Pages:
Author

Topic: Permanent Loss of Bitcoins Over Time - page 2. (Read 6780 times)

hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 532
Former curator of The Bitcoin Museum
November 17, 2012, 01:45:18 AM
#11
What the bitcoin program needs is a wallet backup to email ability.
member
Activity: 73
Merit: 10
November 17, 2012, 12:55:21 AM
#10
As the number of "lost coins" goes up, the chances of people opening a new address and finding a pleasant suprise within also goes up.
Not on any meaningful time scale.

Not just meaningful... on any time scale... heat death of the universe would probably kick in before you'd just randomly find a collision. 
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1013
November 16, 2012, 11:55:06 AM
#9
As the number of "lost coins" goes up, the chances of people opening a new address and finding a pleasant suprise within also goes up.
Not on any meaningful time scale.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
November 16, 2012, 10:35:37 AM
#8
Over time bitcoins will be lost, and by lost I mean forever.  Inevitably wallets will be corrupted or deleted and can't be recovered.  Inevitably someone with bitcoins will die and their heirs will not know how to recover them, if they know of the coins at all.  In theory this loss could add up significantly over a long period of time.  With the total number of bitcoins capped what are the implications?

Forever is a very long time. As the number of "lost coins" goes up, the chances of people opening a new address and finding a pleasant suprise within also goes up.

As the number of bitcoins drops, the value of each bitcoin goes up, so people hold less and less bitcoins in a single place, and so each time bitcoins are lost the number of bitcoins goes down. In addition, as the value of bitcoins goes up, and as knowledge and protocols increase, people will lose less and less of their bitcoins (They are more careful with what they have, since it is worth more, and better layers of protection are invented and used to prevent total loss of bitcoins.) Based on unscientific polls of users of this forum, most bitcoiners are in the 20-35 year old range, these young people do not think about death and wills and providing a means for people to access their bitcoins if they die. However, as the bitcoiner population ages, they will (on average) think more about these things and many will put into place some mechanism for the coins to be passed to their survivors.

Just consider the math behind what you are suggesting. Let's say we have 100 units of currency, and we loose 1% of the outstanding amount every year. After 100 years we will still have 36.6 units of currency. So all the prices will only be about 1/3 as high, and we have had 100 years to be accustumed to the change in price.
member
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
November 16, 2012, 09:46:46 AM
#7
At some point in the future if the value of the smallest divisible unit gets too large the users might agree to a protocol change which adds extra decimal places.
OK I see what you're thinking.  And the natural forces of the economy would adjust accordingly such that BTC .1 then takes on the same "value" as BTC 1 today.  I know I'm dramatically oversimplifying things, but I think I see your point. Or am I looking at this too much like a currency devaluation?
You got it right, it's simply result of law of supply and demand. It is really that simple.
member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
November 16, 2012, 09:03:42 AM
#6
At some point in the future if the value of the smallest divisible unit gets too large the users might agree to a protocol change which adds extra decimal places.
OK I see what you're thinking.  And the natural forces of the economy would adjust accordingly such that BTC .1 then takes on the same "value" as BTC 1 today.  I know I'm dramatically oversimplifying things, but I think I see your point. Or am I looking at this too much like a currency devaluation?
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
November 16, 2012, 06:18:25 AM
#5
Over time bitcoins will be lost, and by lost I mean forever.  Inevitably wallets will be corrupted or deleted and can't be recovered.  Inevitably someone with bitcoins will die and their heirs will not know how to recover them, if they know of the coins at all.  In theory this loss could add up significantly over a long period of time.  With the total number of bitcoins capped what are the implications?

I think the chance of every single satoshi being lost within the next 100 million years would be 1 in 1 trillion. As technology improves, we will eventually have no data loss at all.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
November 16, 2012, 06:14:50 AM
#4
Over time bitcoins will be lost, and by lost I mean forever.  Inevitably wallets will be corrupted or deleted and can't be recovered.  Inevitably someone with bitcoins will die and their heirs will not know how to recover them, if they know of the coins at all.  In theory this loss could add up significantly over a long period of time.  With the total number of bitcoins capped what are the implications?

I think the chance of every single satoshi being lost within the next 100 million years would be 1 in 1 trillion. As technology improves, we will eventually have no data loss at all.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
November 16, 2012, 02:37:33 AM
#3
Then the dude who secretly saved 1000 bitcoins will be the richest person on earth
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1013
November 15, 2012, 10:06:31 PM
#2
With the total number of bitcoins capped what are the implications?
At some point in the future if the value of the smallest divisible unit gets too large the users might agree to a protocol change which adds extra decimal places.
member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
November 15, 2012, 10:03:43 PM
#1
Over time bitcoins will be lost, and by lost I mean forever.  Inevitably wallets will be corrupted or deleted and can't be recovered.  Inevitably someone with bitcoins will die and their heirs will not know how to recover them, if they know of the coins at all.  In theory this loss could add up significantly over a long period of time.  With the total number of bitcoins capped what are the implications?
Pages:
Jump to: