Topic: Petition for TheButterZone (Read 926 times)

@Ggddtt
Kindly read this post
and the following posts of that thread.
And no, I don't "find ridiculous" or funny anything here on the subject, least of all your nasty post, "parody" or not.

Glad you find that ridiculous warnings that TheButterZone has started offensive.  My parody probably went too far, but these terms are absurd.

I can't wait to see the hypocrisy that follows in his same auction thread seeing how Quickseller offered to use escrow and I got tagged for it.

After reading the first part of your statement, I would say, you earned to be red tagged, only the reasoning was wrong. (If I could, I would ban you from the forum.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You hit the point. The weight of DT-trust and using to personal drive. Fortunately TBZ is removed from DT and most (or all now?) DT-members are aware of the task-position of their heavyweight trusts and do great work for the forum with their feedbacks.

Note:  If TheButterZone reads this post, he implicitly agrees that he is a dick sucking loser who lives in his mom's basement.  If TheButterZone replies to this post, he implicitly agrees that he be banned from bitcointalk and I shall receive ownership of his account of which I will put a gun in my mouth five minutes after because having to live life as TheButterZone, even if just pretend, is not worth living.

"If "I" ever accept or offer escrow services, assume my account is compromised." - TheButterZone

Are you saying that you're more trustworthy than anyone on this board and that people shouldn't feel safe using escrows as outlined in the bitcointalk rules?

TBZ, the only thing that puts you down is that you don't realized the weight of being a DT member and the feedbacks you gave. The weight between the green, red and neutral feedback.

Learn it. This what brought you of being removed from DT because you can't even distinguish this yourself. You don't even realized the gravity of the stunt your pulling out.

In the end, you mostly intend on using the Trust system to your personal drive without truly serving its purpose. Also, don't be so overly dramatic and don't give in to hysteria (either you're aware of it or not).

You're such an exaggerated character TBZ.

Ooh, another (along with tarmi & EcuaMobi) attempt to conflate a term not violated with the actual term violated, for which you were fair-warned & rated accordingly:



As it seems the anti-terms lynch mob's abject bullshit will never end...
[/list]

I just came back here on BTT after almost 2 months now and came to this topic.

---

Funny.

---

And I came across this thread. I don't mind TBZ to be putting up neutral trust to those who violated his auction terms but (as what mentioned in that thread) it came across me that it is too personal.

I've also read the neutral feedback he gave to EcuaMobi and he is a bit delusional in assuming that those who broke his auction terms are scammers who are pretending to be illiterate or whatsoever.

---

As I said in the OP, this auction thread is very confusing (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.27133270). I think the question I asked back there made sense than selling all those XRPs for JUST a dollar. He even realized it that's why he locked down the thread and made another one (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.27177764) with a much higher starting auction price.

---

Overall, I feel glad that someone had stand up and pointed out this trust abuse. He doesn't understand the weight of his feedbacks and can't judge accordingly to be fit in DT. As TBZ said, it is more than liability or neutrality than an asset to him.

It is time to give it to someone who can understand very well that being a DT means not being an asset to you only but rather as an asset to the forum and the community. DT is not for your personal drive but for the common good. In TBZ's case, it is more like most part of it is personal than for the common good of the forum and the community.

No, unless I'm a sleepless- monster cat. The stats page would easily show this, but it is disabled.

I know, right? All this fucking spam and these scammers running around untamed. Perhaps some people should do something about it.

aka aTriz aka hilariousandco aka theymos aka satoshi

---

Has there ever been any actual evidence linking these users together or are they always just empty words?

Haha this is good. How thicc in the skull can you be?

The first way to tell that The Pharmacist is not an alt of Lauda is through the difference they have on the forum. Lauda is persistently so called childish about being called (and wanting to be called ) Kitty. This is all in good fun though

The Pharmacist does not have a nickname.

Also, one manages campaigns and the other doesn't.

ALSO, The Pharmacist publicly states that he is living in the USA, while Lauda is discrete.

WTF are you talking about?  I don't taste, or even detect, any medicine around here.  I have absolutely nothing invested in anything in this thread and TBZ is free to do as he will.  I stated that I understood his frustration with morons, but that dillpicklechips isn't the typical moron on bitcointalk (like yourself). 

If you've got any valid proof whatsoever that I'm an alt of dillpicklechips or Lauda, go ahead and bring it.  It's Friday night and I need the entertainment.

The corruption in this forum is sad.

Edit: Actually after reading page 2, it is clear Lauda(aka The Pharmacist aka dillpicklechips) is getting a taste of their own medicine. How's it taste?

TBZ, I love you man! That pretty much sums it up.

The term that was violated said you would receive negative trust & specified exactly what to do to have me remove the negative trust, and what not to do. Complaining/asking for consideration (to relieve the grief, pain, or dissatisfaction) is not it.

I've noticed loans being given based on built trust & then defaulted on with impunity. I've noticed campaign managers building trust only to be accused of scamming campaign participants. I've noticed "self-escrowing" & escrows not keeping up/being able to keep up with their deals. I've noticed an escrow telling the victim terms for release, then when met, going back on them & not releasing, leaving it up to the perpetrator to authorize release.

I can't remember ever using a bitcoin escrow (and can't find it in my oldest ratings), not even when I was a noob, and I think I had enough foresight of how escrow could go bad back then, that my opposition to escrow has been consistent. I've missed out on deals recently because people still want me to go through an escrow or send first (if not use a fucking exchange that "loses" deposits, balances, withdrawals) in spite of all my ratings, length of ratings, and all my cryptographic links to those ratings (including enough meatspace info to get me murdered), when they have none or almost none.

Receiving positive trust ratings only seems to be an asset to those who don't/can't keep their word.

I hate debt.
If "I" ever ask for/offer a loan, assume my account is compromised. If "I" ever accept or offer escrow services, assume my account is compromised. If "I" ever recommend or say one positive word about an exchange, assume my account is compromised. If "I" ever get into campaign managing, assume my account is compromised.

I'm back.

Glad that TBZ had noticed this. I'm asking for consideration in this matter. Yes. I do violated the rules and I deeply apologize from the bottom of my heart. I will not state my reason or make any.

I'm not saying to remove the trust you have given to me but rather I'm trying to say it to consider and make it a neutral one.

---

Of course. There is. Haven't you noticed that campaign managers with more trust have more clients than those who don't. Those who are looking for escrow services tends to use those who have green trust. And like you, a trader (goods) tend to be trusted and there are some cases where it saved you hassle to hire an escrow and send your mystery boxes.

I think that's enough to show what asset does this trust system has. If you're thinking of comparing which is more, liability and asset, then that's another thing to talk about.

---

According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, petition means "an earnest request."

Oh, a dakimakura!

Essentially it's a hug pillow usually with a fullsize photo of your "waifu" which in non weeb terms is your favourite female anime character ("your" being whoever is buying the pillow).

Something like https://www.ebay.com/itm/Cute-Anime-Hestia-Danmachi-Dakimakura-Otaku-Hugging-Body-Pillow-Case-Cover-150cm/221765612483?_trkparms=aid%3D777003%26algo%3DDISCL.MBE%26ao%3D2%26asc%3D41375%26meid%3D601997ec3ec64aadb77ac3335d3a008c%26pid%3D100012%26rk%3D6%26rkt%3D12%26mehot%3Dag%26sd%3D361575186317&_trksid=p2047675.c100012.m1985 for example

The trust system is more of a liability or neutrality than an asset to me.

Liabilities:
Takes up too much of my time dealing with complaints about my level, contracts enforcement
Place for people to libel me in retaliation for citing their own words
People "buying ratings" and wanting me to give them a positive rather than a neutral, based on them having no others or what seem to be weighty negatives (and people wanting my positives to be removed based on subsequent allegations)

Neutrality:
Those who act like they want to trade significant amounts P2P/OTC ignore my ratings and/or won't cryptographically verify it's actually me who earned them

Asset:
?

That is not necessary.

philipma1957, I approve of ~TheButterZone being added to your https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust