there are Million of BTC in Satoshi Nakamoto account so if ever who got this amount will surely become an instant Billionaire so that is why there are so many stupid people still trying to claim that name.

and also they will become an instant celebrity because in the past the claimant like Craig Wright becomes an instant crypto community celebrity .

Actually, the goal of those who recognize themselves as Satoshi Nakamoto is only to seek popularity. They are just wasting time. I think those who recognize themselves as Satoshi Nakomoto are very stupid people.

With this alone then you could really say that it isn't decentralized after all and that would surely crash out Bitcoins value in the first place.There are lots of people who had been proclaiming

that theyre Satoshi but no one had able to prove it out and they do know on how popular Satoshi is speaking off Bitcoins creator then they are just simply using that for their own intent.

Thing here is that the entire community does know on whats real and whats fake and Satoshi wont really easily be coming out for that reason.

Yea bitcoin is super valuable because it's property and can be devaluated regardless of it's actual value to avoid paying income taxees. Also bitcoin in a sense doubles money because when one buys bitcoins their money goes into a bank which then spends the money and the bitcoins can be spent as well. No one really is claiming themselves except Craig Wright who is doing it due to reason mentioned above. It's strange he's trying to prove he's Satoshi and not spending the coins, when he's got the keys. No one's stopping him. He's an honorable man, not what a fraud is.

What we should be talking about is that if some one is claiming to be Satoshi the person is suppose to come front and say Bitcoin is created by him and looking at the surface of it Bitcoin is not for fraud is created to support fiat currency and for easy service and save of currency, because is decentralized currency that you will handle with you own security properties

If the owner of Bitcoin can stop its value, then it wouldn't be decentralized anymore. This would make Bitcoin no different than the banking system of today. Only true decentralization will allow Bitcoin to live for generations with or without its creator. There are so many people claiming to be Satoshi only because they want fame and fortune. The real creator is either dead or simply hiding in the shadows in order to avoid being caught by the authorities.

I'd say it's best to never know who Satoshi is or who he/she really was, since it would do more harm than good to Bitcoin. The community is what keeps a blockchain network strong, not a single person. Eventually, the mainstream media will become tired in their search of Satoshi, as they focus on other important things. As long as Bitcoin fulfills its purpose, nothing else matters. Just my thoughts

Ok the real Satoshi Nakamoto is a man named Lukasz Morysewicz. Myself. I was who gave Craig the idea to manufacture email proof from 2007 to 2009 and use it to try and prove he's Satoshi. I created Bitcoin when I was 6 years old, 1999, but was amnesiad. When I came across bitcoin in 2007, I was certain I was it's creator but had no idea how to prove it. I was in contact with Craig and hence came up with why don't you try to do what I'm trying to do. Also in 2007 I was looking for someone to claim to be the creator of the Silk Road since I'd never let the real creator go to jail. I instructed Ross to create the Red Wagon Bookstore to launder money he'd receive but never planned to pay him. Yet in 2011 when I created the email [email protected] and changed it to frosty before giving the account to Ross was to put FBI on his tracks. He'd never do something so stupid. And in 2011 he was willing to do what we had discussed in 2007 without me having paid him. I built bitcoin practically single-handedly from the ground up and Silk Road was not the only thing I was involved in. I'm currently planning on proving this with a lie detector test and taking it to court against Craig. I'm who instructed a Molly in possession of my keys to give them to Craig and for Craig to move a coin so I'd be aware of where to find my keys strangely because I'd be suffering amnesia again. I'm completely broke with no job but I finally had one of my best ideas yet. For the first time in my life I think I know how to prove I am Satoshi Nakamoto, with a lie detector test. Just need to wait for when I have a few hundred dollars for a lie detector test and take that to court. What I speak is truth.

I am not surprised cause more people are still going to surface as the real Satoshi Nakamoto.  I believe they are as much as gullible to the later consequences they might face if the government eventually tag them as the real man behind the coming fall of individual currency which is going to happen soon with time. Since Nakamoto decided to hide his identity away from the society, then is it now that he's going to unveal it? Some persons can be funny at times.

It's no secret that, anyone who claims to be the anonymous inventor gets lost of attention from the public and such news is what the media wants. In this era of social media and bloggers seeking clicks, reposts and all, anyone could just put out a claim and become famous in no time. Its no surprise many have used this name to remain in the spotlight. Even Elon came up with his own time of claim sometime ago, not to be the anonymous inventor but to have guessed who it was. Apparently, he guessed wrong because, we are all Satoshi Nakamoto though, he @Elon archived his aim of being in the spotlight as he so wants to be.

You've said it yourself. All of them are fraud. The REAL satoshi is either dead or simply hidden in order to protect Bitcoin's image as much as possible. Craig is only a fraudster as he's been unable to prove the ownership of Satoshi's original Bitcoin addresses. Signing the keys and showing proof to the public will be the best thing to do in order to bring confidence from the crypto community. It really doesn't matter who Satoshi is, since the community is the one who made Bitcoin a success after all these years. Ever since Satoshi left in 2011, Bitcoin's been growing non-stop. What makes you think the unveiling of Satoshi be any different?

I think if the REAL satoshi is discovered, then that would mean the end of Bitcoin. Governments will be on his/her tail in order to put him/her in jail or faces fines. After all, he created something that goes against Fiat. You'd think Satoshi will be stupid enough to reveal his/her identity when his/her freedom (and probably life) is at stake? It's better to never know who Satoshi is or really was, since Bitcoin is all about decentralization. As long as it fulfills its promise of bringing "banking to the unbanked", nothing else matters. Just my thoughts

I think bitcoin has been around for a very long time but the creator has never appeared in public. I think people who claim to be Satoshi are liars, it is very unlikely that he will appear in public seeing that he has been mysterious for so long it is impossible to suddenly appear, it would be interesting if he remained mysterious.

I don't think any of these people have ever given any definitive proof that they are, indeed, Satoshi Nakamoto. Sometimes I wonder if the real Satoshi steps up we'd even believe it.

Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto won't appear in public Satoshi Nakamoto doesn't want his popularity to remain a mystery forever. So if now many people appear who claim to be satoshi, then that person is a liar, they seek popularity with the name satoshi.

Nothing new because most of them would like to get the credit and some just making a troll on it well nothing wrongs with it unless there's a real authenticity that might shoes up he/she is the real satoshi Nakamoto. By that it will become a huge responsibility will burden and questions. I guess if the bitcoin existence will continue still the same question on it who is the creator and why he/she doesn't show up.

I agree with you, Many who claimed to be Satoshi and gone, Satoshi left bitcoin in 2010 close range of November and since them no body has seen the post of Satoshi Nakamoto in the forum but people claim to be Satoshi without a qualified prove that they are Satoshi nakamoto, but it is Surprise for people claim to bear another person name who is not their relates, i know that theymos know Satoshi method of writing and both of them have meet once, so he knows that people claiming to be Satoshi are fake