Pages:
Author

Topic: Peter Vessenes (vess) (Read 3405 times)

legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1276
October 25, 2013, 12:46:33 AM
#21
...   Sorry Roger.  Your efforts are appreciated even by dickheads like me who don't share your political views.

yeah im in the same boat. ver really does seem to be a reasonable guy, and sadly at times he is the only guy around to bitch too...

im found of his political views btw.

Of course.  Most people here are.  I'm an exception.  I call attention to this regularly in part so that casual visitors don't come to the conclusion that the Bitcoin ecosystem is a mono-culture of Libertarianism.  Such a characterization makes Bitcoin easier to attack unfairly.

legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1276
October 25, 2013, 12:06:32 AM
#20

It certainly seems like a viable hypothesis to me that Peter Vessenes is first and foremost a grifter who targets dim witted and wealthy early adopters like Karpeles, Ver, etc for victimization.  I mean if you look at the fallout of such things as the Bitcoinica adventure and the Coinlabs/Mt. Gox deal, a lot of money seems to have gone missing.  If this is indeed the case it will be interesting to see if the Winkle dudes avoid taking a hit.


Yeah what a mess. Ver keeps getting caught up in shit like this but i honestly think he is trying to do the best for btc.

Vess i had thought was a scammer from the start.

Ya, now I feel bad about being so mean to Ver.  He really has done a lot for the ecosystem, he is one of the more capable spokesmen, and I cannot really remember anything he's done which is dishonest or negative (except for getting ripped off repeatedly which looks bad.)   Sorry Roger.  Your efforts are appreciated even by dickheads like me who don't share your political views.

legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1276
October 24, 2013, 03:50:07 PM
#19

It certainly seems like a viable hypothesis to me that Peter Vessenes is first and foremost a grifter who targets dim witted and wealthy early adopters like Karpeles, Ver, etc for victimization.  I mean if you look at the fallout of such things as the Bitcoinica adventure and the Coinlabs/Mt. Gox deal, a lot of money seems to have gone missing.  If this is indeed the case it will be interesting to see if the Winkle dudes avoid taking a hit.

legendary
Activity: 1437
Merit: 1002
https://bitmynt.no
September 16, 2013, 01:28:47 PM
#18
This is a legal matter and we are not on the inside.  I have talked with and met Peter in-person a number of times and I have enjoyed his company and he comes across as a smart and competent business man and entrepreneur.  I don't believe this accusation has legs. 
Strange.  People who ate pizza with Pirateat40 said the same thing about him.  Couldn't be a scam.  He was a honest person all the way through.  Some people didn't concede until months after he disappeared.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1026
Mining since 2010 & Hosting since 2012
September 15, 2013, 11:57:34 AM
#17
This is a legal matter and we are not on the inside.  I have talked with and met Peter in-person a number of times and I have enjoyed his company and he comes across as a smart and competent business man and entrepreneur.  I don't believe this accusation has legs. 
legendary
Activity: 1437
Merit: 1002
https://bitmynt.no
September 14, 2013, 06:28:35 PM
#16
Surely, that $5M figure isn't what I think it is and now in the hands of...

http://thegenesisblock.com/warrant-for-mt-gox-wells-fargo-accounts-shows-additional-2-1m-seized/
No, that's a different story.  Read both.
legendary
Activity: 1437
Merit: 1002
https://bitmynt.no
September 14, 2013, 06:27:02 PM
#15
Have a look at this, especially beginning of page 21, and seventh counterclaim and outwards from the end of page 39.  If this, any of it, bear any resemblance to truth, it makes Peter Vessenes the worst thief and scammer in the history of Bitcoin.  Forget the small fish like pirateat40.  Peter Vessenes is the reason why you don't get your USD withdrawals from MtGox.  He stole your deposits.  $5,315,210.79 worth of deposits.

I can't think of anyone who deserve a scammer tag more than vess.
So after defending Gox against all manner of criticism for MONTHS, you are now implying that they are running a fractional reserve system and have been lying all along... but we should all blame Vessenes, due to some business deal gone wrong, the details of which you aren't even privy to?
Did you even read the counterclaims?

Quote
How old are you exactly?
40.
member
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
September 14, 2013, 11:56:46 AM
#14
This is lame
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
September 14, 2013, 08:15:29 AM
#13
I don't think scammer tags are being handed out anymore since the Trust system was implemented. You guys should leave your + or - ratings/feedback on the users Trust page.
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
September 14, 2013, 07:39:21 AM
#12
Ive never thought very highly of MtGox, but after reading this:
http://thegenesisblock.com/mt-gox-responds-to-coinlab-lawsuit-with-5-5m-in-counterclaims/
I tend to see Peter as far more culpable. 

Then again, I will let the courts sort it out, and whether or not he gets a scammer tag here seems completely immaterial compared to the potential outcomes of these cases.
sr. member
Activity: 469
Merit: 250
English Motherfucker do you speak it ?
September 14, 2013, 06:04:24 AM
#11
I support sturle on this.
I have only heard bad things about Peter Vessnes, so many people are pissed at him.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
September 14, 2013, 03:42:42 AM
#10
Quote
21. One of the major issues, if not the major issue, that MtGox was concerned about was legal compliance on the part of CoinLab to conduct the Bitcoin exchange services in the United States that were being discussed by the parties during the negotiations. Early in ...
I desire to learn more of how ANY "trade secret" can circumnavigate federal laws. Once learnt, I have a slew of ideas I wish to manifest.
This is not page 21.

Page 21, the interesting part:
Quote
Defendants are informed and believe that in March and April, 2013 MtGox customers, at the suggestion of CoinLab, deposited $12,788,701.08 in to one or more CoinLab bank accounts; CoinLab then caused the amount of such funds to be credited to such customers' MtGox accounts but CoinLab did not transfer the actual funds into the MtGox bank account. As a result, such customers' MtGox account reflected a higher amount of currency funds available to such customers than were actually in the MtGox bank account. In April, 2013, and upon the demand of MtGox, CoinLab transferred a portion of those amounts, $ 7,473,490.29, to the MtGox bank account, leaving a balance of approximately $ 5,315,210.79 to be transferred to the MtGox account and which is being wrongfully held by CoinLab.

Surely, that $5M figure isn't what I think it is and now in the hands of...

http://thegenesisblock.com/warrant-for-mt-gox-wells-fargo-accounts-shows-additional-2-1m-seized/
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
September 14, 2013, 01:18:18 AM
#9
Have a look at this, especially beginning of page 21, and seventh counterclaim and outwards from the end of page 39.  If this, any of it, bear any resemblance to truth, it makes Peter Vessenes the worst thief and scammer in the history of Bitcoin.  Forget the small fish like pirateat40.  Peter Vessenes is the reason why you don't get your USD withdrawals from MtGox.  He stole your deposits.  $5,315,210.79 worth of deposits.

I can't think of anyone who deserve a scammer tag more than vess.

So after defending Gox against all manner of criticism for MONTHS, you are now implying that they are running a fractional reserve system and have been lying all along... but we should all blame Vessenes, due to some business deal gone wrong, the details of which you aren't even privy to?

How old are you exactly?
sr. member
Activity: 321
Merit: 250
September 13, 2013, 01:30:58 AM
#8
reserved for popcorn and lulz.   p2p ftw.
legendary
Activity: 1437
Merit: 1002
https://bitmynt.no
September 13, 2013, 01:01:33 AM
#7
Quote
21. One of the major issues, if not the major issue, that MtGox was concerned about was legal compliance on the part of CoinLab to conduct the Bitcoin exchange services in the United States that were being discussed by the parties during the negotiations. Early in ...
I desire to learn more of how ANY "trade secret" can circumnavigate federal laws. Once learnt, I have a slew of ideas I wish to manifest.
This is not page 21.

Page 21, the interesting part:
Quote
Defendants are informed and believe that in March and April, 2013 MtGox customers, at the suggestion of CoinLab, deposited $12,788,701.08 in to one or more CoinLab bank accounts; CoinLab then caused the amount of such funds to be credited to such customers' MtGox accounts but CoinLab did not transfer the actual funds into the MtGox bank account. As a result, such customers' MtGox account reflected a higher amount of currency funds available to such customers than were actually in the MtGox bank account. In April, 2013, and upon the demand of MtGox, CoinLab transferred a portion of those amounts, $ 7,473,490.29, to the MtGox bank account, leaving a balance of approximately $ 5,315,210.79 to be transferred to the MtGox account and which is being wrongfully held by CoinLab.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
September 12, 2013, 08:55:10 PM
#6
Quote
21. One of the major issues, if not the major issue, that MtGox was concerned about was legal compliance on the part of CoinLab to conduct the Bitcoin exchange services in the United States that were being discussed by the parties during the negotiations. Early in the negotiations, that is, in approximately May and June 2012 discussions took place among CoinLab and MtGox representatives, including meetings in Japan and over “Skype” video conferencing.

In one or more of those early discussions Vessenes made statements to the effect that CoinLab was compliant with all laws and regulations relevant to conducting the Bitcoin exchange business that was the subject of the parties’ negotiations; and, that CoinLab was registered as a “prepaid access” provider and such was sufficient.

Vessenes refused to disclose or why this was the case even though requested by MtGox, claiming it to be a “trade secret”; and, that if it were disclosed MtGox would have no need for CoinLab. Based on such assurances, MtGox continued negotiations with CoinLab and ultimately entered into the Agreement.

I desire to learn more of how ANY "trade secret" can circumnavigate federal laws. Once learnt, I have a slew of ideas I wish to manifest.
legendary
Activity: 1437
Merit: 1002
https://bitmynt.no
September 12, 2013, 08:00:55 PM
#5
Have a look at this, especially beginning of page 21, and seventh counterclaim and outwards from the end of page 39.  If this, any of it, bear any resemblance to truth, it makes Peter Vessenes the worst thief and scammer in the history of Bitcoin.  Forget the small fish like pirateat40.  Peter Vessenes is the reason why you don't get your USD withdrawals from MtGox.  He stole your deposits.  $5,315,210.79 worth of deposits.

I can't think of anyone who deserve a scammer tag more than vess.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1009
Ad maiora!
May 04, 2013, 06:33:02 AM
#4
I really never gave peter vessenes much thought until recently. With the amount of hate and anger he gets on this board, it makes me think the guys gotta be doing something right!

no wonder satoshi went underground.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 522
May 03, 2013, 07:54:24 PM
#3
I would like to nominate Peter Vessenes (vess on the forum) for a scammer tag.  The heavy selling in the days before the lawsuit was files was supicious.  Then the filing just in time for The Golden Week in Japan when all banks there are closed.  Coincidence?  No way.  And trying to heist 75 million USD from the largest and most important bitcoin exchange?  Deserves a scammer tag if you ask me.  No.  Give him three scammer tags.

Are you a shill? (Aren't you the guy explaining how the MtGox lag is "normal"?)
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
May 03, 2013, 07:13:51 PM
#2
Lulz.
Pages:
Jump to: