Pages:
Author

Topic: Phi2 miner for AMD - page 4. (Read 4847 times)

full member
Activity: 364
Merit: 106
ONe Social Network.
July 09, 2018, 10:48:08 AM
#10
Bumping and hoping for any news, any real input appreciated. Thx all.

nothing new to report, lux devs have been busy to get the chain back on track...
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
July 08, 2018, 06:07:40 PM
#9
Bumping and hoping for any news, any real input appreciated. Thx all.
hero member
Activity: 636
Merit: 516
July 02, 2018, 10:23:36 PM
#8
it's more than simply an algorithm change, the blockheader has also jumped from 80 bytes to 144 with the addition of two fields.. thats a big cubehash512
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
July 02, 2018, 09:15:39 PM
#7
The other half of this--Phi2 isn't Phi1612. If someone gets one working, tunes, analyzes, and has the data to say "ain't gonna happen"...that's different, that's acceptable. At that point there's no choice but to move on.
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
July 02, 2018, 09:04:30 PM
#6
phi algo is so tight on nvidias, there is no needs to do an phi amd miner. Like neo miner. It exist, but not many people use this

So far all I have to go on is whattomine estimates. Does two rigs of 1070s produce more than same number of 580s? According to 1612 #s yes, comes out to about 165 vs 200.

So if you're in it for efficiency then sure, AMD not a viable option. But realize some are playing the gamble in hopes it increases in the future. If someone can still cover costs, even make a miniscule profit, but achieve the goal of banking some coin cheaper than buying...then it's worth it to them based on their strategy. Looking at the future potential of what is mined, not the current going rate.

That said--i can't buy the "there's no need" line. There's hash to give and Dev fee to be had if someone produces something, that's the bottom line.
full member
Activity: 213
Merit: 101
July 01, 2018, 01:19:15 PM
#5
phi algo is so tight on nvidias, there is no needs to do an phi amd miner. Like neo miner. It exist, but not many people use this
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 19
July 01, 2018, 09:33:58 AM
#4
sorry, wrong discussion
jr. member
Activity: 157
Merit: 6
July 01, 2018, 12:19:11 AM
#3
I think you should ask the AMD Lyra2z miner  tdxminer  devs, because lyra2 2nd kernel takes 75%+ GPU time on PHI2 algo so again it should be faster on AMD vs Nvidia.
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
June 30, 2018, 08:37:58 PM
#2
Also...this is mainly regarding  https://luxcore.io

Any input appreciated!
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
June 30, 2018, 10:51:19 AM
#1
Anyone working on, or have plans to work on, a Phi2 miner for AMD gpus? There is a version of ccminer and cryptodredge for NVidia and there are supposedly attempts to get SGMiner working but no timeline. Anyone else aware of anything in the works?

Pages:
Jump to: