Topic: PIVx = the next DASH. - where did my last post go? - page 2. (Read 2210 times)

But this coin to me gives even more incentive to hodl so could produce even more wild pumps if making money on swings is your thing and let's cut through the bullshit of people saying I don't like making profit I just love the idea of crypto and want to remain poor.

Along with that it actually has a fair start and no slashing of the minting.

To me this coin looks like a certain big player here. It has not even hit pump central yet. Let's await the polo listing.

If you look at my post history I have been saying everyone should get a little of this and bay just because they seem to offer a lot for the MC. I also said bbr had a good change a 5k sats.

Everyone must do their own reseach and comparisons but pivX stillCOULD have a long way to go before the train stops.

Why would you not liquidate a dash masternode and hold a HUGE % in a better clone with not bad start holding it back.

What makes you think that you wont see a good community build up around a coin that is fairer to the community?

Of course there can be many bumps in a road you do not see. So nothing is for certain. I never put in more than I can afford to lose in any coin hence why there are those probably making far greater returns on these rises than my small returns. That's cool by me I just like a little profits at least after spending a long time reading and comparing.

Crypto is kind of like gambling where you can get the edge if you put in enough work researching over those that do not. Of course you have the chance of getting bent over at multiple stages beyond your control or research. Overall though it is quite fun supporting some of these projects whilst together we are funding the development of something hopefully better than anything we've known in the past.

I posted a response to a newbie-created thread asking about OWL and BOScoin.

Thread completely vanished and my response doesn't appear in my post history.

(But that's probably normal for bitcointalk)

Cheers

Graham

Edit. I thought to check my drafts:


As written, the BOScoin white paper is nonsensical conjecture. The authors are hallucinating a requirement for a procedural extension to a declarative representation.

Wrt OWL and ontologies - fwiw, the blockchain is a directed acyclic graph (DAG) and in consequence, it maps straight into an RDF model. Unlike BOScoin, I can offer a proof-of-concept, see the DOACC ontology, developed from Melvin Carvalho's initial CCY ontology:

DOACC docs: https://doacc.github.io/

DOACC repos: https://github.com/DOACC

DOACC ontology https://github.com/DOACC/doacc/blob/master/doacc.owl

DOACC population: https://github.com/DOACC/individuals

If you're interested in exploring OWL and the subset DLs and you're not already aware of Stanford's FOSS ontology authoring app, Protege, then obtaining a copy and working through the basic ?how to create an ontology? tutorials will give you a +5 spell of immunity from BOScoin-style bloviation.

Cheers

Graham