Pages:
Author

Topic: Petition to unban dank (Read 1806 times)

copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
December 25, 2014, 09:42:08 PM
#25
There are other members who have scammed for much more (TF comes to mind), and are still allowed to post.   Tongue




Dank did not get banned for scamming

He got banned for disrupting threads with utter bullshit after being warned several times.


~BCX~

Whole threads of utter bullshit - in the altcoin or speculation sections, for example - are somehow exempt?

Hmmmkay...


I wouldn't know about that but I have never been banned and have had only one post removed back in 2011.



~BCX~

Not saying for your posts in particular, but some examples - do I need to waste more time?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/moved-becoming-suicidal-870547  (topic was "suicidal", was in speculation, finally got moved to off-topic)
In this case he at least tried to help that poor guy.

And it had to do with Speculation because.....?
Dank didn't create the thread so he can't be blamed for it being filed in the wrong section. Even if dank was somehow at fault for the OP of that thread creating it in the incorrect section I don't think that is something you will get banned for.

I think the thread was in speculation because the OP of the thread was speculating on the price of bitcoin and ended up loosing a lot of money

So my interpretation of Speculation, as it is in the Economics section, leads me to understand it is of a financial market topic, not a personal one:
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/speculation.asp

DEFINITION of 'Speculation'

The act of trading in an asset, or conducting a financial transaction, that has a significant risk of losing most or all of the initial outlay, in expectation of a substantial gain. With speculation, the risk of loss is more than offset by the possibility of a huge gain; otherwise, there would be very little motivation to speculate. While it is often confused with gambling, the key difference is that speculation is generally tantamount to taking a calculated risk and is not dependent on pure chance, whereas gambling depends on totally random outcomes or chance.



But enough of this now, some of us have a life to attend to on this Christmas Holiday!
No, you are correct, the topic was filed in the incorrect section, however this was not dank's fault. He did not create the thread
legendary
Activity: 1267
Merit: 1000
December 25, 2014, 09:35:12 PM
#24
There are other members who have scammed for much more (TF comes to mind), and are still allowed to post.   Tongue




Dank did not get banned for scamming

He got banned for disrupting threads with utter bullshit after being warned several times.


~BCX~

Whole threads of utter bullshit - in the altcoin or speculation sections, for example - are somehow exempt?

Hmmmkay...


I wouldn't know about that but I have never been banned and have had only one post removed back in 2011.



~BCX~

Not saying for your posts in particular, but some examples - do I need to waste more time?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/moved-becoming-suicidal-870547  (topic was "suicidal", was in speculation, finally got moved to off-topic)
In this case he at least tried to help that poor guy.

And it had to do with Speculation because.....?
Dank didn't create the thread so he can't be blamed for it being filed in the wrong section. Even if dank was somehow at fault for the OP of that thread creating it in the incorrect section I don't think that is something you will get banned for.

I think the thread was in speculation because the OP of the thread was speculating on the price of bitcoin and ended up loosing a lot of money

So my interpretation of Speculation, as it is in the Economics section, leads me to understand it is of a financial market topic, not a personal one:
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/speculation.asp

DEFINITION of 'Speculation'

The act of trading in an asset, or conducting a financial transaction, that has a significant risk of losing most or all of the initial outlay, in expectation of a substantial gain. With speculation, the risk of loss is more than offset by the possibility of a huge gain; otherwise, there would be very little motivation to speculate. While it is often confused with gambling, the key difference is that speculation is generally tantamount to taking a calculated risk and is not dependent on pure chance, whereas gambling depends on totally random outcomes or chance.



But enough of this now, some of us have a life to attend to on this Christmas Holiday!
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
December 25, 2014, 09:22:49 PM
#23
There are other members who have scammed for much more (TF comes to mind), and are still allowed to post.   Tongue




Dank did not get banned for scamming

He got banned for disrupting threads with utter bullshit after being warned several times.


~BCX~

Whole threads of utter bullshit - in the altcoin or speculation sections, for example - are somehow exempt?

Hmmmkay...


I wouldn't know about that but I have never been banned and have had only one post removed back in 2011.



~BCX~

Not saying for your posts in particular, but some examples - do I need to waste more time?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/moved-becoming-suicidal-870547  (topic was "suicidal", was in speculation, finally got moved to off-topic)
In this case he at least tried to help that poor guy.

And it had to do with Speculation because.....?
Dank didn't create the thread so he can't be blamed for it being filed in the wrong section. Even if dank was somehow at fault for the OP of that thread creating it in the incorrect section I don't think that is something you will get banned for.

I think the thread was in speculation because the OP of the thread was speculating on the price of bitcoin and ended up loosing a lot of money
legendary
Activity: 1267
Merit: 1000
December 25, 2014, 09:13:31 PM
#22
There are other members who have scammed for much more (TF comes to mind), and are still allowed to post.   Tongue




Dank did not get banned for scamming

He got banned for disrupting threads with utter bullshit after being warned several times.


~BCX~

Whole threads of utter bullshit - in the altcoin or speculation sections, for example - are somehow exempt?

Hmmmkay...


I wouldn't know about that but I have never been banned and have had only one post removed back in 2011.



~BCX~

Not saying for your posts in particular, but some examples - do I need to waste more time?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/moved-becoming-suicidal-870547  (topic was "suicidal", was in speculation, finally got moved to off-topic)
In this case he at least tried to help that poor guy.

And it had to do with Speculation because.....?
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
December 25, 2014, 09:09:25 PM
#21
There are other members who have scammed for much more (TF comes to mind), and are still allowed to post.   Tongue




Dank did not get banned for scamming

He got banned for disrupting threads with utter bullshit after being warned several times.


~BCX~

Whole threads of utter bullshit - in the altcoin or speculation sections, for example - are somehow exempt?

Hmmmkay...


I wouldn't know about that but I have never been banned and have had only one post removed back in 2011.



~BCX~

Not saying for your posts in particular, but some examples - do I need to waste more time?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/moved-becoming-suicidal-870547  (topic was "suicidal", was in speculation, finally got moved to off-topic)
In this case he at least tried to help that poor guy.
legendary
Activity: 1267
Merit: 1000
December 25, 2014, 09:05:30 PM
#20
There are other members who have scammed for much more (TF comes to mind), and are still allowed to post.   Tongue




Dank did not get banned for scamming

He got banned for disrupting threads with utter bullshit after being warned several times.


~BCX~

Whole threads of utter bullshit - in the altcoin or speculation sections, for example - are somehow exempt?

Hmmmkay...


I wouldn't know about that but I have never been banned and have had only one post removed back in 2011.



~BCX~

Not saying for your posts in particular, but some examples - do I need to waste more time?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/moved-becoming-suicidal-870547  (topic was "suicidal", was in speculation, finally got moved to off-topic)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/is-this-the-end-of-me-897772 (topic "is this the end of me?")

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-shitcoin-887137
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-in-freefall-too-bad-for-those-people-who-bought-over-100-hahaha-897326  (and another other threads/posts by fallling, fewcoins, NotLambChop and others)
legendary
Activity: 4536
Merit: 3188
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
December 25, 2014, 03:08:49 AM
#19
Whole threads of utter bullshit - in the altcoin or speculation sections, for example - are somehow exempt?

Hmmmkay...
Utter bullshit is allowed if it's on topic. I think that's the reason dank wasn't banned sooner - he used to keep all his bullshit posts to his own bullshit threads.
legendary
Activity: 1267
Merit: 1000
December 25, 2014, 02:06:52 AM
#18
There are other members who have scammed for much more (TF comes to mind), and are still allowed to post.   Tongue




Dank did not get banned for scamming

He got banned for disrupting threads with utter bullshit after being warned several times.


~BCX~

Whole threads of utter bullshit - in the altcoin or speculation sections, for example - are somehow exempt?

Hmmmkay...
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
December 24, 2014, 01:41:22 AM
#17
Has Dank ever posted anything of substance?
No. He's consumed plenty of substances though. Cheesy

Never mind. At least he has his Shroomery forum account to fall back on. Oh wait...
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004
December 24, 2014, 01:15:45 AM
#16
Has Dank ever posted anything of substance?
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
December 23, 2014, 05:22:28 PM
#15
There are other members who have scammed for much more (TF comes to mind), and are still allowed to post.   Tongue



TF also donated 50btc to the forum.  But I'm still sure he would get banned (after a couple warnings) were he to keep posting the nonsense dank did.
legendary
Activity: 1267
Merit: 1000
December 23, 2014, 05:20:06 PM
#14
There are other members who have scammed for much more (TF comes to mind), and are still allowed to post.   Tongue

full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
December 22, 2014, 04:24:25 AM
#13
dank should be allowed to post here. he didnt do anything wrong and doesnt afraid of anything.
Apart from his fear of reality.

Again, watch what people do, not what they say.

Thats a real phobia? fear of reality.

Interesting saying by the way.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
December 22, 2014, 04:10:43 AM
#12
dank should be allowed to post here. he didnt do anything wrong and doesnt afraid of anything.
Apart from his fear of reality.

Again, watch what people do, not what they say.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
December 22, 2014, 03:33:50 AM
#11
Burden of proof fails us both so why don't we look at this thread for it's actual substance.
Because there is no substance. It's just Dank whining he's been banned.

there is a substance alright....
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
December 22, 2014, 03:33:08 AM
#10
dank should be allowed to post here. he didnt do anything wrong and doesnt afraid of anything.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
December 22, 2014, 03:26:56 AM
#9
I believe you, buffer, are sitting in the same computer lab as the user vod.
I would have nothing to gain from that.

Burden of proof fails us both so why don't we look at this thread for it's actual substance.
Because there is no substance. It's just Dank whining he's been banned.

Dank was wrongly banned.  His voice censored.  No explanation as to why, just permanently banned and no questions asked.
It was explained.

Does the amount of authoritarian actions here not alarm anybody?
No. This is a private forum. Those in charge are free to choose who is allowed in or not. Anyway he was given multiple chances to change his ways. He didn't.

How convenient it was that dank happened to speak against bitcoin
Are your trolling? Dank spent 99% of his energy trying to scheme bitcoin out of peoples pockets into his. He is defiantly NOT anti-bitcoin or anti-money.

Watch what people do, not what they say.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
December 21, 2014, 08:33:16 PM
#8
While I do agree with vod's posts in the lending section (calling out scammers) I do think he does play a role in the derailing of threads that dank posts in by brining up the fact that he has not repaid squall his 52 BTC; when he brings this up dank replies and the thread is derailed from there. The threads that I have seen have not gotten derailed from dank's first post alone.

I would dispute the fact that dank scammed for over $10,000.00. I forget the exact amount, but the value of the bitcoin he borrowed at the time he borrowed it was only a few hundred dollars. I have said this before and will say it again that I will agree to pay dank's debt if squall can make a reasonable settlement offer based on the fiat value of the bitcoin loaned as of when it was loaned, if it means that dank stops getting harassed by Vod (and others) about his debt.

While I do not post in the same sections that dank tends to post in, I would support an unbanning of dank, especially if he would agree to not reply to posts addressed to him that are not about the OP of a thread.
full member
Activity: 131
Merit: 100
December 21, 2014, 08:13:39 PM
#7
I believe you, buffer, are sitting in the same computer lab as the user vod.  Burden of proof fails us both so why don't we look at this thread for it's actual substance.

Dank was wrongly banned.  His voice censored.  No explanation as to why, just permanently banned and no questions asked.  Does the amount of authoritarian actions here not alarm anybody?

How convenient it was that dank happened to speak against bitcoin and all monetary systems in a philosophical/moral standpoint and he was permanently banned, no explanation needed.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
December 21, 2014, 02:16:37 PM
#6
I believe Hoffmen is dank. I called him out on this way back in this thread about a year ago:
@hoffman - Is that you Dank logged in under a different account?
Pages:
Jump to: